Moderator: Community Team
Funkyterrance wrote:The system is flawed. If someone gives me a vindictive/illogical rating, why should I not have to option to reevaluate my rating of them? C+A needs you to provide a mountain of evidence to fight someone who does this sort of thing so there is no real way to deal with this issue with the current system. The first person to rate vindictively is rating for revenge so why can't the receiver do the same??? What you are suggesting is fair only benefits the person who FIRST decides to be vindictive. How is this a good system?
Besides, if everyone knew there would be repercussions for rating vindictively they would maybe think twice before doing so and there would be no need for anyone to change their rating in the first place.
Instructions Page, Ratings wrote:Once the game is archived the rating cannot be changed unless you play the member again, at which point you may revise your rating to reflect any changes in opinion.
Funkyterrance wrote:Yea Andy, I realize that. The guy two posts before suggested that but the problem is you are just setting yourself up to be vindictively rated again. No matter how many times you play that person he/she will have damaged your reputation more than you have theirs, which is not even what I want to accomplish. My intent is to maybe dissuade players from making this sort of vindictive move in the first place and if they do, they should get their just desserts as far as their attitude rating in concerned.
Funkyterrance wrote:The system is flawed. If someone gives me a vindictive/illogical rating, why should I not have to option to reevaluate my rating of them?
Funkyterrance wrote: At least with the new system there would be no victimization, which is why I feel so strongly about this issue.
Funkyterrance wrote:Actually what I am suggesting would technically not even be discipline if it were not abused. If someone rates me vindictively I feel I should be allowed to rate them poorly on attitude, doesn't seem disciplinary to me, just my honest overall rating.
DarthFrog wrote:If someone rates you badly, just write a response.
As for no one caring about the ranking, I doubt that's true. I don't mind the system. It's helped me find some real douchebags on this site that I have foed before ever playing a game with them.
army of nobunaga wrote:I mean, anyone over 2000 games here will tell you the CC rating system is broke, dumb, and the while thing needs to be scraped.
...
Funkyterrance wrote:Ok, maybe I should change the wording. The rating system is inaccurate. From what I am gathering most people are either saying that it doesn't matter or that you can't really trust it. This to me seems like enough evidence to suggest that it needs tweaking in one form or another. Either that or just get rid of it, if it is more or less meaningless.
Return to Archived Suggestions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users