winners and losers *rejected*

by **antjo** on Fri Dec 29, 2006 3:12 am

if you are killed first, your lost have to be bigger then if you last second
lets say
1 place: win points
2place: loose no points
3place: loose half points
4place: loose normal points
5place: loose 1.5 x points
6place: loose 2x points

by **Ronaldinho** on Fri Dec 29, 2006 3:32 am

that is the biggest pile of shit ive ever heard! gfy is that ever happning !

by **AK_iceman** on Fri Dec 29, 2006 3:44 am

It would be an interesting option, and would be good for tourny games also.
Let's see what the others think.

by **wicked** on Fri Dec 29, 2006 3:45 am

I believe it's already been suggested and rejected. But if you're too lazy to look, so am I.

by **reverend_kyle** on Fri Dec 29, 2006 3:57 am

Ronaldinho wrote:that is the biggest pile of shit ive ever heard! gfy is that ever happning !

go f*ck yourself is that ever happening?

what?

by **Ronaldinho** on Fri Dec 29, 2006 4:24 am

lol anger post. Ill rephrase.

f*ck off is that ever going to happen, that is a big pile of wank.

but i was a little hasty, i think it would be only feasable in tournys.

by **Scorba** on Fri Dec 29, 2006 4:24 am

No, no, no. There is no second, third or whatever place. You win or you lose.

by **Ronaldinho** on Fri Dec 29, 2006 4:31 am

Scorba wrote:No, no, no. There is no second, third or whatever place. You win or you lose.

you just happen to win alot :roll:

by **lackattack** on Fri Dec 29, 2006 12:00 pm

There is no honour in finishing second.

People will make deals to let each other win.

Never.

by **MOBAJOBG** on Fri Dec 29, 2006 12:14 pm

As it is, a Private who is the strongest of the three in strength (one a Captain and the other a Sergeant)... the Captain who is on the verge of losing and to ensure minimum points loss went kamikaze to attack the Private so that the Sergeant can get away with an easy win.

by **sully800** on Fri Dec 29, 2006 1:58 pm

This is the same problem I have with terminator games (though that isn't as bad).

In this game you win or lose and shouldn't be rewarded for losing later than everyone else. I've always been glad lack feels the same way!

That would ruin the basic strategy of the game because people would be trying to not lose on that turn instead of actually winning.

Also, it wouldn't work well because sometimes everyone is eliminated on the same turn and whoever was taken out first might have just been luck of the draw, not worse play than anyone else (except the winner)

winners and losers rejected

winners and losers rejected

Who is online