Moderator: Community Team
greenoaks wrote:new players are not being beat up. new players have a ? instead of a rank symbol.
all those who have a rank are fair game. end of story.
how hard is that to understand.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
lynch5762 wrote:greenoaks wrote:new players are not being beat up. new players have a ? instead of a rank symbol.
all those who have a rank are fair game. end of story.
how hard is that to understand.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
apparently this is very hard for you to understand so I will explain...
(1) first, by your statement, you would suggest that anyone who has surpassed the (5) game minimum to get rid of their ? rank is no longer a "new" player and therefore "fair game"..... Well, at last checked, you had 8,551 games completed. This would amount to eight thousand, five hundred, and forty-six (8,546) more games completed by you than the same said person. So I would think that most intelligent people would say that the person with 5 games under his belt is relatively new compared to you. I could be wrong though so maybe I should just beat my head against a wall and figure it out.
(2) secondly, your opinion is not the only one that matters here so I am afraid to tell you that your opinion is NOT the end of the story.
Sorry to bearer of bad news to you.
macbone wrote:Lynch, I'd like to see a potential formula suggested there. I confess to lacking the mathematics know-how to know how that would work.
An average rank of opponents on the scoreboard would be cool, and would be great bragging rights for the strongest players. Right, maprank already includes that, so it shouldn't be too hard to implement.
DoomYoshi wrote:Posting average rank of opponents doesn't make any sense. Anyone who actually cares already knows who the farmers are.
What the people who care want is humiliation of the farmers.
I think the solution is that all farmers (and I mean this in the sense that lynch means it) have to post unflattering pictures of themselves in their undergarments. This will humiliate them, and then the whiners will hopefully stop whining. If points are that important to you: start farming. Why is that a difficult concept?
Alternately, if you wanted to see who among a certain group of players is the best, you could hold a tournament. Or, you could start a usergroup with it's own scoreboard.
Really, there is no problem. You are stuck with a silly idea that points matter because as a human, when you see a number, you want it to rise. Stop being human. It is time to ascend to a better place.
I would like to modify a classic question: "who is worse: the idiot farming or the idiot following them around
complaining?"
DoomYoshi wrote:Posting average rank of opponents doesn't make any sense. Anyone who actually cares already knows who the farmers are.
What the people who care want is humiliation of the farmers.
I think the solution is that all farmers (and I mean this in the sense that lynch means it) have to post unflattering pictures of themselves in their undergarments. This will humiliate them, and then the whiners will hopefully stop whining. If points are that important to you: start farming. Why is that a difficult concept?
Alternately, if you wanted to see who among a certain group of players is the best, you could hold a tournament. Or, you could start a usergroup with it's own scoreboard.
Really, there is no problem. You are stuck with a silly idea that points matter because as a human, when you see a number, you want it to rise. Stop being human. It is time to ascend to a better place.
I would like to modify a classic question: "who is worse: the idiot farming or the idiot following them around complaining?"
padsta wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:Posting average rank of opponents doesn't make any sense. Anyone who actually cares already knows who the farmers are.
What the people who care want is humiliation of the farmers.
I think the solution is that all farmers (and I mean this in the sense that lynch means it) have to post unflattering pictures of themselves in their undergarments. This will humiliate them, and then the whiners will hopefully stop whining. If points are that important to you: start farming. Why is that a difficult concept?
Alternately, if you wanted to see who among a certain group of players is the best, you could hold a tournament. Or, you could start a usergroup with it's own scoreboard.
Really, there is no problem. You are stuck with a silly idea that points matter because as a human, when you see a number, you want it to rise. Stop being human. It is time to ascend to a better place.
I would like to modify a classic question: "who is worse: the idiot farming or the idiot following them around
complaining?"
actually yoshi, posting the average rank played on the scoreboard will go a long way towards humiliating them, and seeing as we cannot actually "post unflattering pictures of themselves in their undergarments" having the average rank played on the scoreboard is practically the same thing.
It is a sort of middle ground, it will allow the point whores to continue their questionable tactics while at the same time anyone who cares will be able to see right away if someone is farming, and they will have a stat on the scoreboard to back it up.
lynch5762 wrote:Seriously???
Give me a break TFO and GO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I think we ALL know what the freaking rules are by now when it comes to farming!!!
Do you really think that that is what this post hoped to achieve???? to interpret the rules????
Please tell me that everyone here is not that fucking stupid!!
I took the time to think of what I thought was a well thought out suggestion to the apparent problem on many forums and this is the response I get????????????????????????
My god..... ban me please.... BAN THE LIVING f*ck OUT OF ME BECAUSE THIS IS JUST FUCKING STUPID!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Return to Archived Suggestions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users