Moderator: Community Team
josko.ri wrote:At IcePack, 14 games is too low tobe statistically significant, plus of these 14 games 8 were played onyourhome map and only 2 on myhome map.
Also Icepack, i am waiting for you and for Don in mega finale of One ManClan to show you whois the boss. Of course, if someone does not eliminate you before you reach me.Not sureif Bariclaw is also participating?
shoop76 wrote:josko.ri wrote:It seems that 10/47 people who voted thinks this is poor sportmanship which is 21%. It is quite a big number of % for something that can be decider in some games. Obviously, 21% of CC users would have never used this unsportmanship behaviour even if they have chance which make them disadvantaged over 79% of CC users who does not see problems in using this kind of strategy.
My team will anyway beat Fyrdraca team in the series of 9 sets so the win that they achieved on this shameful way will anyway be phyrric. Hopefully this shameful way of winning makes Fydraca and his company of friends happy and fullfilled
When they did not use such shameful strategy, in group phase of the championships tournament, my team kicked their asses with 6-0 victory, which shows enough how much are strategic differences between our teams. With such strategic inferiority, it is no wonder that they thought of different ways for achieving their win which are on the borderline of good sportmanship.
Honestly, Josko, I think it would be higher, but I am sure that there all people that voted against you just to be against you. Just for the record, I am one of the 21% who believe it is poor sportsmanship and 1 of the people who do not have anything against you.
josko.ri wrote:My team will anyway beat Fyrdraca team in the series of 9 sets so the win that they achieved on this shameful way will anyway be phyrric. Hopefully this shameful way of winning makes Fydraca and his company of friends happy and fullfilled
When they did not use such shameful strategy, in group phase of the championships tournament, my team kicked their asses with 6-0 victory, which shows enough how much are strategic differences between our teams. With such strategic inferiority, it is no wonder that they thought of different ways for achieving their win which are on the borderline of good sportmanship.
Fyrdraca wrote:josko.ri wrote:My team will anyway beat Fyrdraca team in the series of 9 sets so the win that they achieved on this shameful way will anyway be phyrric. Hopefully this shameful way of winning makes Fydraca and his company of friends happy and fullfilled
When they did not use such shameful strategy, in group phase of the championships tournament, my team kicked their asses with 6-0 victory, which shows enough how much are strategic differences between our teams. With such strategic inferiority, it is no wonder that they thought of different ways for achieving their win which are on the borderline of good sportmanship.
Thankfully itās only a best of 7 sets match so the worst that can happen is we lose the next 30 games instead of 40.
Also, the word is pyrrhic. Also also, Iām not sure how that adjective applies to this situation, as I definitely donāt feel like Iāve lost anything or suffered any lasting damages.
Also also also, you were right the first time, my name is Fyrdraca not Fydraca.
And lastly, why are you signaling me out?!?! I wasnāt even the one who executed the move that you are upset about.
josko.ri wrote:Fyrdraca wrote:josko.ri wrote:My team will anyway beat Fyrdraca team in the series of 9 sets so the win that they achieved on this shameful way will anyway be phyrric. Hopefully this shameful way of winning makes Fydraca and his company of friends happy and fullfilled
When they did not use such shameful strategy, in group phase of the championships tournament, my team kicked their asses with 6-0 victory, which shows enough how much are strategic differences between our teams. With such strategic inferiority, it is no wonder that they thought of different ways for achieving their win which are on the borderline of good sportmanship.
Thankfully itās only a best of 7 sets match so the worst that can happen is we lose the next 30 games instead of 40.
Also, the word is pyrrhic. Also also, Iām not sure how that adjective applies to this situation, as I definitely donāt feel like Iāve lost anything or suffered any lasting damages.
Also also also, you were right the first time, my name is Fyrdraca not Fydraca.
And lastly, why are you signaling me out?!?! I wasnāt even the one who executed the move that you are upset about.
It is pyrrhic because it gave you one undeserved win, but we will overcome you in best-of-7 sets so this win will not help you to beat us in larger scale.
I signal you out because you are first mentioned member in your team, which is usually referred as team leader.
Elaterate wrote:The more he speaks, the more pathetic he looks
Elaterate wrote:21% in votes is "quite high" but winning 46% of games is "hardly beating him"... your logic is spot
josko.ri wrote:It seems that 10/47 people who voted thinks this is poor sportmanship which is 21%. It is quite a big number of % for something that can be decider in some games. Obviously, 21% of CC users would have never used this unsportmanship behaviour even if they have chance which make them disadvantaged over 79% of CC users who does not see problems in using this kind of strategy.
josko.ri wrote:My team will anyway beat Fyrdraca team in the series of 9 sets so the win that they achieved on this shameful way will anyway be phyrric. Hopefully this shameful way of winning makes Fydraca and his company of friends happy and fullfilled
When they did not use such shameful strategy, in group phase of the championships tournament, my team kicked their asses with 6-0 victory, which shows enough how much are strategic differences between our teams. With such strategic inferiority, it is no wonder that they thought of different ways for achieving their win which are on the borderline of good sportmanship.
josko.ri wrote:Elaterate wrote:The more he speaks, the more pathetic he looks
out of so many of your posts in this thread, it is hard to tell which one is more waste.
Your contribution to the thread topic is equal to zero or even negative, your only motivation is to undermine me.
But people are not dumb, everyone can easily recognize your "noble" intentions.
Elaterate wrote:Now you want to act like a child again and bring up stats between the two of us?? LMAO... We haven't played the magical 25 games YOU say is needed for the stats to count and/or matter...
josko.ri wrote:Elaterate wrote:Now you want to act like a child again and bring up stats between the two of us?? LMAO... We haven't played the magical 25 games YOU say is needed for the stats to count and/or matter...
Hey you wannabe statistician, I lead you 14v6 in head-to-head, but you say it is not 25 games?
Fine, I gift you 5 games for free and then our score is 14-11 in my favor which is 25 games.
See, even with my gifting you 5 games for free I still beat you within 25 games, how unskilled player you are
josko.ri wrote:1v1 where luck is main factor.
hopalong wrote:my understanding is that you only brought up your concern to the saucy team about their use of 'the loophole strategy' after all games in the 1st set were decided resulting in your team losing the first set. you didnt mention it when it happened in the particular game, you didnt mention it when the game ended, you didnt mention it when you had some free time ... you only mentioned it after it was clear that you lost the 1st set. given your confidence in winning the overall series, and given your own admission that you have known of this loophole for years, i question your sincerity in launching this poll in the first place.
josko.ri wrote:hopalong wrote:my understanding is that you only brought up your concern to the saucy team about their use of 'the loophole strategy' after all games in the 1st set were decided resulting in your team losing the first set. you didnt mention it when it happened in the particular game, you didnt mention it when the game ended, you didnt mention it when you had some free time ... you only mentioned it after it was clear that you lost the 1st set. given your confidence in winning the overall series, and given your own admission that you have known of this loophole for years, i question your sincerity in launching this poll in the first place.
This is utterly wrong info.
The same day that the loophole happened, BEFORE even Iang7 played his first next turn, I reported this issue to TOs Mad777 and benga with replay request.
They replied to me that no written rule was broken but that it is considered as bad sportmanship. But, since no written rule was broken then they cannot grant me replay.
Then, I wrote to Fyrdraca, JPlo64 and groovysmurf telling them that this was ruled as not against rules but as bad sportmanship and that both me and TOs consider this to be bad sportmanship. I asked them that, in case that they agree it was bad sportmanship, then I suggest replay of the game where both teams will follow good sportmanship manners. groovysmurf replied that they do not consider it bad sportmanship and therefore they reject my offer for replay.
Then, I made this thread, I was curious who is right, me, Mad777 and benga who concluded that this is bad sportmanship, or Fyrdraca, JPlo64 and groovysmurf who concluded that this is not bad sportmanship.
If we will strictly follow decision from TO, then this IS bad sportmanship, as Mad777 explicitly wrote in his pm to me when he ruled out this case.
The case was also brought to attention of king achilles and he concluded that decision from TO should be respected. Therefore, the decision that this IS bad sportmanship should officially be respected, according to king achilles ruling.
josko.ri wrote: given that Cricket is around 100th ranked amongst my the best maps.
Elaterate wrote:
Is it bad sportsmanship to play within the rules set? f*ck NO!
Is it bad sportsmanship to complain about a "loophole" someone used to defeat you, when you in fact have used the same loophole to win a GAME before? f*ck YES!
saxitoxin wrote:deaths among the unvaccinated are higher.
josko.ri wrote:shoop76 wrote:josko.ri wrote:It seems that 10/47 people who voted thinks this is poor sportmanship which is 21%. It is quite a big number of % for something that can be decider in some games. Obviously, 21% of CC users would have never used this unsportmanship behaviour even if they have chance which make them disadvantaged over 79% of CC users who does not see problems in using this kind of strategy.
My team will anyway beat Fyrdraca team in the series of 9 sets so the win that they achieved on this shameful way will anyway be phyrric. Hopefully this shameful way of winning makes Fydraca and his company of friends happy and fullfilled
When they did not use such shameful strategy, in group phase of the championships tournament, my team kicked their asses with 6-0 victory, which shows enough how much are strategic differences between our teams. With such strategic inferiority, it is no wonder that they thought of different ways for achieving their win which are on the borderline of good sportmanship.
Honestly, Josko, I think it would be higher, but I am sure that there all people that voted against you just to be against you. Just for the record, I am one of the 21% who believe it is poor sportsmanship and 1 of the people who do not have anything against you.
I also believe many of 'no' voters were just because they want to be against my idea. Still, given the circumstances, 21% of 'yes' votes is quite high.
josko.ri wrote:The case was also brought to attention of king achilles and he concluded that decision from TO should be respected. Therefore, the decision that this IS bad sportmanship should officially be respected, according to king achilles ruling.
i-andrei wrote:Btw, i can brag now i won an Antarctica series against you 3-0. That is one of my worst maps and i am not a top 100 player here so not sure what you can tell about that.
Swimmerdude99 wrote:josko.ri wrote:The case was also brought to attention of king achilles and he concluded that decision from TO should be respected. Therefore, the decision that this IS bad sportmanship should officially be respected, according to king achilles ruling.
Was this before or after this post was started? Because if this should be respected, a poll makes no sense unless you are trying to see if the community agrees with you, which it clearly does not.
You then showboating how 21% of players are being screwed over by "loophole abusers" like you've just proved some point, just shows that you can't understand that others in the majority might not agree with you. You are a great player, strategist and often have good points, but this thread might be one of the most egotistical threads I've seen, barring some Naruto and P@P postings.
Its also ironic to me that as you are a player who takes everything to the literal line to get a win, that you would even have a problem with this.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users