More "proof" that the scoring system is rigged

by **Timminz** on Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:29 pm

chaosfactor wrote:so gotta pee?

Why do not all the high ranking players hang out and play the high ranking players till the end do us part?

Can you see the flaw in that my friend:?

How did the high ranking players get their rank....?

When a blue question mark, and a red question mark, love each other very, very much....

by **mpjh** on Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:32 pm

The classic demure -- So What -- Miles Davis got it right -- play it cool, hot, loud, soft, but play.

by **chaosfactor** on Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:36 pm

I can see for Miles and 'Miles',

I can fortunately see through your noise to arrive at a conclusion, which is

If you are complaining on this Thread, you cannot play risk.

by **steve066** on Mon Aug 04, 2008 11:27 pm

liberty your point is that the ranks of the top cc players are not legitimate because they have
gained their points against a small % of potential unique opponents.

do you have any data to support that position?

why do you insist # of unique opponents equates to legitimacy of player rank?

by analogy the records of major league baseball players are meaningless because they don't
play minor leaguers or little leaguers.

I've been up there and its the hardest thing of all to maintain a top rank.

you seem to be saying that anyone who has a higher rank than you doesn't deserve it.

if you want to play with the big kids you need to earn the right by winning your way to
top echelon just as the players currently there have done.

by **mpjh** on Mon Aug 04, 2008 11:44 pm

I don't think Liberty is amenable to changing or moderating his opinion, or suggesting an alternative to the current system of ranking. Unfortunately he has decided to piss into a strong wind. Send him some tp.

by **chaosfactor** on Mon Aug 04, 2008 11:55 pm

More proof that there are more whining saps online.

Have you ever played poker with hardened criminals, and told them their dice were loaded?

How about truth or dare with a girl (with breasts boyz), did you complain at the first call??
(Or did your Y-fronts get caught in the zipper?)

How about when you Challenged your IQ rank against your Mothers, and lost when she told you that you do not come out from her bum....

The Game is called Risk.

Google "Risk"

Or look it up, either or, it means "taking a chance".

by **mpjh** on Tue Aug 05, 2008 12:06 am

It is not Risk. Risk is a copyrighted board game owned by Hasbro. This is an online site with a number of games on it that require the players to conquer other players through strategy and chance.

by **owenshooter** on Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:52 am

ctgottapee wrote:[note: if you look at your 'ratings left' tab, you'll see that you can withdraw them, so they can be erased.]

yeah, by the person that left the rating. not by a "rating mod" or the person that received the poor rating. soooo, of very little help if you have an issue and the person will not voluntarily remove it...-0

by **chaosfactor** on Tue Aug 05, 2008 2:02 am

mpjh wrote:It is not Risk. Risk is a copyrighted board game owned by Hasbro. This is an online site with a number of games on it that require the players to conquer other players through strategy and chance.

No Shit!!

I thought it was snap!!

by **ctgottapee** on Tue Aug 05, 2008 3:27 am

there should be no issue here; ratings moderation defeat the whole point of ratings. they are player generated and decided

you shouldn't be able to determine how others rate you
their opinions/ratings of you are theirs to offer, the ratings are a determination of the players, not of the moderators judging who cries to mommy best

if you get an unjustified rating or two, it doesn't matter, as others do as well and other players can see through that. now when 30 players rate you shit then you have problems

owenshooter wrote:
ctgottapee wrote:[note: if you look at your 'ratings left' tab, you'll see that you can withdraw them, so they can be erased.]

yeah, by the person that left the rating. not by a "rating mod" or the person that received the poor rating. soooo, of very little help if you have an issue and the person will not voluntarily remove it...-0

by **chaosfactor** on Tue Aug 05, 2008 4:21 pm

I have a Medal factory of my own,
It is the anti-dis-establishment version of CC.
I also run a chain of bars in the US called "Meddlesome Bars"

If you step over to the FW division you can earn yourself a Meddle of Honour, simply by being a flame warrior.

by **mpjh** on Tue Aug 05, 2008 6:31 pm

jpliberty wrote:
ParadiceCity9 wrote:jpuberty is still goin at this huh...

yes, and you have yet to mention anything which shows you to have an independent, actual thinking mind. Are you capable of making any statement of your own? Must you so blatantly hide behind your own solicitations for others to attack me? Do you have no personal pride, no actual balls?

Do you have a mind? Or,do you follow. In my answer to an immediately previous post I mentioned the sheep. BAA.

Were did you go, Liberty. The retarded flamers seemed to have taken over your thread. I kinda liked your anarchism, hate to see you quit.

by **e_i_pi** on Fri Oct 17, 2008 11:15 am

RANDOM RESURRECT!!!

by **Prankcall** on Fri Oct 17, 2008 11:38 am

Give those high ranking bastards the hell they deserve..The damn leeches suck the life out of CC.We need more idiots I mean players like Jp.Your the best man and I aim to be just as good as you sir.