yeti_c wrote:I'm here to spam and whine up the forums - I can do that for free - so suck on that biatches.
C.
Oh man how this made me laugh...
Moderator: Community Team
yeti_c wrote:I'm here to spam and whine up the forums - I can do that for free - so suck on that biatches.
C.
Pedronicus wrote:I'm not going to re new my premium. I've had about as much as I can take from the frigging dice.
Earlier today I had a game where I had 9 to start with on one territory. my bonuses = 18, so 27 armies to attack with. virtually all enemy territories had 1 on.
3 minutes later, all my 27 gone - 8 enemy armies killed. all 3v1.
The game is in the bag, but with these dice - it just pisses me off.
I've also watched people attacking me in RT games and evidently my defending dice are equally as shit as my my attacking dice.
decoulombe wrote:=D> Bravo Optimus. I love it when people paraphrase me
gdeangel wrote:Ratings IDK... I would probably plunk down the cash if (1) the site were more reliable, and had better performance in crittical connection round trip time (i.e., why play speed when I would have dice time out syndrome every other roll), (2) if the points per game were on a 10-50 flat rate, rather than a 0-100 asymtotic or there were some other way to decide the size of your points bet on any game, and (3) if they fixed the logic on drops / neutral positions on 90% of the maps, which are given to making 1 in 10 games unwinable.
And, of course, if they go rid of random.org and generated a new file from a physical dice simulator.
The OP suggested that bias, but don't let that put you off. Answer the question as it stands. If ratings affect your answer so be it. If other things that are more important to you affect your answer, again fine. Answer accordingly. Fortunately the OP made the best kind of poll - one where you can change your mind.Scott-Land wrote:Ha, when I posted I didn't realize this was ratings related- to clarify, ratings have no bearing on me renewing or not. Me's should read more carefully.
cicero wrote:The OP suggested that bias, but don't let that put you off. Answer the question as it stands. If ratings affect your answer so be it. If other things that are more important to you affect your answer, again fine. Answer accordingly. Fortunately the OP made the best kind of poll - one where you can change your mind.Scott-Land wrote:Ha, when I posted I didn't realize this was ratings related- to clarify, ratings have no bearing on me renewing or not. Me's should read more carefully.
Myself I'd be curious to read this thread again in 12 months and see how many of us who voted* yes were still premium and, perhaps more interestingly, how many who voted* no were still premium.
[* Voted and posted to confirm their position of course; since voting is invisible.]
So, for the record, "yes".
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users