by Votanic on Thu Nov 02, 2023 2:52 pm
Okay, if admitting randomness in a random situation is considered scummy, I will try too parse out the reasons for these BT votes.
This is hard... I have three windows open just to write this post.
Of course, I'm ignoring canceled votes...and if they aren't written in red, forget it.
swang votes Pixar becaue it worked well voting for him first in the last game...
Sonic votes Traf because Traf didn't want to vote for Pixar... and because he was 'silent'.
Charle votes Traf because he agrees with Sonic, and wants to vote for an experienced player.
Both EW & PIxar vote Charle because he keeps trying to start bandwagons.(Charle changed his vote, twice)
Ragian votes Dega because he "isn't adding much" (silent).
Strikewolf votes dega "to see if a bit of pressure has an influence".
Traf votes Dega "Cause I think he has have enough time to come up with something but haven't, plus is a good player so sounds a good BT target".
Well, that's clear as mud.
Experienced players accusing others of being experienced comes off as odd.
Though of course those accusing experienced players (PRESUMABLY) know that they themselves are town but not that the others are.
swang's reason vor voting Pixar has no meaning to me, having not been in the previous game. Does it make sense to players who were in that game?
I would guess not, since nobody else agreed (EW did briefly, but then changed his vote)
So now it is:
Blood Test Vote:
(1) Pixar - Swang
(2) Traf - Sonic, Charle
(2) Charle - EW, Pixar
(3) Dega - Ragian, Strike, Traf
I was hoping to end this post by adding my vote... but no, not yet. There really is nothing to hang my hat on, and I don't want to keep hopping different randwagons and changing my vote.
Causing that kind of confusion does seem scummy to me, though I'm not really pointing a finger at Charle, or anybody else, just saying that it is good not to be fickle.
I was amazed we were given a whole week just to make nothing into something, but maybe it will take that long.