Skittles! wrote:ADDITIONAL INFO ABOUT POKEMON FIGHTS (to be updated as necessary)
1. Each time a pokemon levels up, he or she is completely healed.
2. Leveling and awarding perks after leveling takes place AFTER all the Night's actions have been resolved. So, if you level up, you will be healed after the night ends. If you survive, that is.
3. I will send you your Nightly feedbacks, AFTER I post the Day-scene, possibly over a Day or two, depending on how busy I am in RL. The point of this is to save time and shorten the Nights.
The order in which I send feedbacks is going to be serpentine, meaning that on Night 1, dakky receives his feedback (if any), first and Kwanton receives his (if any) last; on the Night 2 Kwanton receives his (if any) first and so forth.
4. TRAINERS: If you are controlling a big pokemon, you may not order it to eat a little pokemon. Let's keep it clean out there.
Upon re-reading the rules.
HOW DARE YOU! This is the type of behavoir reserved for only the lowest of the low. Reading the rules? Don't you know you're supposed to ignore the first post!? IT'S A TRADITION. HOW ELSE CAN WE ASK QUESTIONS THAT WERE CLEARLY EXPLAINED? We're supposed to be lazy and annoying, not resourceful!
kwanton wrote:BuJaber wrote:First of all did Kwanton really vote for himself? and if so... why the hell is he still on a joke vote?
Yeah. I do that every game. It's my thing. Ask the other vets.
unvotevote kwanton
I can confirm this.
new guy1 wrote:@Fircoal, I can see what you mean by not being required to throw your vote every time you make a new post, it’s that his indecision for any case at all this late in the day doesn’t advance the day anywhere, and as has been mentioned by someone else, it doesn’t let the more vigilant players observe their voting patterns.
I mean yes votes are good but at the same time we do have talk which is also good. Not as good as votes but it's important. I don't see the issue with bringing up many points of view and being undecided. The fact that one brings up those thoughts and posts them gives us something to springboard off of. It's much better than nothing.
strike wolf wrote:Sorry. Meant to get on yesterday but got side tracked.
A bit hypocritical for me to say as one of the former essay kings but I am a bit uncomfortable with the number of book report type posts in this thread that despite length either come to the same conclusions or no conclusion at all. Then there is nag who broke his post into smaller pieces and concluded it by voting a safe target in an inactive.
Would agree on Mets seeming a bit quiet.
Posting now before my comp shuts down. Be back when it reboots.
Eh again I really don't see the point, if things are being brought up that's good. Even if teh same conclusions are being met it shows something. It shows a willingness to go along with the crowd, or more support behind a certain argument. More words is usually good for the town as there is more to dig though. If there is something scummy about these posts then what is it? It's true there may be scummy behavoir lurking in the essay posts but you need to bring those up and discuss them rather than just bring up the problems with a certain type. Furthmore, conclusions are hard to come up with espeically with mixed feelings. Let me use you for an example. This quote I'm quote looking suspcious to me because it seems like you're trying to quiet people from posting longer posts. However in the very next post you bring up Kwanton and provide reasoning to believe while you feel like he hasn't been adding as much as he could hve and has appeared active more than being active. That is a good thing imo. Now a good post imo who bring both of these facts up as they are realivent to the game. However the end result of them cancel out leaving no strong conclusion. I don't think there's anything wrong with that. There's a difference between being wishy-washy and trying to see both sides. If you want certain posts or stances scummy bring them up. Don't hint at them.
TimWoodbury wrote:so after reading through its been mentioned that there is a good possability that the trainers/pokemon pair know each other and chances of them being cult recruiters. this id have to say makes since.
so heres what were looking at right now for teams/groups
team rocket
trainer/pokemon pair
wild pokemon
now 1 crazy out there thought im gonna throw in where we have 20 some odd people we know gary is most likley in the game wich means ash is prolly in it, whats there long term goal other then catching them all...defeating the elite 4... im thinking the elite 4 are also in the game.
with that said i meant to do this a while ago unvote vote Anarkistsdream with the slip up a few pages ago saying we instead of they and other things he aint sitting right.
as others have said mitch is THE wildcard he can be good or bad and say stupid stuff and get himself killed early on his more better info seems to come on the few games where he dont kill himself early on so lets keep him alive a couple of days
Why are you bringing up a bunch of things that aren't relevant. I know you said you skimmed the last couple of pages because you're not used to it in your last post but sorry dude you're going to have to get used to it. Also I think we covered that voted AD is not a good idea at this point. And yet you do it. Do you have anything to say for yourself?
Anarkistsdream wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:@Nark: usually wincons are written separately, especially when quoting role PMs is allowed. Otherwise it would be too easy for "town", or whatever passes for town these days to clear each other.
Here's a link to a very recent Pokemon-themed game that mandy played in and may have inspired him somewhat.
Note the separate-written win-cons and the double wins for those who aren't sure how that would work.
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=610&t=219243&start=475#p4847831
OK.. Trying to show how you are right by using your OWN game as proof isn't exactly convincing, there, dude. By all means, show me at least two other games, if you want to try to prove a point... Mentioning your own just pushes your own agenda without actual proof.
But to be fair it exists. It's not like it's impossible to find because it is findable. ESpeically since all of the games here are public it's not like there's any difference between bringing up one's own game or another's. I personally bring up my games all the time. Part because I can see when they fit and part because I'm egotistical.
ew mafiascum.
HotShot53 wrote:mandalorian2298 wrote:Ragian wrote:Anyoen care for my thoughts on Marashu? Also, do we have a deadline, Mandy the Mod?
No. If you guys end up feeling like no one is going to be able to get 14 votes then you can vote 'No lynch', but I'm not going to force your hand. The activity is good (2 pages per day) so there is no need for me to meddle. Days 1 and 2 are usually the longest once. (search "Sherwood Mafia" if you don't believe me
)
Lol, based on past experience, someone voting "no lynch" will end the day for sure, as whoever votes it would get lynched.
A Catch 22!
Serbia wrote:dakky21 wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Who on earth is Spurgistan? Have they made a post?
You skimming too? PM the mod aka Mandy with those questions... he said it twice if I'm correct.
I don't believe Wing is ACTUALLY asking who Spurg is, dakky. It's more a comment on lack of activity.
I think that's dakky's point, that it's the mod's jurisdiction.
Talapus wrote: A LONG POST
HEllo and welcome back Tal. I don't have to say to your posts itself because I don't disagree with what you're saying. Furthermore I like how you are bringing them up and putting them out there. That is all good for otown. I do belive that you do have a good reason to suspect him. He is trying to push his agenda too hard. However from my own point of view I do have a gut feeling that MM isn't actually bad. This does seem like the type of heavoir that I've seen from him in the past. Furthermore I have a harder time believeing that he slipped up so badly so early if he was scum. None of this is concrete I know but that is the reading that I have on him.
BuJaber wrote:MM - Yes his posts seems innocent. The best scum are the best actors. So let's not let tone dictate how we look at the post contents. His lynch should provide the most answers. That is why I am now even happier leaving my vote on him. It is a longer-term strategy vote. However, if another person becomes more than just "could or could not be scum" then we should change to them. There are some people who we could assume, at least for now, that they are NOT scum. MM doesn't fit this category, so he's a decent lynch.
Kwanton - A sense of humor is great to have. And this is my first game with you and I already like you. However, answering my question by Unvoting yourself then revoting yourself? Sorry -- I can't see any logical reason a townie would do that. At least not a townie that cares about the game.
Dakky - Healthy level of skepticism he's showing, but based on previous experiences, less talking, less sticking his neck out with his opinions, less voting activity in general. Maybe it's just the size of the game, which is overwhelming I admit, but worth noting.
Let's go one by one.
@MM - Eh, what would his lynch answer? You're staying it'll provide teh most answers but what will it give us. I can see how he's suspcious but I don't think lynching him makes any more answers compared to anyone else. Also I counter that he's a good actor, but then again if he's scum he's also not the best scum either.
(Sorry MM)
@Kwan, the reason why is that he's Kwan. I think he'd do that regardless of role.
@Dakky, granted I've never played with Dakky but at the same time I don't think he's doing anything suspicious. He says things that come out of nowhere, but at the same time it does seem like he's trying to figure out the game and who the scum are. That's good. I think it might look less to us due to the amount of posts we've been making. Each person's contributions will look lessor with more and more posts stacking up.
madmitch wrote:First of all unvote I think MM is a trainer but not for Team Rocket and that team cannot win ,it is not best for a lot of us. I believe Tim is a trainer for Team Rocket and since legion seems to be protecting him he must be one of tims pokemons. I believe Dakky could belong to that team also ,not sure yet as what. Here are my other thoughts Doom - pokemon,exile -pokemon, sam- wild pokemon, Wcg trainor with possible two pokemons Nark and Nag. so I will vote Tim
What? I mean I like how you're at least putting out your beliefs. That's good. Yet I fail to see any reasons behind those thoughts. Do you have any reasons?
Serbia wrote: Tim reacted to a mention of scum faction, then tried to leave it alone. That's scummy.
VOTE: Timmy
was fp by new guy.
Hmmmm... This seems like bandwagon jumpping. You were the 4th vote on MAsket at the time (granted one of those votes were mine, and now the 3rd vote on Tim. It feels like your votes seem to be drifting along with what the general consenious of the thread is. This was your Masket vote:
Serbia wrote:I posted this back on page 9. I think it's important to bring back up.
Serbia wrote:I went back and re-read, and will share the actual order of events here:
dakky21 wrote:And btw Serb, you are allowed to voted mandy, but that would be scummy just as is DY's voting Confirm. Actually, even mentioning you'd vote Mandy is scummy. If you don't care who will you vote, then you must be Team Rocket. I'll keep my vote on DY's joke confirm but you're the serious candidate now for something more real.
TimWoodbury wrote:Doom why mention team rocket who says they even in the game are you team rocket??
So in reality, it was DAKKY who automatically accused me of being Rocket. Tim followed it up with a question, which once ignored he let lie. My opinion? With Tim, I think it more likely he was legitimately asking the question, then moving on. With dakky, I'm not as confident. Maybe HE'S the Scum Genius immediately looking for a claim, since he's the one who actually brought it up. He's also the one who revenge voted me (scummy) and is throwing suspicions around like party favors, which also feels reckless and scummy. For now, my vote stands.
(I added the bold and large to this post - it did not exist in my original)
The first person to mention Team Rocket was dakky, not Tim. I know when I was considering voting for Tim, it's because I thought he brought it up, but he clearly was responding to dakky.
So, the two people in my mind who are most scummy are dakky and Masket, and I'd give an edge to Masket over this, because a role claim is worse than a faction identity suggestion, especially when that faction is known to be part of the story arc. (something which again, I have no idea of, as I never played the card game, haven't pokemon go'd, and never watched a second of any cartoon. I'm an old guy I guess) I still am suspicious of mitch, for his blasé vote, but perhaps less so when I think about it in reference to the other two.
UNVOTE VOTE: MasketJust got fp by the mod
In my view, neither of your posts really give concrete reasons for their votes besides a small little blurb. For the shifting sands of this game that feels a bit light. ..Oh what is this? It looks like in here ytou have a question from yourself saying that Tim was just asking a question while Dakky was too blame. This is quite a turn around you've had. Why is that? Might it have anything to do with the game the chances of Tim getting lynched? With MM's vote count stalling and getting lower seems like a nice time to pile it onto someone else doesn't it.
While I do still find Mitch's lack of contributions and general demeanor as scummy, I do note that it seems that he is like Dakky and Tim in that this behavoir isn't that abnormal for him. (Something I did not know before hand.) I do still hold my suspisions of him however due to his attitude. However for now I think Serbia and his vote flopping needs a little pressure. So here you go.
Unvote. Vote: Serbia
