WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Welcome to the Confirmed Town team MadMitch. Lets do this
vote wing for not running it by me (Team Captain) before adding members.
Moderator: Community Team
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Welcome to the Confirmed Town team MadMitch. Lets do this
persianempire wrote:its when ur food goes bad... you get spoils
persianempire wrote:its when ur food goes bad... you get spoils
madmitch wrote:I must be mad or stupid,I can,t font red,someone tell me how please
persianempire wrote:its when ur food goes bad... you get spoils
dakky21 wrote:You didn't said in the first post the votes must be in red. Anyway, that means a lot of votes are invalid, including mine.... Well then...
for now ... till we have some more evidence...
Vote No lynch
persianempire wrote:its when ur food goes bad... you get spoils
Endgame422 wrote:This is my 3rd game(second C9) so im by no means the expert but the idea behind no lynch being a no go on day one is you need the information.
2 days without lynching a goon(and 1 or 2 night kills) and the games going to mafia as the smaller number of players means you gotta be quick.
In number of days anyways, no hasty decisions here if we can avoid it.
Lets say we no lynch tonight and i get murdered in my bed.
now its 4town 2scum.
If we lynch a townie there its 3town with the night kill its 2/2 and game goes mafia.
Where as we lynch a townie today and mafia will likely be involved in that,gives our cop/doc more info on who to investigate/save as well as more information for day two where we HAVE to hit scum or its over.
Plus if we hit one of the 2 goons d-1 we will have smooth sailing from there.
persianempire wrote:its when ur food goes bad... you get spoils
NoSurvivors wrote:Unvote-- no need to put someone at L-2 yet, especially in a newbie game. Things could get hairy.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Welcome to the Confirmed Town team MadMitch. Lets do this
vote wing for not running it by me (Team Captain) before adding members.
NoSurvivors wrote:Dakky, you seem to be fairly confident in the no lynch. Sell me on it. Why so quick? I must agree with endgames point about getting at least a bit of info.
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:@Slander - Why vote for the host?
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:@Slander - Why vote for the host?
Slander please answer the question
dakky21 wrote:NoSurvivors wrote:Dakky, you seem to be fairly confident in the no lynch. Sell me on it. Why so quick? I must agree with endgames point about getting at least a bit of info.
How did you come to the conclusion I am fairly confident when I said "at least for now". Based on the current evidence, I just don't know who to vote... yet. If this will make you happier: UNVOTE no lynch
After few more pages of the thread, I'm sure we will have more evidence and more information on who is scum and who is not.
persianempire wrote:its when ur food goes bad... you get spoils
madmitch wrote:lets try this again,forget about my no vote ,it is foolish.I am taking the stairway to Heaven and Iwant to take nos .VOTE NO SURRENDER, He seems to be switching votes to much.it might mean somethingor not.
persianempire wrote:its when ur food goes bad... you get spoils
NoSurvivors wrote:dakky21 wrote:NoSurvivors wrote:Dakky, you seem to be fairly confident in the no lynch. Sell me on it. Why so quick? I must agree with endgames point about getting at least a bit of info.
How did you come to the conclusion I am fairly confident when I said "at least for now". Based on the current evidence, I just don't know who to vote... yet. If this will make you happier: UNVOTE no lynch
After few more pages of the thread, I'm sure we will have more evidence and more information on who is scum and who is not.
I am just curious as to why you wanted a no lynch before we got any information out of anyone or had any time to make a case against anyone acting scummy (and if you didn't want no lynch, why did you vote for it)?
@Slander - Why vote for the host?
Thats the third time I've asked Slander for an explanation.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users