Moderator: Community Team
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!
evilchaos wrote:Here is a summary of what we have so far:
With 13 players, it is likely that there are 3 scum total. Two would be way underpowered, four would be a bit overpowered (especially with a lyncher).
Commander9 - likely Town (claimed Chef, no counter-claim)
TA1LGUNN3R - Town (confirmed bartender-like role by 40k, who is a confirmed investigator)
Talapus - likely Town (claimed Butters, no counter-claim)
evilchaos - Town (claimed Kyle, no counter-claim)
-----
kratos644 - likely town, but it's a tough "back-and-forth" case that brought me to that conclusion
- investigated by Tail, who got a result of "he should be on the police force himself"
- This could mean he has a gun and is mafia
- Could mean he is a shining beacon of all that is good
- He's playing like he did in Quickie Maf as scum
- generally passive instead of aggressive (could just be his entire meta, I haven't seen one of his town games)
- He's claimed Doctor:
- doesn't match with "should be on the police force," imo
- there has been a kill every night, no saves
- N3 Kill of Chapcrap (deciding factor on whether or not he's scum for me)
- Chapcrap (Kenny) is human shield (probably means that he protects, but dies if he targets who the scum targets)
- scum had no reason to target chapcrap directly, but they did kill him N3 after kratos claimed doc
- It's likely that Chapcrap targeted kratos because he claimed doc and was killed defending him
-----
/ - SCUM
- lala was outed by 40k as scum in D4
- pushed for a no lynch all day...why?
- also, process of elimination
Strike wolf - scum?
- completely by process of elimination, reevaluate after we lynch /
Vote /
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:I investigated /, couldn't get a read other than I may have spotted a gun on him. With his defense of lala yesterday, I'd say he's a scummy. However, we shouldn't rush this immediately, we need to try and find the other (I'm thinking that 3 of the original 13 would be mafs). I'll see if I can find anything else out.
-Tails
What about Commander though? This line here makes him suspicious.blakebowling wrote:Oddly enough, there was a small bowl and a spoon abandoned nearby.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
evilchaos wrote:Why did your plans center around a watcher when we don't know whether or not a watcher is in the game?
strike wolf wrote:So despite kratos, / and even commander to a lesser extent having questionable roles and you believing there to be two scum left so I have to be scum by process of elimination. Come back when you have a real case to make.
/ wrote:evilchaos wrote:Why did your plans center around a watcher when we don't know whether or not a watcher is in the game?
It's quite a common role, and due to certain information I know, I assume there is one, the reason I did not try to confirm this is did not want to put the watcher (if there is one) in a compromising position, (since it would use up the doc). However my plan could have possibly worked without a watcher, mafia is a game of deceptions and bluffs, if I insisted and hinted enough that the person was being watched they would have no choice but to go along with the intended targets, then I could make my deductions.
evilchaos wrote:strike wolf wrote:So despite kratos, / and even commander to a lesser extent having questionable roles and you believing there to be two scum left so I have to be scum by process of elimination. Come back when you have a real case to make.
Kratos doesn't have a questionable role in my opinion. Scum would have tried to kill him during the night. He was also (based on all claims) the most likely target for a protect if one was available. Magically, a human shield died. Connect the dots? I am 90% sure that Kratos was the kill target at Night 3, meaning he wasn't scum.
The entire case against Com9 is that soup is killing people and he is a chef. Chef has never been someone bad in South Park. It doesn't make sense. Also, he claimed Chef when under no pressure. If he was scum (and therefore knew that soup would be connected to murder), why would he claim? Again, makes no sense. Come back when you have a real case to make.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!
evilchaos wrote:/ wrote:evilchaos wrote:Why did your plans center around a watcher when we don't know whether or not a watcher is in the game?
It's quite a common role, and due to certain information I know, I assume there is one, the reason I did not try to confirm this is did not want to put the watcher (if there is one) in a compromising position, (since it would use up the doc). However my plan could have possibly worked without a watcher, mafia is a game of deceptions and bluffs, if I insisted and hinted enough that the person was being watched they would have no choice but to go along with the intended targets, then I could make my deductions.
You were relying on a plan that would confirm scum members as scum. Why would they play along? Because if they thought they were being watched they would have no other choice.
If we went with that plan, scum would have just killed you if you were town. If I had died it would have exposed kratos as not being a doc and therefore scum. If scum was who you thought it was, they could play it off as opportunistic scum trying to frame them. if lalaland was the scum it would have resulted in no death, as it would have been straight suicide to avoid the target. If scum wasn't who you thought it was, they just got a great opportunity to completely confuse town the next day. if lalaland wasn't the scum there would be a separate kill all together, as the scum would have no choice but to try to eliminated key targets before the results could have been realised We would come out knowing nothing because of the insane amount of WIFOM involved. three simple variables to confirm the process of elimination.
And how did a no lynch help your plan? Why should you ever not lynch someone that turned up a guilty investigation? as I had said, for a game this size with a vote blocking variable a mislynch +kill +block could have resulted in a loss depending on the mafia's size, if it was delayed and the plan implemented with it's second phase we could easily weed out the vote blocker, and the other scum as well without error. At best, you've just lynched scum. At worst, you mislynched but now know that the claimed cop is scum. and if the cop was fake, or mistaken because of other variables, it would have left us potentially 3 scum vs three usable voters, a game lost. The no lynch that you pushed for made no sense.
Talapus wrote:The soup thing is messed up all around. I do think chef is a good character in Southpark, however with what we've seen in this game so far and now a day with no one getting sick, I think we need to keep an eye on it. As for ? you seem a bit out of sorts. IT's almost like to seem to know something or think you know something b ut won't clue the rest of us in. First the push for a no lynch which is almost never the best idea and now telling us your role is common but not giving us anything else to go off of. Why should we trust you?
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users