Moderator: Community Team
Hunter S. Thompson wrote:The Edge... There is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over..
saxitoxin wrote:tzor wrote:Ah yes, another Saxi out of context quote ... let's use a better source ...
Your belief is that "theyeshivaworld.com" is a better source than Israel's oldest newspaper, Haaretz?
tzor wrote:saxitoxin wrote:tzor wrote:Ah yes, another Saxi out of context quote ... let's use a better source ...
Your belief is that "theyeshivaworld.com" is a better source than Israel's oldest newspaper, Haaretz?
No way, it was the only source that had the complete context quote. I said CONTEXT not BIAS.
Haaretz wrote:Reuven Rivlin is lucky he’s a politician in Israel. Were he a politician in the United States, he’d be labeled an anti-Semite and likely forced from his job.
saxitoxin wrote:tzor wrote:saxitoxin wrote:tzor wrote:Ah yes, another Saxi out of context quote ... let's use a better source ...
Your belief is that "theyeshivaworld.com" is a better source than Israel's oldest newspaper, Haaretz?
No way, it was the only source that had the complete context quote. I said CONTEXT not BIAS.
Your belief is that the fly-by-night religious lunatic blog "theyeshivaworld.com" is a paragon of unbiased journalism, while Israel's oldest newspaper - Haaretz - is a pro-Palestinian mouthpiece?
Metsfanmax wrote:saxitoxin wrote:tzor wrote:saxitoxin wrote:tzor wrote:Ah yes, another Saxi out of context quote ... let's use a better source ...
Your belief is that "theyeshivaworld.com" is a better source than Israel's oldest newspaper, Haaretz?
No way, it was the only source that had the complete context quote. I said CONTEXT not BIAS.
Your belief is that the fly-by-night religious lunatic blog "theyeshivaworld.com" is a paragon of unbiased journalism, while Israel's oldest newspaper - Haaretz - is a pro-Palestinian mouthpiece?
No, he believed that the blog had the full quote, whereas Haaretz did not. Stop being an idiot please.
saxitoxin wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:saxitoxin wrote:tzor wrote:saxitoxin wrote:tzor wrote:Ah yes, another Saxi out of context quote ... let's use a better source ...
Your belief is that "theyeshivaworld.com" is a better source than Israel's oldest newspaper, Haaretz?
No way, it was the only source that had the complete context quote. I said CONTEXT not BIAS.
Your belief is that the fly-by-night religious lunatic blog "theyeshivaworld.com" is a paragon of unbiased journalism, while Israel's oldest newspaper - Haaretz - is a pro-Palestinian mouthpiece?
No, he believed that the blog had the full quote, whereas Haaretz did not. Stop being an idiot please.
Mets racing to the defense of a Bible Prophecy blog? The sequel is never as good as the original.
saxitoxin wrote:That said, I love "theyeshivaworld.com"'s ads ... it appears they have a very broad, diverse, well-adjusted, intelligent, normal audience for their little blog ... definitely not a bunch of religious whackos ...
saxitoxin wrote:Your belief is that the fly-by-night religious lunatic blog "theyeshivaworld.com" is a paragon of unbiased journalism, while Israel's oldest newspaper - Haaretz - is a pro-Palestinian mouthpiece? Once again ...
tzor wrote:saxitoxin wrote:Your belief is that the fly-by-night religious lunatic blog "theyeshivaworld.com" is a paragon of unbiased journalism, while Israel's oldest newspaper - Haaretz - is a pro-Palestinian mouthpiece? Once again ...
No, I believe your are a racist, antisemitic, pro-genocidal, (insert your favorite insulting noun here). I also believe you can't understand anything unless it is written on a dead, old tuna and slapped across your face.
I said CONTEXT
CONTEXT
CONTEXT
You are saying source
source
source
Reuven Rivlin wrote: I’m not asking if they’ve forgotten how to be Jews, but if they’ve forgotten how to be decent human beings. Have they forgotten how to converse?
tzor wrote:saxitoxin wrote:Your belief is that the fly-by-night religious lunatic blog "theyeshivaworld.com" is a paragon of unbiased journalism, while Israel's oldest newspaper - Haaretz - is a pro-Palestinian mouthpiece? Once again ...
No, I believe your are a racist, antisemitic, pro-genocidal, (insert your favorite insulting noun here). I also believe you can't understand anything unless it is written on a dead, old tuna and slapped across your face.
I said CONTEXT
CONTEXT
CONTEXT
You are saying source
source
source
Lord Arioch wrote:nah sweden recognize palestine as a coutnry
shickingbrits wrote:Thats two years old.
saxitoxin wrote:By a vote of 174-6, the United Nations has demanded Israel immediately surrender its nuclear weapons and turn all its nuclear facilities to the control of the International Atomic Energy Agency.
Voting against the resolution was Israel, the U.S. (controlled by Israel), Canada (controlled by the U.S.), the Federated States of Micronesia (population 106,000), the Marshall Islands (population 68,000), and Palau (population 18,000).
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/d ... inspectors
notyou2 wrote:saxitoxin wrote:By a vote of 174-6, the United Nations has demanded Israel immediately surrender its nuclear weapons and turn all its nuclear facilities to the control of the International Atomic Energy Agency.
Voting against the resolution was Israel, the U.S. (controlled by Israel), Canada (controlled by the U.S.), the Federated States of Micronesia (population 106,000), the Marshall Islands (population 68,000), and Palau (population 18,000).
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/d ... inspectors
those last 3, why would they support Israel keeping nukes? Weren't they all testing grounds? Are they hoping Israel will pay them to test on their soil again?
Saxitoxinsource wrote:The resolution, adopted in a 161-5 vote, noted that Israel is the only Middle Eastern country that is not party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. It called on Israel to “accede to that treaty without further delay, not to develop, produce test or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons, to renounce possession of nuclear weapons” and put its nuclear facilities under the safeguard of the UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency.
The United States and Canada were among four countries that joined Israel in opposing the measure, while 18 countries abstained.
Read more: UN approves Arab-backed call for Israel to renounce nukes | The Times of Israel http://www.timesofisrael.com/un-approve ... z3KneRfgjj
Follow us: @timesofisrael on Twitter | timesofisrael on Facebook
aage wrote: Maybe you're right, but since we receive no handlebars from the mod I think we should get some ourselves.
notyou2 wrote:saxitoxin wrote:By a vote of 174-6, the United Nations has demanded Israel immediately surrender its nuclear weapons and turn all its nuclear facilities to the control of the International Atomic Energy Agency.
Voting against the resolution was Israel, the U.S. (controlled by Israel), Canada (controlled by the U.S.), the Federated States of Micronesia (population 106,000), the Marshall Islands (population 68,000), and Palau (population 18,000).
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/d ... inspectors
those last 3, why would they support Israel keeping nukes? Weren't they all testing grounds? Are they hoping Israel will pay them to test on their soil again?
Hunter S. Thompson wrote:The Edge... There is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over..
Hunter S. Thompson wrote:The Edge... There is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over..
The journalism world is up in arms today that Chris Hughes the Facebook mogul who bought The New Republic magazine had the temerity to fire editor Franklin Foer and literary editor Leon Wieseltier, beheadings that have led to the resignation of twenty-some editors and writers at the magazine.
I’m not shedding any tears. So Leon Wieseltier is going to have to cut his hair and go out and suck up like the rest of us. He was a proponent of a feverish ideology, rightwing Zionism. He appeared on the main stage at AIPAC, the Israelis gave him a $1 million prize a year ago. The New Republic has for forty years been a bastion of the Israel lobby.
Having watched as a college student when Marty Peretz took over the New Republic 40 years ago and some other group of writers was up in arms, this shift strikes me as generational. This is a landmark in the era of the Jewish establishment. It’s petering out in an elite generation of far greater diversity.
http://mondoweiss.net/2014/12/curtain-n ... 7Jtkg.dpuf
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: No registered users