Moderator: Community Team
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
mrswdk wrote:In the video we can see a guy run into the path of oncoming race cars, get narrowly missed by one and then venture even further into the middle of the track before being hit by another. It looks to me like the collision was caused entirely by the pedestrian.
BigBallinStalin wrote:Looks like murder (or whatever it is when someone hits someone really hard but didn't intend on killing them). Reduce the sentence because the victim could've avoided the incident to some degree.
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
DaGip wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Looks like murder (or whatever it is when someone hits someone really hard but didn't intend on killing them). Reduce the sentence because the victim could've avoided the incident to some degree.
The prosecution would look to see if there was intent...swerving and gunning your engine was intent. If they run with that, Second Degree Murder would be what they seek; but as you said, they will reduce it at plea to either Voluntary or Involuntary Manslaughter...but beings Stewart knows that gunning your engine and swerving at a pedestrian could cause harm or death; it looks like the only possible plea he would have would be Voluntary Manslaughter.
mrswdk wrote:lol, classic. 'Everyone else thinks it was an accident. I guess I'd best argue that it was murder!'
BigBallinStalin wrote:mrswdk wrote:In the video we can see a guy run into the path of oncoming race cars, get narrowly missed by one and then venture even further into the middle of the track before being hit by another. It looks to me like the collision was caused entirely by the pedestrian.
Did ya see the part where the car swerves INTO him?
patches70 wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:mrswdk wrote:In the video we can see a guy run into the path of oncoming race cars, get narrowly missed by one and then venture even further into the middle of the track before being hit by another. It looks to me like the collision was caused entirely by the pedestrian.
Did ya see the part where the car swerves INTO him?
Really BBS? You can actually determine that as fact by that little bit of video?
I saw the camera focused on the guy, then a blue car narrowly misses him, the camera pans left following the blue car, then comes back quick just in time to see Stewart's red car hitting the guy. It looked like the car was sliding to me, which is pretty normal considering those sprint cars fishtail around curves. And they are on a curve, the guy isn't far from his wrecked car which wrecked in the curve.
I dunno man, I'm not sure you can say with any certainty that Stewart swerved into the guy on purpose. Physics trumps perception. Maybe if we had some video of Stewart further away, see what he and his car were doing besides the instant the car strikes the guy, one may be able to glean some better information.
The video in the OP, doesn't prove a thing except the guy was in the middle of the track, pissed off and not acting rationally and then (predictably) gets hit by a car. The guy probably wanted Stewart to stop so he could kick his ass and Ward thought that by standing in the path of Stewart's car would be enough to stop the car. Reality tells us that simply standing in front of a car won't stop it, brakes do, and brakes don't stop on a dime. Especially on tracks like that.
There is just not enough information in that video to determine Stewart murdered the guy. The very same problem a prosecutor is going to have, proving either murder or even manslaughter. It appears to be an accident with a major contributing factor the negligence of the driver Ward for striding into the middle of a race track with multiple vehicles rolling along.
Maybe you should have some better evidence than "It looks like murder to me!" Cause it doesn't look like murder to me. Apparently I'm not alone. Do you think courts work like that, BBS? "BBS says it looks like murder, others say it looks like an accident, I guess we'll just go with what BBS thinks, then. Guilty!"
Inconclusive video is inconclusive. More than enough reasonable doubt to make prosecution for murder or manslaughter a wasted effort. Get some better evidence, BBS.
nietzsche wrote:Those cars look ridiculous.
You'd think that someone who drives one of those wouldn't be so pissed about a crash and risk his life for it.
BigBallinStalin wrote:Yeah, I saw it again, and it's hard to tell. But it's not like he hit his brakes or anything.
BBS wrote:But in this case, I only saw the video, and it looked like he intentionally killed him.
BBS wrote: I don't know how 'sprint-cars' work.
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: No registered users