Moderator: Community Team
The ram wrote:We've put people on the moon, we can travel at the speed of sound and now the woke agenda that strives for total equality have just realised that men are stronger than women.
This massive breakthrough in human biology has finally been found due to the US Army, gender neutral fitness test. Which over 65% of women fail and 10% of men fail.
https://www.ladbible.com/news/latest-us ... e-20210314
Not to worry, I'm pretty sure that the test will be amended so more women can pass, because everyone in a warzone wants a physically and mentally inferior comrade by their side.
The ram wrote:We've put people on the moon, we can travel at the speed of sound and now the woke agenda that strives for total equality have just realised that men are stronger than women.
This massive breakthrough in human biology has finally been found due to the US Army, gender neutral fitness test. Which over 65% of women fail and 10% of men fail.
https://www.ladbible.com/news/latest-us ... e-20210314
Not to worry, I'm pretty sure that the test will be amended so more women can pass, because everyone in a warzone wants a physically and mentally inferior comrade by their side.
ConfederateSS wrote:No, The U.S. Military is getting rid of it all together...So,anyone can join...Yes, anyone...Which means, The USA will field the weakest army every to take the field of battle in History...
Dukasaur wrote:ConfederateSS wrote:No, The U.S. Military is getting rid of it all together...So,anyone can join...Yes, anyone...Which means, The USA will field the weakest army every to take the field of battle in History...
Considering that most fighting nowadays consists of pressing a button and watching a missile hit someone 15 miles away, physical strength hardly matters any more. It's not like you're going to engage in hand-to-hand unless you're in special forces, and special forces will retain their strict physical requirements.
jonesthecurl wrote:The ram wrote:We've put people on the moon, we can travel at the speed of sound and now the woke agenda that strives for total equality have just realised that men are stronger than women.
This massive breakthrough in human biology has finally been found due to the US Army, gender neutral fitness test. Which over 65% of women fail and 10% of men fail.
https://www.ladbible.com/news/latest-us ... e-20210314
Not to worry, I'm pretty sure that the test will be amended so more women can pass, because everyone in a warzone wants a physically and mentally inferior comrade by their side.
I'm sure there are those (likely including me, I've always been a wimp, and I'm ancient now as well) who are physically inferior to you. I doubt there are many mentally so.
Dukasaur wrote:ConfederateSS wrote:No, The U.S. Military is getting rid of it all together...So,anyone can join...Yes, anyone...Which means, The USA will field the weakest army every to take the field of battle in History...
Considering that most fighting nowadays consists of pressing a button and watching a missile hit someone 15 miles away, physical strength hardly matters any more. It's not like you're going to engage in hand-to-hand unless you're in special forces, and special forces will retain their strict physical requirements.
riskllama wrote:*pus
The ram wrote:jonesthecurl wrote:The ram wrote:We've put people on the moon, we can travel at the speed of sound and now the woke agenda that strives for total equality have just realised that men are stronger than women.
This massive breakthrough in human biology has finally been found due to the US Army, gender neutral fitness test. Which over 65% of women fail and 10% of men fail.
https://www.ladbible.com/news/latest-us ... e-20210314
Not to worry, I'm pretty sure that the test will be amended so more women can pass, because everyone in a warzone wants a physically and mentally inferior comrade by their side.
I'm sure there are those (likely including me, I've always been a wimp, and I'm ancient now as well) who are physically inferior to you. I doubt there are many mentally so.
Healthy body, healthy mind kiddo. And as in your own words you're physically a puss filled mangina, mentally I see no evidence to dispute that theory.Dukasaur wrote:ConfederateSS wrote:No, The U.S. Military is getting rid of it all together...So,anyone can join...Yes, anyone...Which means, The USA will field the weakest army every to take the field of battle in History...
Considering that most fighting nowadays consists of pressing a button and watching a missile hit someone 15 miles away, physical strength hardly matters any more. It's not like you're going to engage in hand-to-hand unless you're in special forces, and special forces will retain their strict physical requirements.
Do you actually think before you come out with your nonsense.
ConfederateSS wrote:It will always come down to "Boots on the Ground"...
The ram wrote:Do you actually think before you come out with your nonsense.
Dukasaur wrote:The ram wrote:Do you actually think before you come out with your nonsense.
Do you have some kind of point to make, or do you just spew random insults?
SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM
Almost all male US citizens and male immigrants, who are 18 through 25, are required to register with Selective Service.
US citizens or immigrants who are born male and changed their gender to female are still required to register. Individuals who are born female and changed their gender to male are not required to register.
https://www.sss.gov/register/who-needs-to-register/#p7
autoload wrote:
So almost 30 years ago (1991-1995), I was in the US Navy in a non combat role, at least not directly. I did the job in this picture, among about eight other jobs related to aircraft launch catapults. The me of today, due to specific training, can run long distances a lot faster than the me in the navy. That said, the me of today would be able to do that flight deck job probably one or two days before being pulled out for some medical issue. The me of yesteryear did that job upwards of 35 days in a row for 18 hours a day. It is a young person's job.
My point is that there are plenty of non combat, non special forces jobs that require a service member to be in better than average physical condition. Granted this is a navy example instead of army, but I think it correlates.
saxitoxin wrote:autoload wrote:
So almost 30 years ago (1991-1995), I was in the US Navy in a non combat role, at least not directly. I did the job in this picture, among about eight other jobs related to aircraft launch catapults. The me of today, due to specific training, can run long distances a lot faster than the me in the navy. That said, the me of today would be able to do that flight deck job probably one or two days before being pulled out for some medical issue. The me of yesteryear did that job upwards of 35 days in a row for 18 hours a day. It is a young person's job.
My point is that there are plenty of non combat, non special forces jobs that require a service member to be in better than average physical condition. Granted this is a navy example instead of army, but I think it correlates.
This post is too ambiguous. Please state clearly whether it is pro-Biden or pro-Trump so I can react to it appropriately by either saying "great point!" or "you're a moron." Thank you.
saxitoxin wrote:autoload wrote:
So almost 30 years ago (1991-1995), I was in the US Navy in a non combat role, at least not directly. I did the job in this picture, among about eight other jobs related to aircraft launch catapults. The me of today, due to specific training, can run long distances a lot faster than the me in the navy. That said, the me of today would be able to do that flight deck job probably one or two days before being pulled out for some medical issue. The me of yesteryear did that job upwards of 35 days in a row for 18 hours a day. It is a young person's job.
My point is that there are plenty of non combat, non special forces jobs that require a service member to be in better than average physical condition. Granted this is a navy example instead of army, but I think it correlates.
This post is too ambiguous. Please state clearly whether it is pro-Biden or pro-Trump so I can react to it appropriately by either saying "great point!" or "you're a moron." Thank you.
Return to Practical Explanation about Next Life,
Users browsing this forum: No registered users