Help
Play States
Play By Clickable Map
Deploy: Click on territory to deploy, choose number to deploy and click again to make deployment
Assault: Click on a territory to Assault from, then on a territory to Assault (right click to Auto Assault)
Advance: Click on conquered territory to choose to advance, choose number to advance, then click again to advance. Click on conquering territory to advance zero.
Reinforce: Click on a territory to Reinforce from, then on a territory to Reinforce to. Click again to confirm.
Play By Keyboard and Mouse
N Key: Skip to next game, Jump to next game
B Key: Begin Turn
E Key: End Deployment, End Assaults, End Reinforcement
L Key: Later (decline to play spoils)
W,S Keys: Increase/decrease troop quantity (slow)
Q,A Keys: Increase/decrease troop quantity (fast)
Mouse Wheel: Change troop quantity by scrolling over the selected region.
CTRL Key + Click: You can always use CTRL-click instead of the right mouse button.
Middle Click: To advance to next stage (Begin Turn, End Assaults, etc.) click the middle mouse button anywhere on the map.
2014-04-12 23:09:30 - stealth99: .....when i explained to you that i don't like ganging up on one player to end a game. It seems you won't let that go. After i gave you notice, and after i explained i wasn't going to participate in a gang-up on bpt,in round 28, i then ONLY attacked...
2014-04-12 23:11:01 - stealth99: .....bpt until round FORTY-FOUR. Exclusively bpt for all those rounds, with the exception of two singles of yours that i had to kill to get to bpt. During that time there were multiple opportunities where i could have tried to take you out or to gain...
2014-04-12 23:13:55 - stealth99: ....ground thru you....but i did not. Despte these clear facts, you say, "You hit me every time from the first attack util the last two".
2014-04-12 23:17:39 - stealth99: I don't get how your version of events can be so different from what actually occurred. Yes I absolutely did make a move to win the game in round 44. Unlike your claim of a "failed" attempt to take you out, it wasn't quite that basic of an attempt.....
2014-04-12 23:18:44 - stealth99: .....i intentionally only killed half of you over two rounds (half of the troops you had on top, necessary to kill you), hoping bpt would go for the other half. If that occurred i felt i could win the game. bpt is a good player and did not fall....
2014-04-12 23:20:44 - stealth99: .....into the trap, so I then did the only thing that was available to me; i backed off and started in on bpt again. When i did that you had recovered everything i took from you. You make it sound like i did something wrong dude and like i owe you....
2014-04-12 23:24:30 - stealth99: ....for attacking you for just two rounds in 16 rounds. Dude that's all i have to say on my attack on you but you made comments about your attack on me too that require clarification so here goes, briefly......
2014-04-12 23:28:27 - stealth99: At the time you attacked me, what you last viewed in the log was me hitting bpt for one full round. You were the smallest, i was 2nd and bpt was the biggest. You decide you want more ground (as you say, and not revenge), and have to pick one of us......
2014-04-12 23:29:51 - stealth99: .....so you pick the middle guy? When I am in a 3 player game and I am the smallest, I would expect that if i am not going to attack the big guy, that I am ending the game. Period! Even if I don't give the leader the game instantly,.....
2014-04-12 23:31:45 - stealth99: .....when the 2nd place guy fights back, and tries to defend his shit (as most people would and as i am MOST DEFINITELY going to do), then one would expect that this would end the game. So.......
2014-04-12 23:34:10 - stealth99: ....when you say you "were trying to even up the game", we know that this is bullshit, because no one would ever do that strategically in your position.
2014-04-12 23:35:14 - stealth99: I still don't get what possible reason you would ever expect that you could do that and be successful. I would never attack the leader, while the only other player who needs the leader attacked, is taking my shit. When i get it back, i'll attack.....
2014-04-12 23:36:53 - stealth99: .....the leader, not before. It's your call dude, as i said from the top, you got your shit back and then you took revenge with what i believe was an emotional attack. It certainly was NOT a strategic one.
2014-04-12 23:38:02 - stealth99: If I could sum up your position, you are now saying that "i'm going to take your stuff and you can't take it back from me because bpt is too strong and he will win". That is extortion and i suspect most guys would tell you to shove it.
2014-04-12 23:39:13 - stealth99: arkie, i listened to every word you spoke. There were a couple of points you made that were correct and I have not challenged those. I should not have flipped out, but i have called this one correctly.....
2014-04-12 23:40:50 - stealth99: ....whether you have done this for strategic reasons (very bad strategy though, suicide by ignorance if you thought this would help you win) or vindictive reasons; it matters not to me; the reply is the same in both instances and it's common sense.
2014-04-12 23:41:47 - stealth99: sorry for the length, i suck at being concise. I have spoken truthfully to you and when you use words like "counter attack", i'm not so sure you are intending to be completely honest with me.
2014-04-12 23:46:04 - stealth99: arkie one final comment - threating me by pointing out your stacks or your intentions, does not matter to me. My dilemma in this game was to not do you wrong, because of my friendship to bpt. I was trying to play honorably even though.....
2014-04-12 23:47:56 - stealth99: ....i'd be as happy if he won, as if i won. So your threats are meaningless, as you are threatening to give me what i wanted, but would not take out of respect for you. It bothers me that a bridge may be burning, but not bpt winning the game......
2014-04-12 23:50:42 - stealth99: ....as for the burning bridge, there isn't a damn thing i can do about it, when i am faced with vindictive attacks from the 3rd place guy, while i'm in second place.
2014-04-12 23:55:22 - stealth99: i did my best to fend off bpt's attack on my boat, San Cristobal. Without my deploy troops, and without my free move troops, both which are being used to recover my shit, the battle is lost and i suspect the game clinched. Fine by me.
2014-04-13 20:43:48 - ArkieDog: We can nit pick this thing to the end of game... And I didn't mind you trying to take me out, it was inevitable by you or Silver with me collecting the smallest bonus.
2014-04-13 20:45:10 - ArkieDog: What I took from your comments was an immature position that since your plan didnt
2014-04-13 20:47:04 - ArkieDog: work, either by you taking me in whole or taking half and letting Silver take the rest is only a matter of tactics (that failed... :) ), you stilled had plans on making it a two player game... And I'm still fine with that.
2014-04-13 20:48:28 - ArkieDog: I dont like players then complaining on how I retaliate, counter attack, or just plain ole revenge... You take a shot... You dont get to dictate how hard someone swings back.
2014-04-13 20:49:19 - ArkieDog: Thats part of fighing a logistical and/or emotional game...
2014-04-13 20:55:20 - ArkieDog: Let me ask you a question... After your plan of attacking half of me and Silver didn't take the bait, how long with my weakened state of bonuses compared to yours do you wait to come back and finish the deal?
2014-04-13 21:10:12 - ArkieDog: So if you don't like gangIng up on a player to win, yet you attack the weakest player to get your "shit back" (that's not revenge?), and you let Silver get stronger, how is that not "very bad strategy & suicicide by ignorance"?
2014-04-13 21:11:08 - ArkieDog: I will fight as long as I can by my own means to stay in this game, not suicide, that doesn't keep me in the game.
2014-04-13 21:12:50 - ArkieDog: However, all this said, I'm figting an uphill battle when you feel you need to get your shit back from me before keeping Silver from getting stronger.
2014-04-14 18:02:22 - stealth99: Arkie we are almost there. I agree with you that when I hit, i don't get to decide how hard you hit back. I like the line, have used it and agree with the concept. My complaint was not that you hit me back harder than i hit you.
2014-04-14 18:05:45 - stealth99: I also agree with you, that perhaps the simple fact of me speaking up at all, can be childish or not cool, if the topic is to be critical of someone elses play. That's on me too. However, diplomacy and player chat is a part of this game, so I choose....
2014-04-14 18:07:19 - stealth99: ....to communicate to other players any time they are making a strategic decision that damages me, while also inadvertently damaging themselves. There are two situations. One is when a player is ignorant. In those cases i just try to explain and hope....
2014-04-14 18:08:27 - stealth99: ....can objectively evaluate what i'm saying and adjust his play accordingly. Because of male ego (i am male too), my communication fails probably 80% of the time......
2014-04-14 18:09:42 - stealth99: .....the other situation is when i believe a player knows what he is doing, but is doing it because of an emotional reason. I usually am less polite in those instances. That's probably on me too. That was what occurred here. So it wasn't that you....
2014-04-14 18:10:28 - stealth99: ....didn't respond in equal intensity, it was that you responded so far that you are ending the game. Why the hell wouldn't I say that to someone?
2014-04-14 18:11:38 - stealth99: When you find yourself in third place here, your ONLY option to grow, is to hit the big guy and hope that when he retaliates, he does so at me more than you. That's it. If you choose to hit the 2nd place guy (which is what occurred here), you are.....
2014-04-14 18:12:20 - stealth99: .....then holding the game hostage and basically saying to the 2nd place guy, "give me your terts or we're suiciding". I can't see how you could interpret it any other way.
2014-04-14 18:13:29 - stealth99: So I agree with retaliation and I agree that you can retaliate as hard as you like, but I don't agree with a player holding the game hostage and I can't imagine any player who would give in to that situation. You just force my hand to be a coward and....
2014-04-14 18:14:56 - stealth99: ....let the smallest player in the game bully me, because he's willing to lose. When you came back at me beyond the point where I attacked you, because of the dynamics of our game, you did not have the option to "over retaliate" this time, without.....
2014-04-14 18:16:09 - stealth99: .....also taking on the role of "suicider". That is my only beef with you in this entire situation arkie, and I have backed off on and admitted to quite a bit along the way.
2014-04-14 18:17:26 - stealth99: When I hear the arguments that you have made, it is clear to me what you would do if you were in my position, and a smaller player was taking your terts and also expecting you to attack the leader just to keep the game alive.
2014-04-14 18:18:19 - stealth99: Treat both situations the same. If you'd have a problem with someone doing that to you, then don't argue that it's ok and not cool for me to speak up about it, especially when it's respectful conversation.
2014-04-16 11:53:31 - ArkieDog: FYI... Yes I busted your ships... After Silver left you stranded with 1's... realized the Crackins...
2014-04-16 11:54:13 - ArkieDog: To devour me or go get back you shit... :)
2014-04-16 11:55:44 - ArkieDog: From Silver, of course...
2014-04-21 15:30:42 - bpt777: gg Arkie
2014-04-21 23:17:30 - stealth99: nice win dude, crappy end, but i was really looking for an excuse to end this. I hate these stalemate games.
2014-04-21 23:38:40 - bpt777: i know bud, this one really did drag on far longer than needed didnt it!
2014-04-21 23:38:44 - bpt777: gg bud
