Moderator: Cartographers
P Gizzle wrote:yeah, i dunno, there's just sooooo many rich and wonderful things about NA and such great history
cowshrptrn wrote:P Gizzle wrote:yeah, i dunno, there's just sooooo many rich and wonderful things about NA and such great history
well, i think we're gettign a large amount of NA maps because most risk players are form north america.
As far as the civil war map, the state coundaries are the same as they are now, so unless you use different boundaries, and use one and two way barriers liberally it is doomed to be liek all the others.
as for the F and I war, i had no idea what you were talking about either (and i jsut took AP American History last year...) but i just realised it was the french and indian war, which i was an outgrowth of, i believe, the seven years war. (history teachers in the US are a bit ethnocentric)
ttocs wrote:isn't that weird how wars are called different names and countries blamde the other for starting the war. (ex. US history books say that Britain made the first shot, and Britain history books say that the americans shot first according to the revolutionary war sections in many of both books.)
P Gizzle wrote:well most historians believe the Brits shot first i think, either way it dont matter they both probably shot at the same time
Knight of Orient wrote:u gotta love history. i found out intwo months that all ive ever known about history has been a lie. l8r guys
ttocs wrote:P Gizzle wrote:well most historians believe the Brits shot first i think, either way it dont matter they both probably shot at the same time
But american historians are mainly the ones who study the revolutionary war
P Gizzle wrote:ttocs wrote:P Gizzle wrote:well most historians believe the Brits shot first i think, either way it dont matter they both probably shot at the same time
But american historians are mainly the ones who study the revolutionary war
does it even matter?!? point is both fired, we won!!!!
U-S-A!!!
cowshrptrn wrote:well if by "we" you mean the wealthy demi-aristocracy of america, then yes. If you mean the soldiers who acutally fought in the war, and were later forced out of their homes because they coulnd't repay loans, the no.
cowshrptrn wrote:P Gizzle wrote:ttocs wrote:P Gizzle wrote:well most historians believe the Brits shot first i think, either way it dont matter they both probably shot at the same time
But american historians are mainly the ones who study the revolutionary war
does it even matter?!? point is both fired, we won!!!!
U-S-A!!!
well if by "we" you mean the wealthy demi-aristocracy of america, then yes. If you mean the soldiers who acutally fought in the war, and were later forced out of their homes because they coulnd't repay loans, the no.
happysadfun wrote:cowshrptrn wrote:well if by "we" you mean the wealthy demi-aristocracy of america, then yes. If you mean the soldiers who acutally fought in the war, and were later forced out of their homes because they coulnd't repay loans, the no.
Hey! Watch your mouth there! At least I respect other countries!
I thought that you didn't live in America. *is confused*cowshrptrn wrote:happysadfun wrote:cowshrptrn wrote:well if by "we" you mean the wealthy demi-aristocracy of america, then yes. If you mean the soldiers who acutally fought in the war, and were later forced out of their homes because they coulnd't repay loans, the no.
Hey! Watch your mouth there! At least I respect other countries!
so do i, but i think thats a moot point in this case since i live in america.
Return to Melting Pot: Map Ideas
Users browsing this forum: No registered users