Moderator: Cartographers
The poll wrote:Large Geographic Maps (Classic, British Isles, Europe, etc.)
Small Geographic Maps (NYC, Berlin 1961, Cairns Coral Coast, etc.)
pepperonibread wrote:The poll wrote:Large Geographic Maps (Classic, British Isles, Europe, etc.)
Small Geographic Maps (NYC, Berlin 1961, Cairns Coral Coast, etc.)
Classic large? NYC small? I think you've got these two options reversed![]()
Also, any way you could edit the poll so it allows you to check multiple answers? That may get you better data...
Edit: Well, some have already voted, so I don't think you can change it now.
ZeakCytho wrote: If you want to write a few paragraphs about it, feel free to, but it's by no means necessary.
ZeakCytho wrote:pepperonibread wrote:The poll wrote:Large Geographic Maps (Classic, British Isles, Europe, etc.)
Small Geographic Maps (NYC, Berlin 1961, Cairns Coral Coast, etc.)
Classic large? NYC small? I think you've got these two options reversed![]()
Also, any way you could edit the poll so it allows you to check multiple answers? That may get you better data...
Edit: Well, some have already voted, so I don't think you can change it now.
The options were in terms of scale, not number of territories. The world vs. a city![]()
As for multiple answers, I guess that would have been a better idea![]()
But it's too late now.
pepperonibread wrote:ZeakCytho wrote:pepperonibread wrote:The poll wrote:Large Geographic Maps (Classic, British Isles, Europe, etc.)
Small Geographic Maps (NYC, Berlin 1961, Cairns Coral Coast, etc.)
Classic large? NYC small? I think you've got these two options reversed![]()
Also, any way you could edit the poll so it allows you to check multiple answers? That may get you better data...
Edit: Well, some have already voted, so I don't think you can change it now.
The options were in terms of scale, not number of territories. The world vs. a city![]()
As for multiple answers, I guess that would have been a better idea![]()
But it's too late now.
The world vs. a city? Then why is NYC paired with World 2.1? Maybe I'm just confused
But is not the size of the map and theme related to gameplay?seamusk wrote:I gotta say that its less about purely size and theme and more about good gameplay for me.
WidowMakers wrote:My favorite maps have always been those closer to Standard rules. I like some of the new XML features but not too many in one map. I prefer medium to large maps also.
WM
EDIT: Sorry seamusk, I must have initially read your post wrong. Basically you are saying that as long as it has good gameplay, you don't care what the size or them of the map is. For some reason I took that as the size and theme don't effect gameplay.. Sorry.
So I do agree with you. As long as it is fun to play, It should not matter the theme or size.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users