Conquer Club

[Unofficial] REVAMPS

Topics that are not maps. Discuss general map making concepts, techniques, contests, etc, here.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Postby yeti_c on Thu May 17, 2007 9:56 am

snufkin wrote:
poo-maker wrote:Not that anyone cares what i think... but europe is one of my fav maps too. I think that the graphics on it are perfect, and the game play is excellent.


oh.. a european who thinks the european map is perfect.. my bad then..

never mind - guess I went off-topic since what I really want is Europe 2.0 and that would not be a revamp.


Well europe 2.0 wouldn't be a bad thing at all... why don't you attempt it?

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
Lieutenant yeti_c
 
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am

Postby poo-maker on Thu May 17, 2007 10:04 am

snufkin wrote:
poo-maker wrote:Not that anyone cares what i think... but europe is one of my fav maps too. I think that the graphics on it are perfect, and the game play is excellent.


oh.. a european who thinks the european map is perfect.. my bad then..


Np. we all make mistakes. :wink:
Brigadier poo-maker
 
Posts: 1275
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:58 am
Location: Dublin, Ireland

Postby benjikat on Thu May 17, 2007 10:45 am

yeti_c wrote:
Guiscard wrote:As for Britain, it isn't a graphical thing for me but more of a territory thing... A lot of them are way off and I think it needs a whole overhaul gameplay wise rather than graphics wise, so not changing territories and borders would sort of defeat the objective.


I concur... hence my comment earlier... about however made it didn't live here!!!

The gameplay is good on it - just the locations are dubious...

C.



seconded (thirded??) - for a Brit some of the choices made for territory names are quite strange - not to mention the whole Hadrian's wall thing - fine if it's Roman Britain, but the names are all modern.

I think a GB map should be based on the county structure as can be found here: http://www.abcounties.co.uk/counties/list.htm, but that's more than a revamp
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class benjikat
 
Posts: 332
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:03 am

Postby Ruben Cassar on Thu May 17, 2007 10:56 am

Europe needs a lot of geographical accuracy fixes because it is a disaster in that aspect...
ImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Colonel Ruben Cassar
 
Posts: 2160
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:04 am
Location: Civitas Invicta, Melita, Evropa

Postby hulmey on Thu May 17, 2007 11:34 am

i agree with ue there ben...But if we re-vamp maps i think they should be left as close as possible to the orginal . Like keyogi has done to the middle east map
[img]http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/9761/41922610151374166770386.jpg[/mg]
User avatar
Lieutenant hulmey
 
Posts: 3742
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:33 am
Location: Las Vegas

Postby Ruben Cassar on Thu May 17, 2007 1:43 pm

hulmey wrote:i agree with ue there ben...But if we re-vamp maps i think they should be left as close as possible to the orginal . Like keyogi has done to the middle east map


If you don't fix the geographical accuracy in the Europe map you don't need to revamp it. It's better to create a new Europe map in that case...something that I would like to see actually...a map dedicated to Europe not Europe + North Africa + Middle East...
ImageImageImageImageImage
User avatar
Colonel Ruben Cassar
 
Posts: 2160
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:04 am
Location: Civitas Invicta, Melita, Evropa

Re: I agree and if no one minds...

Postby Keredrex on Thu May 17, 2007 2:44 pm

Coleman wrote:
WidowMakers wrote:
Keredrex wrote:as for Circus Maximus ... I definitely want to revamp that one.
So do I!

I want you to revamp canada though, I think you could make it look really great.


OK Ill do Canada but is it ok with the Original Cartographer as Well As whomever else I need the ok From
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Keredrex
 
Posts: 400
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 1:41 am
Location: New York

Postby gimil on Thu May 17, 2007 2:52 pm

as for the british isles should hadrians wall stay or go?

if i get the go ahead id like to take it out
Last edited by gimil on Thu May 17, 2007 3:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class gimil
 
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Postby yeti_c on Thu May 17, 2007 3:10 pm

gimil wrote:as for the british isles shout hadrians wall stay or go?

if i get the go ahead id like to take it out


I like Hadrians wall... I think that's a good gameplay point...

However the names of the territories are gash.

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
Lieutenant yeti_c
 
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am

Postby gimil on Thu May 17, 2007 3:24 pm

there nothnig wrong with the names just there geographic correctness.

i think the wall cuts up game play jsut a little too much
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class gimil
 
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Postby hulmey on Thu May 17, 2007 4:41 pm

British Isles is one of most loved and lpayed map...Why should it be changed in the slighest????

Please lets respect the original map makers as much as possible.

Britsh Isles is unique with the hadrians wall, i would hate to see it go....

If you want soemthing different create your own map of the british isles!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[img]http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/9761/41922610151374166770386.jpg[/mg]
User avatar
Lieutenant hulmey
 
Posts: 3742
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:33 am
Location: Las Vegas

Postby gimil on Thu May 17, 2007 4:46 pm

lol
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class gimil
 
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Postby WidowMakers on Thu May 17, 2007 4:52 pm

hulmey wrote:British Isles is one of most loved and lpayed map...Why should it be changed in the slighest????

Please lets respect the original map makers as much as possible.

Britsh Isles is unique with the hadrians wall, i would hate to see it go....

If you want soemthing different create your own map of the british isles!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I totally agree. The current purpose of the revamp (I believe) is to increase the quality of the graphics for some of the less than good looking maps. If the someone wants to change the layout of territories, names and borders, they should make another map and just let the revampers work on the graphics only issues.
Image
Major WidowMakers
 
Posts: 2774
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:25 am
Location: Detroit, MI

Postby gimil on Thu May 17, 2007 5:10 pm

right guys chill it was jsut a suggestion since the layout of teh map is looking to be changed anyway so that its more geographically correct
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class gimil
 
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Postby KEYOGI on Thu May 17, 2007 5:22 pm

WidowMakers and hulmey have pretty much hit it on the head. I see revamps as a way to bring old maps up to current foundry standards and if it ain't broke don't fix it.

Europe is a decent looking map that in my opinion plays pretty well. I think it looks nice enough, but there are a few small issues. Dark army shadows being one, and also the borders in Mediterranea and the sea connection between Albania and Italy. It could also use some new mountains.

Perhaps Europe doesn't need a complete revamp, just some touching up. The XML coordinates could use some work as well.
Sergeant 1st Class KEYOGI
 
Posts: 1632
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:09 am

Postby casper on Thu May 17, 2007 8:55 pm

I was thinking about redoing the mountains on the Hong Kong map. I never really was totally happy with them and probably could have spent a little more time on them. Good idea?

I would also be open to any suggestions for improving game play. If you have any game play issues with Hong Kong map please post in this ancient thread. Or I can start a new thread if need be.

As far as other revamps go...the XML on a lot of the early maps could be tweaked. A lot of the numbers are off center. And Indochina could use a lot of help graphically and maybe some barriers like rivers and mountains.
User avatar
Major casper
 
Posts: 416
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:36 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: I agree and if no one minds...

Postby casper on Thu May 17, 2007 8:57 pm

Keredrex wrote:
Coleman wrote:
WidowMakers wrote:
Keredrex wrote:as for Circus Maximus ... I definitely want to revamp that one.
So do I!

I want you to revamp canada though, I think you could make it look really great.


OK Ill do Canada but is it ok with the Original Cartographer as Well As whomever else I need the ok From


I think Canada is fine the way it is. I always liked the look of that map.
User avatar
Major casper
 
Posts: 416
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:36 pm
Location: Chicago

Postby sully800 on Thu May 17, 2007 10:22 pm

How about someone fixes the classic map before we go into all of this crazy amount of work on revamps? All the classic map needs is a connection between Scandanavia and Great Britain, since its in the XML but not on the map.

It could easily be done in about 5 seconds by a cartographer who has some power in the foundry (cough keyogi). And it would take lack another 5 seconds to load the new image as he did with world 2.1

We've known about the problem with the classic map for ages, and it is by far the most played map there is. I really think this problem deserves to be fixed, and its the easiest revamp of all.
User avatar
Major sully800
 
Posts: 4978
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 pm
Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

Postby casper on Thu May 17, 2007 10:29 pm

Good point sully. A very simple fix really. I recall early on in CC there wasn't a link from Greenland to Ontario either and Lack sorted that one out right away...

Also Kamchatka and Mongolia should border each other like they do on a real Risk board.
User avatar
Major casper
 
Posts: 416
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:36 pm
Location: Chicago

Postby KEYOGI on Thu May 17, 2007 11:19 pm

There's quite a few problems with Classic. The army shadows are useless, as they're too dark to show up blue properly and they cover the territory names in a lot of places. I'd also like to see a bit more contrast in the colours of Asia and Oceania.
Sergeant 1st Class KEYOGI
 
Posts: 1632
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:09 am

Postby yeti_c on Fri May 18, 2007 2:54 am

KEYOGI wrote:WidowMakers and hulmey have pretty much hit it on the head. I see revamps as a way to bring old maps up to current foundry standards and if it ain't broke don't fix it.

Europe is a decent looking map that in my opinion plays pretty well. I think it looks nice enough, but there are a few small issues. Dark army shadows being one, and also the borders in Mediterranea and the sea connection between Albania and Italy. It could also use some new mountains.

Perhaps Europe doesn't need a complete revamp, just some touching up. The XML coordinates could use some work as well.


But that's the point... the British Isles map IS broke...

The territory names and places are in the wrong places.

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
Lieutenant yeti_c
 
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am

Postby hulmey on Fri May 18, 2007 4:06 am

Yes its not a actual true re-presntation of the UK and IRELAND, but then that is impossiable to do on this map because you would need to add alot more countries.

But then did the map maker want to create a true represation of the area?

Or did he limit the amount of countries so that the map wouldnt be too large?

Again, why dont you go and make a new Uk? I think there is space and desire for a new UK!
[img]http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/9761/41922610151374166770386.jpg[/mg]
User avatar
Lieutenant hulmey
 
Posts: 3742
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:33 am
Location: Las Vegas

Postby Wisse on Fri May 18, 2007 4:27 am

sully800 wrote:How about someone fixes the classic map before we go into all of this crazy amount of work on revamps? All the classic map needs is a connection between Scandanavia and Great Britain, since its in the XML but not on the map.

It could easily be done in about 5 seconds by a cartographer who has some power in the foundry (cough keyogi). And it would take lack another 5 seconds to load the new image as he did with world 2.1

We've known about the problem with the classic map for ages, and it is by far the most played map there is. I really think this problem deserves to be fixed, and its the easiest revamp of all.

it also need a change of army shades that you can see blue
Image Image
User avatar
Sergeant Wisse
 
Posts: 4448
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: The netherlands, gelderland, epe

Postby yeti_c on Fri May 18, 2007 4:35 am

hulmey wrote:Yes its not a actual true re-presntation of the UK and IRELAND, but then that is impossiable to do on this map because you would need to add alot more countries.

But then did the map maker want to create a true represation of the area?

Or did he limit the amount of countries so that the map wouldnt be too large?

Again, why dont you go and make a new Uk? I think there is space and desire for a new UK!


Would if I could - I'm rubbish at GFX... Coding is my game!!

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
Lieutenant yeti_c
 
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am

Postby socralynnek on Fri May 18, 2007 5:44 am

I like the German map gameplay wise, but a lot of names are geographically inaccurate.

E.g. Rheinland is somewhere completely different.
There are umlauts missing in many names, some names are with wrong location to each other.
Bremenhaven should be Bremerhaven and so on.

But as you don't want name changes, keyogi, this one might not fulfill the criterion in thsi thread..
Corporal 1st Class socralynnek
 
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 8:33 am
Location: Germany

PreviousNext

Return to Foundry Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users