Moderator: Cartographers
AndyDufresne wrote:It will be one of the first to test the more than standard countries. Obviously tests should be done before hand, before creating a great map, and then having it be unplayable.
--Andy
hotgun wrote:What on earth... why is this getting so much good feedback and helpful!... where were these people when me and cybertech were making the MN map... this is a state 2!, why is this getting better feedback than ours did... no one wanted ours so we didn't finish making it after all the work we did!
spiesr wrote:Save yourself a wasted lifetime and stop now...
Marvaddin wrote:Blocky! And still very bad designed continents.
DublinDoogey wrote:Much of Wisconsin used to be forests, so, at least in the northern half, you can just use forests as natural barriers between continents/countries.
DublinDoogey wrote:Here's a possibe idea/solution to the general blockiness created by using modern day counties.
What if you used the (former) areas of different Indian tribes as the continents, and then used historic and/or modern sites, towns, parks, etc, named using Indian words or after Indians and/or tribes? (if that makes any sense)
Here's a picture to get you started:
Much of Wisconsin used to be forests, so, at least in the northern half, you can just use forests as natural barriers between continents/countries.
I think this map is abandoned.CheWolfe wrote:sorry man, forget putting in the river. just forget putting in anything, almost every map of an american state looks extremely boring.
Return to Melting Pot: Map Ideas
Users browsing this forum: No registered users