In please!!

gracias por la invitación!

Although somehow a natural step, searched in the forum and didn't find something like this.

Concise description:

⋅  The "invite" feature allows the invitation of more than one player per slot.

Specifics/Details:

⋅  Today "invite" feature allows the invitation of a ...

your post sounds a little bit arrogant to me, I really dont know if you are the best player ever (maybe you are). But I do know I want to win games and learn from experienced players, so consider me if you want!

thanks for the quick response!

that officially confirm my bad luck then! :S

Hi guys, did a quick search in the search box up there ^ , but couldnt find an answer for this:

I found out that most of the time I am playing with another opponent 1 vs 1, and I go (unfortunately for me) in second place.

Most of the time I don't create the games but join existing ones.

I want ...

I am in, Thanks for inviting.

Hi guys, Here some more fun

[game]5688471[/game]
[game]5688472[/game]
[game]5688554[/game]

Owen and me too!

Wonderful Idea BG and HA...

if you guys are looking for a tough fight ... take a look here:

[game]5648293[/game]
[game]5648297[/game]
[game]5648302[/game]

i dont find that people use the speicific ratings for the speicif category (fairplay ect)

someone who i accused of bring a multi whne i think he was, left me a 1* rating in everything, even attendance when it was a casual game and i took my turns virtually 30seconds after him!
so that needs to be ...

couldnt people just go see the game log and see that theyve recieved 3 armies for 7 terittories ?

sometimes with my team we share information when we see other playing, for example where the guys have deployed or if they are preparing threats. I almost sure other teams do the same stuff, if not ...

Concise description:

⋅ remove the "Playing" icon in FOW games when someone plays

Specifics:

⋅  When someone is looking at the game list, one can realize when other are playing, in FOW from my perspective this is undesirable., this enhancement will make more difficult to ...

After reading all the opinions, and then coming back to the original idea, I conclude that perhaps a good way to solve the issues is to and and MORE INFO field when someone create a game. In that sense the author can include informal rules such as "no chat" or "no truces", "no revealing information ...

NIce Job!

Personally I am against any intention of truce. From my point of view this affect in a negative sense the flow of the game, typically against the person who (most of the time) legitimately have reached the lead of the game in terms of strategical position or advantage in the general sense.

Entering ...

What is the CC setup that MINIMIZES luck and MAXIMIZES required strategy?

Also I will say, the number of players is a big factor.

Some games with "Good" configurations are more based on luck if they only have two players. Although, I don't know if there is an optimal number of players which ...

I prefer games with no cards, as that is obviously a big luck factor


although no cards add more weight to strategy, from my view, it has some other implications over the decisions of the players.

I've seen no card games where people tend to just stack their armies, cause there is no a real ...

lord voldemort wrote:or u just know where he deploys by looking at the game

If you use that logic why have a game log at all?

I still can retrieve useful information even if the number of countries deployed don't appear

Blitzaholic wrote:how can they back track on what others have accomplished months ago, or years for that matter?

From now to the future is probably the easier way, Almost sure that retrieving the ranking from the past is a titanic effort

Subject: Suggestion: Best ranking ever for each player

Concise description:
Show a player's highest attained rank on their profile. This would be displayed below their current rank.

Specifics/Details:
Due to the nature of the game a player can get promoted to a higher rank only to be ...