WL_southerner wrote:looks good how many players do you think would be the right number for this map i like it really good map and lay out
southy, i thought the title would have been sef-explanatory. ie 3 players for the 3 kingdoms
but 4 is much more likely.
The Three kingdoms does not mean the number of players, but the era in China's history not long after the fall of the Han Dynasty, and the land falling into chaos, with several regional lords all after the rule of china, some fought for glory, some fought for honor, and other just fought for the sake of fighting.
prime i think were beond this point in development[/quote]
i know, i was just saying, plus you have given me an idea, and i think i will make a map for when the han gained control of china in around 450 bc after the Qin Lost control, also known as the 'Warring States' period. so we have a before and an after.
I thought the bonus for the whole kingdom was just the bonus of the various parts added together +2 and would override the pieces by themselves in a World 2.1 fashion.
WL_southerner wrote:looks good how many players do you think would be the right number for this map i like it really good map and lay out
southy, i thought the title would have been sef-explanatory. ie 3 players for the 3 kingdoms
but 4 is much more likely.
The Three kingdoms does not mean the number of players, but the era in China's history not long after the fall of the Han Dynasty, and the land falling into chaos, with several regional lords all after the rule of china, some fought for glory, some fought for honor, and other just fought for the sake of fighting.
uhm, yeah i know.
1. if u read the first page, u would have known that.
2. if u actually read my post more carefully, u would have seen that it was a joke
3. do u not understand the concept of a laughing smilie?
i thought the same as u coleman, but its best if we get the "yes" from gimil as well.
Time to retire this much loved sig of mine with a new clan.
WL_southerner wrote:looks good how many players do you think would be the right number for this map i like it really good map and lay out
southy, i thought the title would have been sef-explanatory. ie 3 players for the 3 kingdoms
but 4 is much more likely.
The Three kingdoms does not mean the number of players, but the era in China's history not long after the fall of the Han Dynasty, and the land falling into chaos, with several regional lords all after the rule of china, some fought for glory, some fought for honor, and other just fought for the sake of fighting.
uhm, yeah i know.
1. if u read the first page, u would have known that.
2. if u actually read my post more carefully, u would have seen that it was a joke
3. do u not understand the concept of a laughing smilie?
i thought the same as u coleman, but its best if we get the "yes" from gimil as well.
WL_southerner wrote:looks good how many players do you think would be the right number for this map i like it really good map and lay out
southy, i thought the title would have been sef-explanatory. ie 3 players for the 3 kingdoms
but 4 is much more likely.
The Three kingdoms does not mean the number of players, but the era in China's history not long after the fall of the Han Dynasty, and the land falling into chaos, with several regional lords all after the rule of china, some fought for glory, some fought for honor, and other just fought for the sake of fighting.
uhm, yeah i know.
1. if u read the first page, u would have known that.
2. if u actually read my post more carefully, u would have seen that it was a joke
3. do u not understand the concept of a laughing smilie?
i thought the same as u coleman, but its best if we get the "yes" from gimil as well.
i just wanted to show of.
we all succumb to our desires, just picked the wrong guy as an example to show off.
no problem. just check next time
Time to retire this much loved sig of mine with a new clan.
as promised
liang liang continent is properly called xi liang.
you you continent is bei ping
central wei
the one above xu is called ben hai
ye is xia pi
chang an is where si is
xu chang is where yu is
he fei is where u have xu
wei jing is jei ting
central wei should be worth 7 as it was historically very hard t take over and cao cao just mde it look easy.
north yi
the name for north yi is riverlands.
chang yang is yong an
tian shui is where pha si is i think.
south yi pai yai and chiao is northeast of where the nanman kingdom was, when shu took it over they joined so make that a separate continant under shu maybe worth 2. then split yue sui up, this new continent shopuld be worth 4. yong an can be the north part and keep the name for the south part.
yang nan hai is han hai
jing
jin yang is where bing is
hang sha is chang sha
ling ling is jiang ling
Last edited by sam_levi_11 on Sat Oct 13, 2007 6:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Also, somewhere in the South (Not sure where though), there is also supposed to be the Nanman territory. From what I understand, it was a fairly important region to Wu and Shu.
muy_thaiguy wrote:Also, somewhere in the South (Not sure where though), there is also supposed to be the Nanman territory. From what I understand, it was a fairly important region to Wu and Shu.
look at my big post and in the section marked south yi
i know, i have seen both trailers. new duel system seems much better with soldiers making a ring and there being no special arena...if ur losing fight ur way out of ring....also soldiers rush to help near gone officers some times
