Moderator: Community Team
karelpietertje wrote:I'll go with that, herkie.
aage wrote:His name is Dutch and it's a combination of two actual names... It's like "John-William" in English
ga7 wrote:Haggis specifically told Strike was his third investigation.
As in, i already mentioned two people i profiled, and the last one(that i didn't mention) is strike ...HaggisMcMutton wrote: Correct. The third one i profiled(and didn't mention cause it's useless now) is strike.
Nope, just you having tunnel vision. You don't have one damn good argument against me, just a bunch of weak ones, and somehow that makes me scummier than the guy we CAUGHT BLATANTLY LYING ...ga7 wrote: That's a pwn no?
Close enough.aage wrote:His name is Dutch and it's a combination of two actual names... It's like "John-William" in English

Why did you pick this name, out of curiosity?karelpietertje wrote:Close enough.aage wrote:His name is Dutch and it's a combination of two actual names... It's like "John-William" in English
the adding of -tje to the end means that it's 'little john-william' though.
-I had a really cool kid in class who had a double name with 'kp' as abbreviationtheherkman wrote:Why did you pick this name, out of curiosity?karelpietertje wrote:Close enough.aage wrote:His name is Dutch and it's a combination of two actual names... It's like "John-William" in English
the adding of -tje to the end means that it's 'little john-william' though.

I only get told if the profile "matches" or not. So basically innocent/guilty.theherkman wrote: Also, Haggis, what information do you get specifically? Innocent/guilty? Cop/mafia doctor/3rd party lyncher? How much detail do you get?
What is this "crucial extra day"?karelpietertje wrote: How do others (especially the Jace voters), feel about choosing to lynch haggis, which could give us a crucial extra day if he is indeed the godfather?
I explained why i did that. If you don't buy it please explain why.theherkman wrote:Especially when he knew Jace was at the beginning of the day and didn't move for a lynch of him...
I've already told you my backstory. I told you that my backstory says I'm hunting a mafia leader and so on.theherkman wrote: FP by Haggis - I read the mafiascum.net FBI character page. It says you have only one target and when you investigate it either matches that one target or not. Is this the case with you? If so, who is your target? What is your backstory, who are you after, and why?
Haggis_McMutton wrote:I explained why i did that. If you don't buy it please explain why.theherkman wrote:Especially when he knew Jace was at the beginning of the day and didn't move for a lynch of him...
I've already told you my backstory. I told you that my backstory says I'm hunting a mafia leader and so on.theherkman wrote: FP by Haggis - I read the mafiascum.net FBI character page. It says you have only one target and when you investigate it either matches that one target or not. Is this the case with you? If so, who is your target? What is your backstory, who are you after, and why?
However i don't know the exact mechanics of my role. Maybe I'm just a cop with a flavour, maybe I can only detect as guilty those in the mafia whose leader I'm hunting.(assuming there are more mafia's/ SK's whatever)
I'm still waiting an explanation for this sense of urgency that you people have. Town hasn't done too bad so far,there's still 18 fucking people in this game, and now we've got the 4th scum caught lying. Why exactly are you all acting like we're at LYLO? Why are you willing to risk lynching a town power role for the vague benefit of "saving time" or an "extra day"(what extra day? that doesn't even make sense).
Umm, where are you getting this? I postyed very valid reasons for why you shouldn't just reveal yourself as cop immediately, and ga7 and thez, who have been pushing for my lynch, haven't refuted those reasons. So I'm going to guess they stand.theherkman wrote: Okay, firstly, I don't buy it because you are a better player than that. You KNOW that if you have the name of a scum you say so during the day so he/she can be lynched. You didn't = scummy.
Nope, I don't know the exact mechanics, in a game with complex roles it can be like that, adds to the fun imo. What i know is that if i got someone as guilty then they are guilty. And Jace is guilty.theherkman wrote: Secondly, you don't know the mechanics of your role? Come on. Give me a break! The FBI page at mafiascum says that the FBI agent can only deteck the role of SK and all others come back as innocent. Now you are telling me that you don't know who qualifies as guilty or innocent? This is yet another reason to think you are scum.
No, we have 18 players left and we had 2 kills last night, we are nowhere near lylo.theherkman wrote: Thirdly, we want to lynch you because we have about 15 players left. Some nights we have had no town kills. Last night I think we had 4 kills. Who knows how many kills we will have tonight?!?! We don't want to risk you being the godfather. You certainly aren't helping your case.
What the f*ck do you want me to say, if i say it any more clearly I'll be quoting the PM...theherkman wrote: How is your role explained? What does your PM say about your results? EXPLAIN CLEARLY. You have not gained any points with me. Even if you are not voted today I will seriously consider having you NK'd unless some shit straightens out.
Haggis wrote:
Basically I'm an FBI agent/profiler, and I'm hunting down the head of the mafia. Each night I can verify somebodies psychological profile and see if it matches with any of our criminal profiles.
The gun belongs to my personal enemy, the guy I've been hunting for 13 years, the head of the mafia. I had some weird backstory about how I recently got very close to catching him in a snare, he managed to escape but left his gun, which I took as a trophy of sorts. This is why i was worried this might happen when you claimed gunsmith.
Mr.S you're one cunning bastard, I've got to say
So far i know that ga7 isn't in the mafia I'm hunting and Jace IS.
Haggis wrote: I "profile" people. The profiles either match "criminal profiles" or they don't. Yours didn't, Jace's did.
Haggis wrote: Come on ga7, really? You see no reason why i would not say "hey Jace is guilty" off the bat?
I'll give you two:
1. I wanted to see if Commander had gotten another guilty result. He's already a claimed investigator, if he had already gotten another scum, there would be no point in me revealing myself as that would only increase the scums chances of killing an investigative role in the night.
2. Even if Commander didn't catch anyone else, aren't you supposed to try to get a lynch on the person without revealing first? After seeing if Commander had caught anything, and assuming he didn't, I would have made a case against Jace and tried to put pressure on him without actually claiming. Assuming he played as badly as he did today we might have just got him without me being revealed. Only if this second course of action would have failed as well, then i would have claimed.
Haggis wrote: I investigated ga7 night 1, strike night 2 and Jace night 3.
Haggis wrote: Seriously, this isn't rocket science:
1. Kill me, if I'm lying you get scum, if I'm telling the truth you lose a town power role
2. Kill Jace, if I'm lying you get scum(me), if I'm telling the truth you get scum(jace).
None of your goddamned business. [sarcasm]Do you not have night actions?[/sarcasm] Please don't ruin the spirit of the thread by wanting every action written out. Otherwise we should just fucking mass claim, and that would be boring.theherkman wrote:Okay, tailgunner, why did you visit flores on N2? Explain yourself please.
Besides, what do you care? Don't you suspect flores? Why defend her? Or are you just nosy?herk wrote:I was going to see about Haggis or Flores last night, but I am seriously considering them for tonight.
He's explained like 5-6 times. RTFT. You skim like nobody else.herk wrote:Also, Haggis, what information do you get specifically? Innocent/guilty? Cop/mafia doctor/3rd party lyncher? How much detail do you get?
QFT.Haggis_McMuffin wrote:in a game with complex roles it can be like that, adds to the fun imo.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
CC mafia is in no way similar to Mafiascum. I would suggest you do not look there in the future for clarification on a role.theherkman wrote: I read the mafiascum.net FBI character page.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Why has my question made you so defensive?TA1LGUNN3R wrote:None of your goddamned business.theherkman wrote:Okay, tailgunner, why did you visit flores on N2? Explain yourself please.
Besides, what do you care? Don't you suspect flores? Why defend her? Or are you just nosy?herk wrote:I was going to see about Haggis or Flores last night, but I am seriously considering them for tonight.
Don't question my motives or my actions unless you have reason to cast suspicion on me. I have done nothing suspicious. Also, I can guarantee you everyone single person has visited another person through night actions. It's the nature of a non-vanilla game. (excluding prudent town vigs of course)
Thank you for the clarification. Given this comment, I now lend a small bit more credence to Haggis's story...Mr. Squirrel wrote:CC mafia is in no way similar to Mafiascum. I would suggest you do not look there in the future for clarification on a role.theherkman wrote: I read the mafiascum.net FBI character page.