Moderator: Community Team
anonymus wrote:because honestly i think a lot of the problems would vanish if there where some thinking beings on the other side of the monitor..
/

stahrgazer wrote:Meanwhile, remember: the 'suicide' wouldn't be suicide if the dice favored that player. Sometimes a legitimate gamble fails, resulting in death, kind of like the jumpers whose parachutes didn't open after all. Should they take the jump or cower in the cockpit? They, not you, decide.

Georgerx7di wrote:Don't know if anyone has mentioned this to you (RE: original post), but the solution is not to play with cooks, cadets and privates. They aren't going to stop doing it, if they did then they wouldn't be cooks, cadets and privates. So either accept it and figure their poor play will compensate, or don't play them.
tkr4lf wrote:Georgerx7di wrote:Don't know if anyone has mentioned this to you (RE: original post), but the solution is not to play with cooks, cadets and privates. They aren't going to stop doing it, if they did then they wouldn't be cooks, cadets and privates. So either accept it and figure their poor play will compensate, or don't play them.
Eh, not quite true. Newer players to the site are cooks, cadets, or privates because they are new to the site. Not necessarily because they suicide all the time. I'm still a private, and I have yet to suicide on anybody. (I know it says I joined in '08, which I did, but I never came back because I was looking for somewhere to play Risk online, that is, a faster paced game. I recently, like in the last month or two, came back and gave it another go. I'm quite liking it now.) So, you can't say don't play with any of them. How will they ever learn if they don't get to play against and see how the higher ranks play and win the games?
