Moderator: Community Team
That's because He created us with free will. If we weren't allowed to choose, then He would have just been creating robots, not humans. God has free will, so He created us with free will.Army of GOD wrote:1. God creates universe
2. God creates perfect being in his image
3. Perfect being manages to sin, thus proving to be imperfect
Am I the only one who isn't following this logic?
And you would do well to not judge the actions of a people in 422 A.D. by the standards of 2012 A.D. It was a completely different world, and you also seem to generalize that every action by all Christians throughout history were unjust and unprovoked. You need the context to understand that not every event in history was to be blamed on one side. Some of the times the actions can be caused by an initial action from another people, such as invasion. Sometimes they were wrong, sometimes they were right, sometimes they did things that better humanity, sometimes they did not.chang50 wrote:Your point would have more force if Christians had behaved a little bit more like they were supposed to over the last 2000 years.patches70 wrote:Or we could have just adopted the Roman way. Death before dishonor, Roman civilization is the greatest and all the rest mere barbarians. What of those "pre-existing" myths that people would have latched onto instead?chang50 wrote:Far more likely it would have made little difference as people would have made up something else to follow,or latched onto a pre-existing myth..john9blue wrote:more likely, we would have either killed ourselves off already, or come so close to doing so that technology and education would be set back even furtherarmy of nobunaga wrote:Without Jesus we would probably have a colony on the moon and MArs today.
Without Christianity human beings and society would be even more fractured and sectarian. Before Jesus the prevailing thought of individuals was that of loyalty to the tribe and at best distrust of others. Certainly far less tolerance of other cultures and societies. Not saying the early Christian Church was very thoughtful or understanding of that concept either but it was Jesus who planted the seed that changed the world. Without him, this world would be even worse off.
Forget not that it was the Romans who burnt the Great Library of Alexandria down (right around the time Jesus was born). Scholars agree that had it not been burnt we human beings could well have been landing on the moon instead of just discovering the new world in Columbus' day. So was the thinking and arrogance of the Roman Empire that no matter how inventive another culture may be, if it wasn't Roman it was worthless.
The Romans were inventive and clever, true enough. But their thoughts on compassion and tolerance would be quite abhorrent to us today. Jesus' message to treat each other with love and kindness, even to our enemies, seems easy enough to accept to us today. But to the people of the time, it was a novel and alien concept. The world would be greatly different had not that idea been offered and only by the very limited acceptance today of that very concept is the world even remotely better than it was back in those days. In so far as how we treat each other (which is still like crap but miles above how we once were).
There are still a great many people in the world who are as selfish, cruel and self absorbed with themselves as the Romans were. Token platitudes from mouth, black evil in heart. Atheistic Utopian promises while pissing on the very seed of compassion planted by Jesus. Those promises won't amount to much so long as they keep trying to kill the sprout of kindness.
How is original sin my own choice?Night Strike wrote:Humans are only worthless because we have chosen to sin. God created us as perfect beings and desires a personal relationship with us. He's not demanding that we be groveling servants because that's not what he has in store for us in eternity.
I'll assuage you to death with Saxi sausage if you disagree or agree.Army of GOD wrote:ITT: we make unfounded claims that the world would be worse/better off without Christianity.
Having a German grandma and a Polish grandpa, I ingest brauts like air.BigBallinStalin wrote:I'll assuage you to death with Saxi sausage if you disagree or agree.Army of GOD wrote:ITT: we make unfounded claims that the world would be worse/better off without Christianity.
Haggis_McMutton wrote:1.
Where are you getting this individualism from? The entire central point of western religions is that humans are worthless pieces of shit who need to constantly grovel before a higher power, or suffer for eternity.
The whole concept, that you're tainted from birth, condemned to death as it were, and no action you take can ever save you, except for admitting your worthlessness and begging god to forgive your imagined crimes. This is the most extreme form of dictatorship imaginable.
What are the powers of the state or the priest compared to this? Any form of human dictatorship is vastly preferable as at least your suffering is limited by death. Not so with god though, he is there forever. Grovel or burn. Greatest love story indeed.
Of course.Army of GOD wrote:Patches, you're excluding a lot of pre-Christian religions, including, but not limited to:
1. Hinduism
2. Buddhism
3. Shintoism
4. Indigenous beliefs and religions throughout the world
Yeah I gotta agree if Jesus existed he was a pretty cool dude. Despite some of the crazy stuff attributed to him, the general message associated with him is a good one and worth sharing.patches70 wrote:Haggis_McMutton wrote:1.
Where are you getting this individualism from? The entire central point of western religions is that humans are worthless pieces of shit who need to constantly grovel before a higher power, or suffer for eternity.
The whole concept, that you're tainted from birth, condemned to death as it were, and no action you take can ever save you, except for admitting your worthlessness and begging god to forgive your imagined crimes. This is the most extreme form of dictatorship imaginable.
What are the powers of the state or the priest compared to this? Any form of human dictatorship is vastly preferable as at least your suffering is limited by death. Not so with god though, he is there forever. Grovel or burn. Greatest love story indeed.
Your understanding is lacking.
Remember back to the days before Jesus. There, the individual could not, was not allowed to commune with God. Whatever God that individual may have worshiped. From Zeus, to Jupiter, to Isis, to Mithra or whatever you wish to look at.
The Pharaohs along with their priests interpreted the word of God. The average Egyptian wasn't even allowed to learn to read hieroglyphs let alone have a relationship with their God.
The Greeks had to defer to an oracle.
The Jews were not allowed to set foot into the holiest of holy's, only the high priest could do that.
The Pope's of old told the flock what God wanted, read from Bibles written in Latin where the flock had no ability or knowledge to even read. It was punishable by death to write the Holy book into any other language that the masses could read themselves.
The Romans replaced God with The State.
The Pharisees strode around the cities telling who was and who was not righteous. Interpreting ill fate as punishment from God and demanding sacrifice to make amends while not even understanding the true wisdom of their own holy books.
Religious leaders of then and even now issue orders, Fatwas, edicts and expect the believers to obey without question as if individuals had no intellect of their own.
Jesus changed all that. But those in religious power were not easily swayed to relinquish that power.
Jesus taught that each individual, sinner or saint, righteous or not, could have a personal relationship with God. Jesus taught that that even the lowest of those in life were like Kings to God and the Kings were like the lowliest of servants before the Creator.
Jesus taught that it was the spirit of Mosaic law that mattered, not a strict, rigid adherence to the letter with no thought of circumstance and just plain bad fate. Would you not pull your <ass> (donkey) from the pit even if it were the Sabbath?
Jesus taught a new way to look at life, a new way that at the time was truly mind shattering. To treat people, even if they were not of your tribe, of your land, gentile or Jew, treat them all as you would have yourself treated.
Jesus did not come to topple Kings and Empires. He came to free our minds.
We today cannot appreciate that message for the truly awe inspiring difference of thought that the people of those times had. The very idea of a "Good Samaritan" or the story of Jesus and the Roman Centurion would have been beyond troubling to the people of the day. The message that even the hated Roman could have a relationship with the very God that the Jews worshiped, that the same promise God made to the chosen people was extended to all of the Earth if they but understood the wisdom. Because the Pharisees of the time did not understand that truth, that wisdom that promise was extended to all the peoples of the Earth.
It is not irrational to want to work out differences between people, societies, cultures, individuals without bloodshed and violence.
It is not irrational to treat people fairly, honestly and justly.
It is not irrational to see people not like yourself and understand that they are in many ways the same as you.
It is not irrational to love, to show kindness.
Where do you think these things came from?
Who do you think taught this message at a time and place in history where it could actually spread across the globe?
Even the vast majority of the great thinkers of the Renaissance era were deeply religious and yet they had the courage to pursue their God given gifts of intellect and art despite possible punishment from the religious leaders of the day. Where do you think the basis of their courage came from?
That despite what the Pope may say, or the Iman, or the Rabbi, or the preacher may say, those individuals understood that we were all men looked at the same by God as Jesus taught. That even if they were to have their lives taken or their freedom stripped, that they would be vindicated by God and by history in the end.
Look at the most evil of men in history and see what they have in common. The complete lack of acknowledgment of the rights of the individual. That the State, in whatever form it may be, knows better what the people need than the individuals themselves. That those same human beings in power know better morality than the individual could know themselves.
Jesus taught us a better way to view ourselves. A view not at all widely held during his time and not widely held enough in our age.
It is the greatest love story ever told. And it changed the world in ways that those who are blind with prejudice or ill informed perception could never understand.

Any religion that actually cares about the people, would have no problem with anything Jesus taught. Even an Atheist, excluding the Love God message Jesus taught, would find nothing else wrong with his teachings.Baron Von PWN wrote: Yeah I gotta agree if Jesus existed he was a pretty cool dude. Despite some of the crazy stuff attributed to him, the general message associated with him is a good one and worth sharing.
I am interested in these sources. Care to share?patches70 wrote:Any religion that actually cares about the people, would have no problem with anything Jesus taught. Even an Atheist, excluding the Love God message Jesus taught, would find nothing else wrong with his teachings.Baron Von PWN wrote: Yeah I gotta agree if Jesus existed he was a pretty cool dude. Despite some of the crazy stuff attributed to him, the general message associated with him is a good one and worth sharing.
Jesus was a cool dude.
And Jesus did exist. There was a man named Jesus who traveled and taught and was documented by numerous Roman and Jewish sources. This same man was also crucified. Whether or not he was actually the Son of God is the only real thing that is left uncertain. But the man Jesus certainly did exist.
The biggest problem is that Jesus himself never wrote a single word that anyone knows of. But what he taught, what is attributed as his teachings, are good and wise lessons to hold onto through life. I would challenge anyone to name any message that Jesus taught that they would disagree with in that what he taught about how we are supposed to treat each other.
I think we're talking past each other to a certain extent. You seem to be making 2 points:patches70 wrote: Your understanding is lacking.
Remember back to the days before Jesus. There, the individual could not, was not allowed to commune with God. Whatever God that individual may have worshiped. From Zeus, to Jupiter, to Isis, to Mithra or whatever you wish to look at.
The Pharaohs along with their priests interpreted the word of God. The average Egyptian wasn't even allowed to learn to read hieroglyphs let alone have a relationship with their God.
The Greeks had to defer to an oracle.
The Jews were not allowed to set foot into the holiest of holy's, only the high priest could do that.
The Pope's of old told the flock what God wanted, read from Bibles written in Latin where the flock had no ability or knowledge to even read. It was punishable by death to write the Holy book into any other language that the masses could read themselves.
The Romans replaced God with The State.
The Pharisees strode around the cities telling who was and who was not righteous. Interpreting ill fate as punishment from God and demanding sacrifice to make amends while not even understanding the true wisdom of their own holy books.
Religious leaders of then and even now issue orders, Fatwas, edicts and expect the believers to obey without question as if individuals had no intellect of their own.
Jesus changed all that. But those in religious power were not easily swayed to relinquish that power.
Jesus taught that each individual, sinner or saint, righteous or not, could have a personal relationship with God. Jesus taught that that even the lowest of those in life were like Kings to God and the Kings were like the lowliest of servants before the Creator.
Jesus taught that it was the spirit of Mosaic law that mattered, not a strict, rigid adherence to the letter with no thought of circumstance and just plain bad fate. Would you not pull your <ass> (donkey) from the pit even if it were the Sabbath?
Jesus taught a new way to look at life, a new way that at the time was truly mind shattering. To treat people, even if they were not of your tribe, of your land, gentile or Jew, treat them all as you would have yourself treated.
Jesus did not come to topple Kings and Empires. He came to free our minds.
We today cannot appreciate that message for the truly awe inspiring difference of thought that the people of those times had. The very idea of a "Good Samaritan" or the story of Jesus and the Roman Centurion would have been beyond troubling to the people of the day. The message that even the hated Roman could have a relationship with the very God that the Jews worshiped, that the same promise God made to the chosen people was extended to all of the Earth if they but understood the wisdom. Because the Pharisees of the time did not understand that truth, that wisdom that promise was extended to all the peoples of the Earth.
It is not irrational to want to work out differences between people, societies, cultures, individuals without bloodshed and violence.
It is not irrational to treat people fairly, honestly and justly.
It is not irrational to see people not like yourself and understand that they are in many ways the same as you.
It is not irrational to love, to show kindness.
Where do you think these things came from?
Who do you think taught this message at a time and place in history where it could actually spread across the globe?
Even the vast majority of the great thinkers of the Renaissance era were deeply religious and yet they had the courage to pursue their God given gifts of intellect and art despite possible punishment from the religious leaders of the day. Where do you think the basis of their courage came from?
That despite what the Pope may say, or the Iman, or the Rabbi, or the preacher may say, those individuals understood that we were all men looked at the same by God as Jesus taught. That even if they were to have their lives taken or their freedom stripped, that they would be vindicated by God and by history in the end.
Look at the most evil of men in history and see what they have in common. The complete lack of acknowledgment of the rights of the individual. That the State, in whatever form it may be, knows better what the people need than the individuals themselves. That those same human beings in power know better morality than the individual could know themselves.
Jesus taught us a better way to view ourselves. A view not at all widely held during his time and not widely held enough in our age.
It is the greatest love story ever told. And it changed the world in ways that those who are blind with prejudice or ill informed perception could never understand.
Have you seen The Man from Earth by any chance?patches70 wrote:Of course.Army of GOD wrote:Patches, you're excluding a lot of pre-Christian religions, including, but not limited to:
1. Hinduism
2. Buddhism
3. Shintoism
4. Indigenous beliefs and religions throughout the world
The bible tells of when Jesus was born and his very early life as a child. Then he disappears and returns in his late 20's. People wonder where Jesus was in that time between.
Some believe that Jesus traveled as a boy and young man. That he experienced many cultures that were not widely known or understood and when he returned he brought all that knowledge with him and taught a new way to look at life.
look up "the historicity of jesus"Army of GOD wrote:I am interested in these sources. Care to share?patches70 wrote:
Any religion that actually cares about the people, would have no problem with anything Jesus taught. Even an Atheist, excluding the Love God message Jesus taught, would find nothing else wrong with his teachings.
Jesus was a cool dude.
And Jesus did exist. There was a man named Jesus who traveled and taught and was documented by numerous Roman and Jewish sources. This same man was also crucified. Whether or not he was actually the Son of God is the only real thing that is left uncertain. But the man Jesus certainly did exist.
The biggest problem is that Jesus himself never wrote a single word that anyone knows of. But what he taught, what is attributed as his teachings, are good and wise lessons to hold onto through life. I would challenge anyone to name any message that Jesus taught that they would disagree with in that what he taught about how we are supposed to treat each other.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Hell, you can wiki Jesus and they have links to sources you can look at. Or you can look up these sources if you wish.Army of GOD wrote:I am interested in these sources. Care to share?patches70 wrote:Any religion that actually cares about the people, would have no problem with anything Jesus taught. Even an Atheist, excluding the Love God message Jesus taught, would find nothing else wrong with his teachings.Baron Von PWN wrote: Yeah I gotta agree if Jesus existed he was a pretty cool dude. Despite some of the crazy stuff attributed to him, the general message associated with him is a good one and worth sharing.
Jesus was a cool dude.
And Jesus did exist. There was a man named Jesus who traveled and taught and was documented by numerous Roman and Jewish sources. This same man was also crucified. Whether or not he was actually the Son of God is the only real thing that is left uncertain. But the man Jesus certainly did exist.
The biggest problem is that Jesus himself never wrote a single word that anyone knows of. But what he taught, what is attributed as his teachings, are good and wise lessons to hold onto through life. I would challenge anyone to name any message that Jesus taught that they would disagree with in that what he taught about how we are supposed to treat each other.
It's on netflix but I haven't watched it. Should I watch it?Haggis_McMutton wrote:Have you seen The Man from Earth by any chance?patches70 wrote:Of course.Army of GOD wrote:Patches, you're excluding a lot of pre-Christian religions, including, but not limited to:
1. Hinduism
2. Buddhism
3. Shintoism
4. Indigenous beliefs and religions throughout the world
The bible tells of when Jesus was born and his very early life as a child. Then he disappears and returns in his late 20's. People wonder where Jesus was in that time between.
Some believe that Jesus traveled as a boy and young man. That he experienced many cultures that were not widely known or understood and when he returned he brought all that knowledge with him and taught a new way to look at life.
Don't really know you, so it's hard to say.patches70 wrote:It's on netflix but I haven't watched it. Should I watch it?Haggis_McMutton wrote: Have you seen The Man from Earth by any chance?
Oh that tired old canard again,'you hate Christianity',I suppose it was due an airing.Can you not recognise intellectual curiousity,bemusement,bafflement?I want to understand the longevity and enduring nature of particular myths such as Christianity as opposed to the vast majority that rise briefly and disappear.Are you so emotionally invested in your beliefs that you have to automatically ascribe ill motives to any outsider who sincerely questions those beliefs?I hope not because it makes adult discussion very difficult..patches70 wrote:And can you not see how you are projecting what Theocracies, States and the injustices individuals did in those times to blaming individuals of today who have never committed such atrocities?chang50 wrote: Your point would have more force if Christians had behaved a little bit more like they were supposed to over the last 2000 years.
Your obvious hatred of Christianity clouds you perception so that you assume Christians of today are like those of 2000 years ago.
You blame the mistakes of those in the past on those who live today.
It is very short sighted and bigoted if you think about it honestly....
Yeah, when you grow up a bit and understand what discussions are, as opposed to referring to them as "adult" discussions, do come back and have a talk. Plenty of people to argue with, agree with, or have a adult discussion with.chang50 wrote:Oh that tired old canard again,'you hate Christianity',I suppose it was due an airing.Can you not recognise intellectual curiousity,bemusement,bafflement?I want to understand the longevity and enduring nature of particular myths such as Christianity as opposed to the vast majority that rise briefly and disappear.Are you so emotionally invested in your beliefs that you have to automatically ascribe ill motives to any outsider who sincerely questions those beliefs?I hope not because it makes adult discussion very difficult..patches70 wrote:And can you not see how you are projecting what Theocracies, States and the injustices individuals did in those times to blaming individuals of today who have never committed such atrocities?chang50 wrote: Your point would have more force if Christians had behaved a little bit more like they were supposed to over the last 2000 years.
Your obvious hatred of Christianity clouds you perception so that you assume Christians of today are like those of 2000 years ago.
You blame the mistakes of those in the past on those who live today.
It is very short sighted and bigoted if you think about it honestly....
What a bizarre outburst,it's my firm opinion that to say someone hates Christianity as a kneejerk reaction to any honest scepticism/questioning is somewhat immature,and I suspect you would not like it either.Symmetry wrote:Yeah, when you grow up a bit and understand what discussions are, as opposed to referring to them as "adult" discussions, do come back and have a talk. Plenty of people to argue with, agree with, or have a adult discussion with.chang50 wrote:Oh that tired old canard again,'you hate Christianity',I suppose it was due an airing.Can you not recognise intellectual curiousity,bemusement,bafflement?I want to understand the longevity and enduring nature of particular myths such as Christianity as opposed to the vast majority that rise briefly and disappear.Are you so emotionally invested in your beliefs that you have to automatically ascribe ill motives to any outsider who sincerely questions those beliefs?I hope not because it makes adult discussion very difficult..patches70 wrote:And can you not see how you are projecting what Theocracies, States and the injustices individuals did in those times to blaming individuals of today who have never committed such atrocities?chang50 wrote: Your point would have more force if Christians had behaved a little bit more like they were supposed to over the last 2000 years.
Your obvious hatred of Christianity clouds you perception so that you assume Christians of today are like those of 2000 years ago.
You blame the mistakes of those in the past on those who live today.
It is very short sighted and bigoted if you think about it honestly....
Oh, forgive me if I misinterpreted your meaning. Are you saying you don't have a bias against Christianity?chang50 wrote: What a bizarre outburst,it's my firm opinion that to say someone hates Christianity as a kneejerk reaction to any honest scepticism/questioning is somewhat immature,and I suspect you would not like it either.
So for the last 2000 years, the entire span of Christianity, Christians haven't behaved? How are Christians supposed to behave?chang50 wrote:Your point would have more force if Christians had behaved a little bit more like they were supposed to over the last 2000 years.