What in the actual f*ck?

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Post Reply
User avatar
BigBallinStalin
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 11:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham
Contact:
Contact BigBallinStalin

Re: What in the actual f*ck?

Post by BigBallinStalin »

Nordik wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:
Nordik wrote:
nietzsche wrote:BBS has a point, if prostitution was legal, we would have cheaper, safer and better quality prostitutes. Prostitutes would have safer jobs as well.

The law was there, the lawyers knew how to use it.


Not to mention less human trafficking. And less people being forced into it in general. As well as a bunch of other rather large issues.

I have yet to see a decent argument for keeping prostitution illegal.


You sound like a libertarian. You might want to clean your fingertips after typing all of that.

I do not fall into your American categories. I'm European left wing. Relatively far left at that.


Even Aquinas (or Augustine?) supported the legalization of prostitution. If you had to shove him into a meaningless left-right dichotomy, then you'd call libertarians and Augustine right-wing. Of course, that wouldn't mean much, but it may help to reinforce your "us v. them" mentality.

Anyway, can you divulge more about your ideology? How are you on war, drugs, monetary policy, health care, insurance, financial exchange, pollution, courts, policing, etc.?
Top
User avatar
ooge
Posts: 594
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:31 am
Location: under a bridge

Re: What in the actual f*ck?

Post by ooge »

This also occurred in Texas,The you tube clip is long but it is worth listening to.He was cleared by a grand jury.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Horn_s ... ontroversy

Changing of laws, what should seem illegal becomes legal as is the case with Woody's example and this one as well.
Image
Top
User avatar
ooge
Posts: 594
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:31 am
Location: under a bridge

Re: What in the actual f*ck?

Post by ooge »

The NRA lobby's for laws to be changed,States that are republican controlled comply,the result is you end up with the example woody gave and the example I gave.
Image
Top
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: What in the actual f*ck?

Post by Woodruff »

ooge wrote:The NRA lobby's for laws to be changed,States that are republican controlled comply,the result is you end up with the example woody gave and the example I gave.


Truthfully, I don't have much problem with the law as far as it regards your household and someone breaking into it. I do have a problem with it legitimizing cases such as what I brought up in the original post of this thread, as well as neighbors taking action toward your property (as that can lead to some pretty serious misunderstandings when lethality is involved).

So the law in general is ok by me. But it definitely needs to be refined significantly.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Top
User avatar
ooge
Posts: 594
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:31 am
Location: under a bridge

Re: What in the actual f*ck?

Post by ooge »

Woodruff wrote:
ooge wrote:The NRA lobby's for laws to be changed,States that are republican controlled comply,the result is you end up with the example woody gave and the example I gave.


Truthfully, I don't have much problem with the law as far as it regards your household and someone breaking into it. I do have a problem with it legitimizing cases such as what I brought up in the original post of this thread, as well as neighbors taking action toward your property (as that can lead to some pretty serious misunderstandings when lethality is involved).

So the law in general is ok by me. But it definitely needs to be refined significantly.


The original castle law is fine and I support it as well,the law has been expanded though into stand your ground as well as expansion of the castle law. Its as if the lessons that were learned in the early 1900's have to be learned again. I am it bit disappointed more people have not looked at or commented on the youtube video I posted,it is the rare ocation that all the evidence you need to decide guilt or innocences is available.
Image
Top
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: What in the actual f*ck?

Post by Woodruff »

ooge wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
ooge wrote:The NRA lobby's for laws to be changed,States that are republican controlled comply,the result is you end up with the example woody gave and the example I gave.


Truthfully, I don't have much problem with the law as far as it regards your household and someone breaking into it. I do have a problem with it legitimizing cases such as what I brought up in the original post of this thread, as well as neighbors taking action toward your property (as that can lead to some pretty serious misunderstandings when lethality is involved).

So the law in general is ok by me. But it definitely needs to be refined significantly.


The original castle law is fine and I support it as well,the law has been expanded though into stand your ground as well as expansion of the castle law. Its as if the lessons that were learned in the early 1900's have to be learned again.


Indeed.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Top
User avatar
ooge
Posts: 594
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:31 am
Location: under a bridge

Re: What in the actual f*ck?

Post by ooge »

http://www.propublica.org/article/five- ... know-about a few more examples.
Image
Top
User avatar
thegreekdog
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:55 am
Gender: Male
Location: Philadelphia

Re: What in the actual f*ck?

Post by thegreekdog »

ITT

- A guy gets acquitted using castle law.
- Castle laws in Texas are invalid.

In the education thread

- 15 teachers do stupid things.
- Indoctrination of children by teachers.
Image
Top
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: What in the actual f*ck?

Post by Woodruff »

thegreekdog wrote:ITT

- A guy gets acquitted using castle law.
- Castle laws in Texas are invalid.


Actually, no. My original post was regarding a particular interpretation of the
"Stand Your Ground" laws. A really mind-bogglingly stupid interpretation in
which a person's life is worth a broken contract. In fact,
I have stated that I support the idea of the Castle law in its basic sense. Ooge
said the same thing.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Top
User avatar
DirtyDishSoap
Posts: 9197
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:42 pm
Gender: Male

Re: What in the actual f*ck?

Post by DirtyDishSoap »

Could have came out different. It's not like it was an armed robbery in your home, of which then I could understand.

That and it's $150...It's really not that much money.
Dukasaur wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.

Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.

ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
Top
User avatar
thegreekdog
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:55 am
Gender: Male
Location: Philadelphia

Re: What in the actual f*ck?

Post by thegreekdog »

Woodruff wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:ITT

- A guy gets acquitted using castle law.
- Castle laws in Texas are invalid.


Actually, no. My original post was regarding a particular interpretation of the
"Stand Your Ground" laws. A really mind-bogglingly stupid interpretation in
which a person's life is worth a broken contract. In fact,
I have stated that I support the idea of the Castle law in its basic sense. Ooge
said the same thing.


I respectfully disagree.

Woodruff wrote:the law has been expanded though into stand your ground as well as expansion of the castle law
Image
Top
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: What in the actual f*ck?

Post by Woodruff »

thegreekdog wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:ITT

- A guy gets acquitted using castle law.
- Castle laws in Texas are invalid.


Actually, no. My original post was regarding a particular interpretation of the
"Stand Your Ground" laws. A really mind-bogglingly stupid interpretation in
which a person's life is worth a broken contract. In fact,
I have stated that I support the idea of the Castle law in its basic sense. Ooge
said the same thing.


I respectfully disagree.

Woodruff wrote:the law has been expanded though into stand your ground as well as expansion of the castle law


You're going to have to explain where that quote shows how I am against the Castle law in its basic sense. Because, as far as I can tell, it does no such thing. As opposed to this statement, which clearly shows my actual view of the Castle law in its basic sense:

Woodruff wrote:Truthfully, I don't have much problem with the law as far as it regards your household and someone breaking into it. I do have a problem with it legitimizing cases such as what I brought up in the original post of this thread, as well as neighbors taking action toward your property (as that can lead to some pretty serious misunderstandings when lethality is involved).

So the law in general is ok by me. But it definitely needs to be refined significantly.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Top
User avatar
pimpdave
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:15 am
Gender: Male
Location: Anti Tea Party Death Squad Task Force Headquarters
Contact:
Contact pimpdave

Re: What in the actual f*ck?

Post by pimpdave »

Shooting hoes that don't put out was invented at McGill University in 1987.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”