Moderator: Cartographers

can you give an example? because there isn't much difference between flat and soothing and restful to me..mibi wrote:lake Mich is still flat and ugly. Throw a nice soothing gradient in there. The rest of the map is a texture bonanza, let the eye rest somewhere.
Here you are. When the entire map, while looking cool, but is entirely filled with art, textures, filters, etc, the eye needs some space to rest and to give the image some balance. Something like this does that for me.Tisha wrote:can you give an example? because there isn't much difference between flat and soothing and restful to me..mibi wrote:lake Mich is still flat and ugly. Throw a nice soothing gradient in there. The rest of the map is a texture bonanza, let the eye rest somewhere.
mibi wrote:Here you are. When the entire map, while looking cool, but is entirely filled with art, textures, filters, etc, the eye needs some space to rest and to give the image some balance. Something like this does that for me.Tisha wrote:can you give an example? because there isn't much difference between flat and soothing and restful to me..mibi wrote:lake Mich is still flat and ugly. Throw a nice soothing gradient in there. The rest of the map is a texture bonanza, let the eye rest somewhere.
CTA runs the rail lines in Chicago...... it's just elevated in the downtown area- no ? Called "L, El" as slang because it runs above the streets .?azezzo wrote:those train lines are not Metra lines, rather they belong to the CTA.
the Metra is a different entity and runs on different tracks, goes to different locations, pretty much a suburban train line that does come into chicago. The "el" is the elevated tracks for the cta
oh, and i liked the old trees, but realize you cant make every one happy.
It's Norridge and Harwood Heights --- inside Chicago but technically not Chicago nor part of city limits.Industrial Helix wrote:
The hole between norwood and dunning... what is that? Inconsequential, but just curious.
Hehee-- prolly should've kept him.Risky_Stud wrote:NIcely done Scott!
But where's Michael?
Uh, I don't think the Chicago Transit Authority runs Metra, and maybe if they do at some administrative level, most Chicagoans (myself included) consider the two to be separate systems.Scott-Land wrote: CTA runs the rail lines in Chicago...... it's just elevated in the downtown area- no ? Called "L, El" as slang because it runs above the streets .?
I was thinkin a shaded outine of him jumpin the train to the left.Scott-Land wrote:Hehee-- prolly should've kept him.Risky_Stud wrote:NIcely done Scott!
But where's Michael?


They are two different rail systems-- both run by CTA. Prolly where I got confused. I lived in North Loop for awhile and never took the rail out of the city. And I eat ketchup on my hot dog and order thin crust pizza....Wolffystyle wrote:Uh, I don't think the Chicago Transit Authority runs Metra, and maybe if they do at some administrative level, most Chicagoans (myself included) consider the two to be separate systems.Scott-Land wrote: CTA runs the rail lines in Chicago...... it's just elevated in the downtown area- no ? Called "L, El" as slang because it runs above the streets .?
I was going to have a small view window of the loop station without the rails. Something like a magnifying glass but no magnifying.Wolffystyle wrote:Game Play comments:
- I am having a hard time initially seeing what borders what near the loop with the El tracks above the borders. Chance to make the Orange loop more realistic and a little wider so as to view the borders in the middle there?
The north side of the territory doesn't come into play as it has 2 impassables. I had outlined the lake that allowed to see the territory division better but someone posted earlier to remove it so I did.Wolffystyle wrote:Same goes for the south side. What territory does the little area to east of lake calumet belong to? if it's south deering can you put the white circle right on the river there?
Again I had it unmarked then went back and labeled it. Totally agree that it's better without.Wolffystyle wrote:Is norridge a territory?, there's no white circle. I don't even think it should be labeled. Screw all those who don't know its not part of chicago. The city label makes it more confusing than if it were simply unlabeled.
Glad you took joliet out.
Wolffystyle wrote:[/list]
Foundry Comments:Can I play this soon?
- Yea, that Metra train looks awesome, but, you don't have any metra lines on this map. Keep the el lines, they're much better, and I need the blue one to get to the loop.
I assume back of the yards doesn't border near west side (my home) so you may want to cover the upper corner of back of the yards with more trees.
Wolffy
Not sure if I can work it in... originally I had the mj logo shadowed on the Sear's Tower. Well I just found out I don't have a train for him to jump anymore.Risky_Stud wrote:I was thinkin a shaded outine of him jumpin the train to the left.Scott-Land wrote:Hehee-- prolly should've kept him.Risky_Stud wrote:NIcely done Scott!
But where's Michael?
Wow thanks @!luxCRUSADER wrote:I love the forest ! As an avid camper, the THREE tone trees is reflection of the author's ability to grab the viewers attention to beauty ... AMAZING JOB !!!!!
I love the rail connections, as it relates to gameplay balance !
I love the Chicago Imagery with the train, and the building- and its actually the building that compelled me to type today at your site- when I don't really have the time, cuz of the many errands in front of me; but like I said this a DAMN GOOD MAP from a gamers point of view ... the art compels me to stare !!! the Chicago map itself makes it easy to see the choke points.. and then I am left drooling over my keyboard demanding to start a game NOW !!!![]()
I hope you'll be alright with the copyright to "Chicago Transit Authority"- looks like you'll be OK- as long as your not affiliated with it in any way![]()
What type of connection is that black and gray symbol between 'WEST PULLMAN' and 'SOUTH DEERING' ? I'm guessing its a bridge ?
And before I depart, I'm thinking you have already done this... but you might want to experiment with blending the opacity down as the eyes move from the main art work imagery of building and train as it approaches the map proper area ??? In either event that side is a little dark ... Quite Frankly, I don't know if that would improve things ... not sure...but what I am sure about is that this map is going all the way !!!!!!!!!
I CAN'T WAIT TO PLAY ON IT !!!
Good Job !- NO: ... GREAT JOB !!!!!!!!
Suppose I can-- but it should be clear that you can't hop over a terr to attack w/out it being bombardments.whitestazn88 wrote:write that the train stations attack adjacent train stations, otherwise the way its worded now is that you can attack any train station.
It's the shape of Chicago-- somewhat like Florida's pan handle. I've enlarged the current map to 110% taking the southern/northern borders to the edge. You don't gain much east/west at least nothing substantial and if anything, it looks as though parts of the map is missing. I prefer it the way it is over the other. Without distorting the map to make it larger east/west, I can't go any further north/south. I have about a 1/4 of inch I can shift to the left-- someone had mentioned that already.Night Strike wrote:It seems like there is way too much deadspace on the map, especially for when you have to scale it down for the small map.
