Moderator: Cartographers
That was fast! thank Ender516.ender516 wrote:Well, the fancy initials would have less effect on the legibility of the English bonus names than they do on the Gaelic names, since even without the first letter, the name is more recognizable. Your call, though. I may not get to the XML update tonight.
EDIT:
Well, I did get to it. This new version uses Gaelic names for the bonus zones and corrects the spelling of Isle of Man and changes Porhoet to Redones as seen on the latest map.
Celtic_7_Nations.1.7.xml
I'm a history professor too. I do feel like I know a bit of what I'm talking about. Britannia was the name the Romans used for all the British isles. Gaul was the name the Germans (in a modern English translation, I belive) used for the lands inhabited by latinized Celts, which kind of fits with the area it's used for here.The Bison King wrote:So I went with the Gaelic names after all. I confess it just makes more sense. I'm also sticking with the roman names for the non-playable area's, and I asked a friend of mine whose a history major, and his dads a history professor, they definitely called those regions Gaul and Brittania.


I don't see why this wouldn't work. Sure it makes the legend a little redundant but it's what I did on on Thyseneal, and no one seemed to complain then. I also added the english names into the large mini map.About the capital letters. I reckon they look quite good, but to me i seems a bit heavy handed to have both the small map to indicate where the bonus regions are, and the bonus written seperately. The simplest solution, to me, would be to write the bonuses on the small map.
Are you refering to the English names that appear above the bonuses in the large mini map? Why does that bother you? It doesn't affect the map at all and won't even appear in the XML. It's there for people who don't know much about Celtic culture and might be interested in it after playing this map.I must say that I would prefer if the map only had the Celtic names.
I know but I really really like them and I've been fighting for them for a really long time now. Plus there would be a big ugly empty space if I took them out.Also, the bonuses only need to be shown on the mini map.
The declaration of bonuses in the lower middle of the map seem unnecessary.
Yes we actually did cover this a Long long time ago, I rejected this idea.Now I have a suggestion and I am sorry if I am stating something that already has been discussed and rejected. I personally think the map seem a bit small and think that it could be interesting if you divided the waters into sections without bonuses, just like you were putting boats out. Possibly with a loss of troops in certain areas since you would not have a large troop sitting in the middle of the ocean for years in real life. It would add to the attack routes just as attacks by sea is more optional than from land.
I just think it would look better withoutThe Bison King wrote:Are you refering to the English names that appear above the bonuses in the large mini map? Why does that bother you?
Well it's only on the large, and most people only play on the small any way. Consider it an easter egg, a little something extra for people who are looking for it.paulk wrote:I just think it would look better withoutThe Bison King wrote:Are you refering to the English names that appear above the bonuses in the large mini map? Why does that bother you?
Thanks but hopefully I can change your opinion when California hit's graphicsBut once again, it looks very nice. I like the style and looks even more than with your Cali map man.

I love it...really.cairnswk wrote:
2. the small s on nation in the title is not the same as the rest of the letters
5. I'd soften also the colour of the dragons on the title to make them more part of the legend/title.
I don't understand what you mean by this. Could you explain it a bit more clearly? Why would writing the bonus twice make it any clearer to read?army of nobunaga wrote: on this one, Im not sure why you are recieving flack, I lOVE how you restated the bonuses... I FRIGGIN HATE maps that I need to squint my eyes and read a book on the bonus system like in umm.. well know map names.
but i love that you restated it.
This is true. and a good point. There needs to be something there, so it might as well be this.The Bison King wrote:I know but I really really like them and I've been fighting for them for a really long time now. Plus there would be a big ugly empty space if I took them out.paulk wrote:Also, the bonuses only need to be shown on the mini map.
The declaration of bonuses in the lower middle of the map seem unnecessary.


Because there is a picture for picture people.. and there are words for words people.tokle wrote:I don't understand what you mean by this. Could you explain it a bit more clearly? Why would writing the bonus twice make it any clearer to read?army of nobunaga wrote: on this one, Im not sure why you are recieving flack, I lOVE how you restated the bonuses... I FRIGGIN HATE maps that I need to squint my eyes and read a book on the bonus system like in umm.. well know map names.
but i love that you restated it.
This is true. and a good point. There needs to be something there, so it might as well be this.The Bison King wrote:I know but I really really like them and I've been fighting for them for a really long time now. Plus there would be a big ugly empty space if I took them out.paulk wrote:Also, the bonuses only need to be shown on the mini map.
The declaration of bonuses in the lower middle of the map seem unnecessary.
By the way, it seems to me that the colour of the A in Alba is wrong. Is it not supposed to be the same colour as the fill on the main map?
But there are words on the picture, so the words people get it twice over. I don't see how it makes a difference.army of nobunaga wrote:Because there is a picture for picture people.. and there are words for words people.tokle wrote:I don't understand what you mean by this. Could you explain it a bit more clearly? Why would writing the bonus twice make it any clearer to read?army of nobunaga wrote: on this one, Im not sure why you are recieving flack, I lOVE how you restated the bonuses... I FRIGGIN HATE maps that I need to squint my eyes and read a book on the bonus system like in umm.. well know map names.
but i love that you restated it.
This is true. and a good point. There needs to be something there, so it might as well be this.The Bison King wrote:I know but I really really like them and I've been fighting for them for a really long time now. Plus there would be a big ugly empty space if I took them out.paulk wrote:Also, the bonuses only need to be shown on the mini map.
The declaration of bonuses in the lower middle of the map seem unnecessary.
By the way, it seems to me that the colour of the A in Alba is wrong. Is it not supposed to be the same colour as the fill on the main map?
He also needs to fill space or It will look like crap. The only other way to fill that space is to write some celtic history crap or something there.
I just dont think It looks bad at all. But on the otherhand it doesnt matter to me. I suggest if you want him to remove it, you give him Ideas to fill taht space... its the whole build up something rather than say [I dont like it[ and tear it down.


Nah, I'm past that, sorry.BK, you could add some sort of Rune bonus too... put a rune in key spots and have like a city bonus for connecting the different runes..