Moderator: Community Team
There didn't seem to be much point to it.mpjh wrote:Read the post.
Idiot too.Napoleon Ier wrote:I know a fervent atheist who absolutely refuses to believe evolution. Clever person too.
What on earth would any atheist believe in if it wasn't evolution?Napoleon Ier wrote:Snorri, snorri... where's that famous open mind of yours, eh? Why the intellectual fascism?
That we're still waiting for a biological Galileo, just like Dawkins still thinks we need to wait for a cosmological Darwin.Snorri1234 wrote:What on earth would any atheist believe in if it wasn't evolution?Napoleon Ier wrote:Snorri, snorri... where's that famous open mind of yours, eh? Why the intellectual fascism?
That's not to say all intelligent people mustn't see this need either.mpjh wrote:I don't see any need to wait to take up the fact that evolution is how live on earth originated and developed.
Seems to me that there's a very limited number of possibilities when it comes to the origins of life. Given that life exists on this planet and you are unsure of its origin, the only possible explanations are thatNapoleon Ier wrote:That we're still waiting for a biological Galileo, just like Dawkins still thinks we need to wait for a cosmological Darwin.Snorri1234 wrote:What on earth would any atheist believe in if it wasn't evolution?Napoleon Ier wrote:Snorri, snorri... where's that famous open mind of yours, eh? Why the intellectual fascism?
How dare you? Jay is every bit as intellectual as Rambo.Frigidus wrote:We need to advertise this thread or something, get some new blood in here. Jay did his part, but he isn't an intellectual Rambo. We need more people on the other side of the argument! Same goes for the evolution thread.
Not to sound like an ignoramus or anything, but we're working on it.Lev306 wrote:Evolution makes sense, life can form from un-organic life, blah blah blah but how do we explain the formation of the universe? Sure we have the big bang theory, but what formed the big bang? Why can't there have been an intelligent creator that designed a universal law and system that eventually formed into what we know now?
I think that was implied in B. Or at least, it is a theory for the origin of life about the same as B.mpjh wrote:Those are not the only possibilities. It is possible that life began on this planet of its own accord. There is interesting work that hypothesizes that DNA, and subsequently life, developed from naturally occuring chemicals between the layers of mica stone. Chemicals and stone to life.
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
I know that was the cave-man's initial explanation for anything unknown. "If I don't understand it, god did it." However, we have learned a lot since then. We now know that the world is not flat, the earth orbits around the sun. There is more than one galaxy. The universe is expanding at an expanding rate. etc.etc.Lev306 wrote:I like to play devil's advocate(noticed the pun?) so I'll take the pro-creator side for now.
I skipped 290 pages so I might have missed something, but here goes anyway:
Evolution makes sense, life can form from un-organic life, blah blah blah but how do we explain the formation of the universe? Sure we have the big bang theory, but what formed the big bang? Why can't there have been an intelligent creator that designed a universal law and system that eventually formed into what we know now?

"If we reach out to one another we can coexist and even thrive together."jonesthecurl wrote:"Do forgive me if I'm wrong. But isn't that a load of old bollocks?"
Mel Smith

They really didn't.mpjh wrote:Lev306 wrote:
Science is all about the quest for answers to the unknown, and the process has been accelerating ever since the Arabs invented Algebra.
Where does spacetime come from though? Aha! Aha indeed...Snorri1234 wrote:I think that was implied in B. Or at least, it is a theory for the origin of life about the same as B.mpjh wrote:Those are not the only possibilities. It is possible that life began on this planet of its own accord. There is interesting work that hypothesizes that DNA, and subsequently life, developed from naturally occuring chemicals between the layers of mica stone. Chemicals and stone to life.
Exactly how it happened is up for debate, but one must note that that has nothing to do with the theory of evolution. Origin of life is not a part of the theory.
yes they didNapoleon Ier wrote:They really didn't.mpjh wrote:Lev306 wrote:
Science is all about the quest for answers to the unknown, and the process has been accelerating ever since the Arabs invented Algebra.