Moderator: Community Team
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
There are more unemployed people than vacancies, of course. Still, it's always fun to see a fantasy-land argument that all unemployed people are just being lazy and could get a job if they wanted.THORNHEART wrote:I just heard the government voted to extend umemployment checks to the unemployed for up to two years...maybe we could cut this program and make people get jobs
Well, you are correct of course, and him saying: make people get jobs is of course ridiculous, since if they simply cant, they lose everything, and just cost more people their jobs...and...most of the unemployed, paid into the unemployment insurance for years, and Ill bet most will still not even take out all they ever put into it....Symmetry wrote:There are more unemployed people than vacancies, of course. Still, it's always fun to see a fantasy-land argument that all unemployed people are just being lazy and could get a job if they wanted.THORNHEART wrote:I just heard the government voted to extend umemployment checks to the unemployed for up to two years...maybe we could cut this program and make people get jobs
I'm guessing you've never had too many problems on this front. I could well be wrong- but have you spent a long period outside of education or employment?
Cut all abuse. Even better. Though cutting abuse will of course require some government expenditures...Phatscotty wrote:we can cut unemployment benefit abuse. that better?
Refuse to believe all you want, but if there are more people looking for work than there are jobs available, then there will be people unemployed. It's easy to label them as lazy, or unwilling to work, but there have to be jobs that they can fill first.THORNHEART wrote:ok i have found a job within 3 weeks of looking every time i have gone job hunting....i understand for high paying jobs this is not realistic....
I refuse to believe someone can not find a job for 2 whole years if they search diligently. Maybe it comes down to laziness and knowing that they will get a free check they have no motivation...lol thats foolish to think surely? I mean when given a choice of free money or hard worked money people will always choose to work for it. also I don't think anyone that is physically capable of working needs a free check that long. Maybe the prolem if they really cant find a job is they need to stop expecting the perfect job and the perfect salary and take what they can get...also uncle sam is ALWAYS hiring and thats what i would do if i was truely deseperate not accept money for two years like a bum.
not if we can make employees more efficient. A short time after the first small waves of abusers are weeded out(the low hanging fruit/most blatant abusers), it should free up a few positions (even just 1 position) and more and more waves spread out, and can all be done without an extra penny. probably cost a bit for the drug test kits though, unless they already have a shit load of them. however, i dont imagine the drug kit costing more than just 1 week of unemployment benefits (300ish) and that saves money in itself since fraudulent benefits would not be paid out, frees up more cash. Send all the savings to pay down the debt, while also creating stimulus by cutting the taxes hopefully about the same amount the unemployment agency is no longer needing. create likewise programs in other wasteful agencies. make a dent in the debt.AAFitz wrote:Cut all abuse. Even better. Though cutting abuse will of course require some government expenditures...Phatscotty wrote:we can cut unemployment benefit abuse. that better?
You cannot get the kinds of jobs that most are on unemployment for. If a person has been making a certain amount for 10 years, they have been paying fica insurance based on that. They had no real reason to suspect we would have the biggest economic meltdown most of us have ever seen, so their expenses are probably relative to their income. So, they cant just go out and get that job you just got, though Im sure your spot will be available three weeks from now....because they simply cant survive on it. But more importantly, these people contributed that money. They paid in for 20 to 30 years in many cases, and that adds up to quite a bit. Granted, the money went to pay for those unemployed at the time, but still, they paid their dues. These people are not slackers for the most part. The jobs just arent there, and in many cases, its not really their fault.THORNHEART wrote:ok i have found a job within 3 weeks of looking every time i have gone job hunting....i understand for high paying jobs this is not realistic....
I refuse to believe someone can not find a job for 2 whole years if they search diligently. Maybe it comes down to laziness and knowing that they will get a free check they have no motivation...lol thats foolish to think surely? I mean when given a choice of free money or hard worked money people will always choose to work for it. also I don't think anyone that is physically capable of working needs a free check that long. Maybe the prolem if they really cant find a job is they need to stop expecting the perfect job and the perfect salary and take what they can get...also uncle sam is ALWAYS hiring and thats what i would do if i was truely deseperate not accept money for two years like a bum.
you missed this when you were on vacation. just pointing out, seeing some over lapping.THORNHEART wrote:ok i have found a job within 3 weeks of looking every time i have gone job hunting....i understand for high paying jobs this is not realistic....
I refuse to believe someone can not find a job for 2 whole years if they search diligently. Maybe it comes down to laziness and knowing that they will get a free check they have no motivation...lol thats foolish to think surely? I mean when given a choice of free money or hard worked money people will always choose to work for it. also I don't think anyone that is physically capable of working needs a free check that long. Maybe the prolem if they really cant find a job is they need to stop expecting the perfect job and the perfect salary and take what they can get...also uncle sam is ALWAYS hiring and thats what i would do if i was truely deseperate not accept money for two years like a bum.
Do you honestly think, that right now, if taxes are cut, that people are going to go out and spend that money, and put it into the economy?Phatscotty wrote:not if we can make employees more efficient. A short time after the first small waves of abusers are weeded out(the low hanging fruit/most blatant abusers), it should free up a few positions (even just 1 position) and more and more waves spread out, and can all be done without an extra penny. probably cost a bit for the drug test kits though, unless they already have a shit load of them. however, i dont imagine the drug kit costing more than just 1 week of unemployment benefits (300ish) and that saves money in itself since fraudulent benefits would not be paid out, frees up more cash. Send all the savings to pay down the debt, while also creating stimulus by cutting the taxes hopefully about the same amount the unemployment agency is no longer needing. create likewise programs in other wasteful agencies. make a dent in the debt.AAFitz wrote:Cut all abuse. Even better. Though cutting abuse will of course require some government expenditures...Phatscotty wrote:we can cut unemployment benefit abuse. that better?
Great. The stimulus was just a side project. I agree most people SHOULD be saving every penny, but saying that a majority or even considerable segment of people are saving every penny is not accurate. While we are on the right track, because more and more people are saving.AAFitz wrote:Do you honestly think, that right now, if taxes are cut, that people are going to go out and spend that money, and put it into the economy?Phatscotty wrote:not if we can make employees more efficient. A short time after the first small waves of abusers are weeded out(the low hanging fruit/most blatant abusers), it should free up a few positions (even just 1 position) and more and more waves spread out, and can all be done without an extra penny. probably cost a bit for the drug test kits though, unless they already have a shit load of them. however, i dont imagine the drug kit costing more than just 1 week of unemployment benefits (300ish) and that saves money in itself since fraudulent benefits would not be paid out, frees up more cash. Send all the savings to pay down the debt, while also creating stimulus by cutting the taxes hopefully about the same amount the unemployment agency is no longer needing. create likewise programs in other wasteful agencies. make a dent in the debt.AAFitz wrote:Cut all abuse. Even better. Though cutting abuse will of course require some government expenditures...Phatscotty wrote:we can cut unemployment benefit abuse. that better?
The reason why most are fighting for lower taxes, is because they realize how bad this is, and are trying to save every penny they can to weather the storm. A tax cut will not create any kind of stimulus whatsoever in this economy. The percentage that does anything but go into bank accounts of those who at the moment are still doing rather well, will be too small to matter.
I agree, the money should not be wasted, but at the same time, it does have to be collected, and in large part from the people who do not want to pay them....which of course is everyone....but If the economy slips further, or it gets worse, those few extra percentage points that hopefully....hopefully...hopefully go back into actually improving the economy, will save them from ever having to know what many others are feeling right now.
The problem is control of what is done with the money...and obviously so far, we have still seen so much waste and fraud in some areas, that it makes you question if anyone really is even taking this seriously.
So, I feel we paying taxes, have no choice but to pay them...we must invest them...we must help bail the ship, because while we may not have put the hole in it ourselves, we are sure as hell going to drown if it goes down. The fact that maybe its after everyone else has, is fairly irrlevant


Interestingly, in 20 years, before Obama care, the amount of money America will owe allows only for debt service and a little bit of social security. All the rest of the government will have to close down.Woodruff wrote:Given that I won't see one for 20+ years and not likely then...feel free.THORNHEART wrote:I think we ought to cut woodruffs social security check...
Precisely my point.Phatscotty wrote:Interestingly, in 20 years, before Obama care, the amount of money America will owe allows only for debt service and a little bit of social security. All the rest of the government will have to close down.Woodruff wrote:Given that I won't see one for 20+ years and not likely then...feel free.THORNHEART wrote:I think we ought to cut woodruffs social security check...
That 20 years does not include ObamaCare. They are crashing it on purpose, which explains why you can literally see the politicians GRABBING AS MUCH SHIT AS THEY CAN!Woodruff wrote:Precisely my point.Phatscotty wrote:Interestingly, in 20 years, before Obama care, the amount of money America will owe allows only for debt service and a little bit of social security. All the rest of the government will have to close down.Woodruff wrote:Given that I won't see one for 20+ years and not likely then...feel free.THORNHEART wrote:I think we ought to cut woodruffs social security check...
I might argue that this is actually a savings. My rationale is this...by giving the free breakfast to ALL children, nobody has to track "who gets it and who doesn't", which can be a paperwork nightmare. Someone's gotta handle all that paperwork, both at the school level and the school district level...that's pay. It may well be cheaper just to give it to everyone...if that makes sense.thegreekdog wrote: (2) In Philadelphia, every public school child gets "free" breakfast, whether their parents provide them breakfast or not. I want that cut.
So you think companies ought to be able to sell, as "pure" water that would not even meet basic tapwater standards for purity? Because that is what is at stake. Right now, bottled water is less highly regulated than your drinking water. AND remember, we are talking about profit-making companies, so by rights they ought to be taxes to pay for this supervision.john9blue wrote:I'm really not sure why I said that, as bottled water is one of the few areas in which the government trounces the private industry. I guess it just came to my mind when thinking of dumb wastes of money. Bottled water is a monument to the stupidity of man. .
I might agree with your possible argument, except that it's Philadelphia. As someone very intelligent once said, "I could make Philadelphia fiscally responsible again. I'd just go to every fifth office and fire the person in the office."Woodruff wrote:I might argue that this is actually a savings. My rationale is this...by giving the free breakfast to ALL children, nobody has to track "who gets it and who doesn't", which can be a paperwork nightmare. Someone's gotta handle all that paperwork, both at the school level and the school district level...that's pay. It may well be cheaper just to give it to everyone...if that makes sense.thegreekdog wrote: (2) In Philadelphia, every public school child gets "free" breakfast, whether their parents provide them breakfast or not. I want that cut.