Back to the Future Mafia (Mafia Win!)

[nagerous]

Hmm, so you don't FOS the person trying to frame you. Avoiding an OMGUS vote, as to not appear scummy. I suppose that is only a clever tactic that scum would do.

What are you going on about?

[Hank44Soccer]

Rivalries- it appears that rivalries have alrady appeared. Who will be lynched? Could it be Diddle or will I take heat for posting this? Who knows what the future will bring. Will somebody post a no no, will diddle get put where he deserves along with any other scum? Who knows how this will turn out but with any luck the scum will be lynched. NOW WHO'S WITH ME!!!!

[diddle]

Your 'persuasive' writing is of very poor quality. Try and put together a decent case against me to justify all this heat your giving me. Until then I don't think anybody will mind if I Vote Hank44Soccer

[nagerous]

vote DoomYoshi for not posting yet.. submarining?

[VioIet]

But I'm not scum? Plus, I currently have two people voting for me, so it would be impossible to choose one to vote for in return (since at this point in the game votes can never be backed up with any real substance, bar the knowledge of a day cop, which is unlikely) as well as being incredibly stupid. Clutching at straws a bit are we VioIet? Desperate for a lynch hmmmmm?

If i was desperate for a lynch, I would have placed a vote on your already weak joke bandwagon.
I have not voted a single person yet, so how is that being desperate for a lynch?

What are you going on about?

Why don't you read and find out?

[diddle]

But I'm not scum? Plus, I currently have two people voting for me, so it would be impossible to choose one to vote for in return (since at this point in the game votes can never be backed up with any real substance, bar the knowledge of a day cop, which is unlikely) as well as being incredibly stupid. Clutching at straws a bit are we VioIet? Desperate for a lynch hmmmmm?

If i was desperate for a lynch, I would have placed a vote on your already weak joke bandwagon.
I have not voted a single person yet, so how is that being desperate for a lynch?

Well you did heavily imply I was scum, with nothing to base it on.

[VioIet]

You, yourself stated that there is nothing to go on Day 1, and no leads.

I mentioned that your tactic is clever, and could be an early strategy to make yourself appear non-scummy. It is good logic, so I mentioned the possibility of you being scum. Yes it is grasping at straws, because as you said, there is nothing to go on Day 1.

You also vote poor Hank; accuse his clever and creative post as being bad writing. Already you are trying to make him appear scummy.

How is what you are doing any different from what I am? You also have nothing to base it on.

Only difference is- that you have cast a vote.

[diddle]

I've done nothing particularly clever or tactical in this game, I'm just trying to promote conversation. And as for my comments on hanks post, I stand by them. It was poorly written - his intentions to single me out were clear and to go around saying 'will diddle get put where he deserves along with any other scum?' is a very bold statement, for any day, let alone day 1. I believe all I'd done before that is make a non-serious FOS because he forgot to bold his vote. I never seriously thought that would make him Mafia. Interestingly, he's been online for the past hour or so, and is yet to defend/explain himself, but you seem perfectly happy to stand up for him. Just food for thought for the players who are quietly onlooking...

And I think what we're doing is completely different. For a start my vote wasnt for you, it was for hank, so I find it odd that your taking such an interest in me, and as I've already said I think my vote for him was completely justified, by day 1 standards anyway.

[nagerous]

But I'm not scum? Plus, I currently have two people voting for me, so it would be impossible to choose one to vote for in return (since at this point in the game votes can never be backed up with any real substance, bar the knowledge of a day cop, which is unlikely) as well as being incredibly stupid. Clutching at straws a bit are we VioIet? Desperate for a lynch hmmmmm?

If i was desperate for a lynch, I would have placed a vote on your already weak joke bandwagon.
I have not voted a single person yet, so how is that being desperate for a lynch?

What are you going on about?

Why don't you read and find out?

That is a seriously condescending attitude. Unvote Vote VioIet

[safariguy5]

Vote Count

diddle(2)-tails, hank
kernov(2)-jeraado, drabod
jeraado(1)-kernov
Hank(1)-diddle
VioIet(1)-nag

With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

I'll prod DoomYoshi, got plenty of replacements otherwise.

[VioIet]

That is a seriously condescending attitude. Unvote Vote VioIet

Well, what the hell do you expect after you asked such a condescending question? For me to respond with sugar and spice?

I've done nothing particularly clever or tactical in this game, I'm just trying to promote conversation.

As am I.

For a start my vote wasnt for you

Nor is mine.

And as for my comments on hanks post, I stand by them. It was poorly written - his intentions to single me out were clear and to go around saying 'will diddle get put where he deserves along with any other scum?' is a very bold statement, for any day, let alone day 1. I believe all I'd done before that is make a non-serious FOS because he forgot to bold his vote. I never seriously thought that would make him Mafia. Interestingly, he's been online for the past hour or so, and is yet to defend/explain himself, but you seem perfectly happy to stand up for him. Just food for thought for the players who are quietly onlooking...

Where do you see me defending Hank? And are we even talking about the same post by him? I think not, as I thought his rivalries post was clever and funny. I think you are referencing something from the previous page.

I think my vote for him was completely justified, by day 1 standards anyway.

Yes, just as I think my possibly scum comment to you is completely justified by Day 1 standards.

[safariguy5]

Announcement

Anarkistsdream has replaced Downey.

[TA1LGUNN3R]

Hm wtf happened? I always hate that awkward phase between joke votes and when someone tries to build a case on nothing, and it just comes down to bickering.

vote Vio for jumping to conclusions.

-Tails

[jeraado]

Hm wtf happened? I always hate that awkward phase between joke votes and when someone tries to build a case on nothing, and it just comes down to bickering.

+1

At least the joke bit is over, now time to do some proper scumhunting

unvote

[diddle]

I've done nothing particularly clever or tactical in this game, I'm just trying to promote conversation.

As am I.

Hmm, so you don't FOS the person trying to frame you. Avoiding an OMGUS vote, as to not appear scummy. I suppose that is only a clever tactic that scum would do.

To me that seems like an effort to put unessecary and undeserved pressure on me. You've been quite clever to not vote for me (yet, i only imagine its a matter of time before you do) because that would be extremely suspicious, since even nagerous has pointed out that the above quote from you makes little sense.

For a start my vote wasnt for you

Nor is mine.

Well here I think your missing the point, according to the most recent vote count, you havent actually voted at all.

And as for my comments on hanks post, I stand by them. It was poorly written - his intentions to single me out were clear and to go around saying 'will diddle get put where he deserves along with any other scum?' is a very bold statement, for any day, let alone day 1. I believe all I'd done before that is make a non-serious FOS because he forgot to bold his vote. I never seriously thought that would make him Mafia. Interestingly, he's been online for the past hour or so, and is yet to defend/explain himself, but you seem perfectly happy to stand up for him. Just food for thought for the players who are quietly onlooking...

Where do you see me defending Hank? And are we even talking about the same post by him? I think not, as I thought his rivalries post was clever and funny. I think you are referencing something from the previous page.

Where do I see you defending Hank? Um, here:

You also vote poor Hank; accuse his clever and creative post as being bad writing. Already you are trying to make him appear scummy.

Oh and here:

I thought his rivalries post was clever and funny

It was not clever of funny, unless the joke was he was pretending to be really really stupid. To prove that, lets analyse it bit by bit.

Rivalries- it appears that rivalries have alrady (spelt wrong) appeared. Who will be lynched? Could it be Diddle or will I take heat for posting this? (ok, so why has he mentioned me here? I'm the only person he mentions in the whole post, and this is just after I removed my FOS from him) Who knows what the future will bring. Will somebody post a no no, will diddle get put where he deserves along with any other scum? (So now I'm scum? Where's the basis for this accusation? Hank was worried someone would say a no-no, and I think he just has) Who knows how this will turn out but with any luck the scum will be lynched. NOW WHO'S WITH ME!!!! (So now in his defence he tries to make himself seem anti-scum in the most obvious way, its pathetic. Its like sitting at home watching the news and saying 'oh, i do hope that serial rapist gets caught' - well of course you do! you're not going to blurt out that you hope he runs free and continues raping, because that would only make others suspicious of you being a rapist!).

I think my vote for him was completely justified, by day 1 standards anyway.

Yes, just as I think my possibly scum comment to you is completely justified by Day 1 standards.

What are the reasons behind your accusations again? I'm pretty sure at the time it was because I didn't vote for someone. Nobody would have voted for Hank in that original position, but because I didnt it makes me scum? Riiight...

I would also like to draw people's attention to this:

But I'm not scum? Plus, I currently have two people voting for me, so it would be impossible to choose one to vote for in return (since at this point in the game votes can never be backed up with any real substance, bar the knowledge of a day cop, which is unlikely) as well as being incredibly stupid. Clutching at straws a bit are we VioIet? Desperate for a lynch hmmmmm?

If i was desperate for a lynch, I would have placed a vote on your already weak joke bandwagon.
I have not voted a single person yet, so how is that being desperate for a lynch?

Well you did heavily imply I was scum, with nothing to base it on.

You, yourself stated that there is nothing to go on Day 1, and no leads.

Ok, so why accuse me?

And Hank, whenever you want to come and speak up, instead of letting VioIet do it for you, feel free.

[DoomYoshi]

Hey guys, sorry I forgot about this game. I will start following from here on

[Anarkistsdream]

Confirm that I'm replacing someone... haha. I'll read up and post later. Gotta head out for now.

[VioIet]

I thought his post was clever. I stand by that. The rivalries bit was funny

What are the reasons behind your accusations again? I'm pretty sure at the time it was because I didn't vote for someone. Nobody would have voted for Hank in that original position, but because I didnt it makes me scum? Riiight...

What I was trying to say was that you were cleverly not voting for the person/people who voted for you. Normally when someone does that, people scream OMGUS, and it makes you look scummy. I commented that it was clever of you to avoid doing that, but you could possibly be scummy for it.

You, yourself stated that there is nothing to go on Day 1, and no leads.

Ok, so why accuse me?

Same reason as you- to promote conversation. It looks like we are the two bold ones, to get this game moving. I don't know how that point was misunderstood the first time.

Well here I think your missing the point, according to the most recent vote count, you havent actually voted at all.

Well then if you think I am missing the point, why don't you be so kind as to explain it to me, since I obviously didn't get it the first time around.

You say i am heavily targeting you. Wouldn't those who actually have a vote on you, be the ones actually targeting you. I haven't voted yet- as there are no real suspects.
I think you are taking two comments that were meant to be jokes (mine and hanks), way out of proportion. Why so overly defensive here?

[diddle]

I wouldn't say I was being overly defensive, more Hank was being offensive. He hasn't just made a 'jokey' comment, he's voted for me aswell. I don't think there's much mileage in our argument, we need a contribution from the man himself, El Hanko.

[DoomYoshi]

vote diddle. For freaking out.

[Hank44Soccer]

I don't want Violet to be all defensive but When I posted that coment I said it so it would make the game intresting and start to stir things up and the sad part is Diddle you let it get to you

[Hank44Soccer]

It seems like controversy is key in this game

[jeraado]

Diddle, you sure are coming across overly defensive. Often that can be because you have something to hide. Since you're new round these here parts, I'll chalk it up to that for now, but it's a little nugget of info that I'll file away.

I don't really see anything wrong with violet's posts? She may not be coming across nicely, but the points she's raised are legit. Other than being a little over-zealous, at least she's prompting conversation.

[TA1LGUNN3R]

Diddle, you sure are coming across overly defensive. Often that can be because you have something to hide. Since you're new round these here parts, I'll chalk it up to that for now, but it's a little nugget of info that I'll file away.

Diddle's an old-timer.

-Tails

[jeraado]

Diddle, you sure are coming across overly defensive. Often that can be because you have something to hide. Since you're new round these here parts, I'll chalk it up to that for now, but it's a little nugget of info that I'll file away.

Diddle's an old-timer.

-Tails

In that case FOS diddle