Dancing Mustard wrote:Surely rich people have less rights than the poor people, what with having more stuff taken away from them just because they weren't too lazy to get off of their behinds.
You don't understand Communism. That's a fact. Goal of the communism isn't just to rob rich and give to the poor. Communism was invented to give poor hope (false hope, it turns out ) that all the people in world can be equal in all. That's why medical care was almost free there (if you don't include bribes to speed thing up ).
But it takes hope away from rich people! How is that fair?
And how can you say I don't understand it? I read both sections of the textbook on it, and I stayed after class to ask questions.
Yeah Meggy, !!!
DM, which of this statements you find more true?
1) Most of the people in this world are rich! 2) Most of the people in this world are poor!
BTW You are wrong if you think that Communism didn't had it's own elites.
Neither of those statements has anything to do with communism sucking or not sucking. It doesn't matter how many rich people there are and how many poor ones. It's still not fair to try to screw over rich people just because they are in the minority.
And what is with those smileys, they make you look like Xtratabasco
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
Dancing Mustard wrote:Surely rich people have less rights than the poor people, what with having more stuff taken away from them just because they weren't too lazy to get off of their behinds.
You don't understand Communism. That's a fact. Goal of the communism isn't just to rob rich and give to the poor. Communism was invented to give poor hope (false hope, it turns out ) that all the people in world can be equal in all. That's why medical care was almost free there (if you don't include bribes to speed thing up ).
But it takes hope away from rich people! How is that fair?
And how can you say I don't understand it? I read both sections of the textbook on it, and I stayed after class to ask questions.
Yeah Meggy, !!!
DM, which of this statements you find more true?
1) Most of the people in this world are rich! 2) Most of the people in this world are poor!
BTW You are wrong if you think that Communism didn't had it's own elites.
Neither of those statements has anything to do with communism sucking or not sucking. It doesn't matter how many rich people there are and how many poor ones. It's still not fair to try to screw over rich people just because they are in the minority.
And what is with those smileys, they make you look like Xtratabasco
It doesn't matter how many rich people there are and how many poor ones.
Quite a moronic statement to make in lieu of communism, the very subject of this thread.
Dancing Mustard wrote:Surely rich people have less rights than the poor people, what with having more stuff taken away from them just because they weren't too lazy to get off of their behinds.
You don't understand Communism. That's a fact. Goal of the communism isn't just to rob rich and give to the poor. Communism was invented to give poor hope (false hope, it turns out ) that all the people in world can be equal in all. That's why medical care was almost free there (if you don't include bribes to speed thing up ).
But it takes hope away from rich people! How is that fair?
And how can you say I don't understand it? I read both sections of the textbook on it, and I stayed after class to ask questions.
Yeah Meggy, !!!
DM, which of this statements you find more true?
1) Most of the people in this world are rich! 2) Most of the people in this world are poor!
BTW You are wrong if you think that Communism didn't had it's own elites.
Neither of those statements has anything to do with communism sucking or not sucking. It doesn't matter how many rich people there are and how many poor ones. It's still not fair to try to screw over rich people just because they are in the minority.
And what is with those smileys, they make you look like Xtratabasco
So it's OK when rich minority (1%) rules the poor majority (99%)?
How do you think the French revolution started in 1789?
heavycola wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:Man, this thread was great. A whopping 230 pages with noone changing their viewpoint.
I actually converted around page 198. Unfortunately, I converted to satanism.
Dancing Mustard wrote:Surely rich people have less rights than the poor people, what with having more stuff taken away from them just because they weren't too lazy to get off of their behinds.
You don't understand Communism. That's a fact. Goal of the communism isn't just to rob rich and give to the poor. Communism was invented to give poor hope (false hope, it turns out ) that all the people in world can be equal in all. That's why medical care was almost free there (if you don't include bribes to speed thing up ).
But it takes hope away from rich people! How is that fair?
And how can you say I don't understand it? I read both sections of the textbook on it, and I stayed after class to ask questions.
Yeah Meggy, !!!
DM, which of this statements you find more true?
1) Most of the people in this world are rich! 2) Most of the people in this world are poor!
BTW You are wrong if you think that Communism didn't had it's own elites.
Neither of those statements has anything to do with communism sucking or not sucking. It doesn't matter how many rich people there are and how many poor ones. It's still not fair to try to screw over rich people just because they are in the minority.
And what is with those smileys, they make you look like Xtratabasco
So it's OK when rich minority (1%) rules the poor majority (99%)?
How do you think the French revolution started in 1789?
The rich rule???? WTF? When did this happen... and where was I when it did?
The French revolution did not occur because of a wide gap between the rich and poor you fucking cocksucker.
Dancing Mustard wrote:Surely rich people have less rights than the poor people, what with having more stuff taken away from them just because they weren't too lazy to get off of their behinds.
You don't understand Communism. That's a fact. Goal of the communism isn't just to rob rich and give to the poor. Communism was invented to give poor hope (false hope, it turns out ) that all the people in world can be equal in all. That's why medical care was almost free there (if you don't include bribes to speed thing up ).
But it takes hope away from rich people! How is that fair?
And how can you say I don't understand it? I read both sections of the textbook on it, and I stayed after class to ask questions.
Yeah Meggy, !!!
DM, which of this statements you find more true?
1) Most of the people in this world are rich! 2) Most of the people in this world are poor!
BTW You are wrong if you think that Communism didn't had it's own elites.
Neither of those statements has anything to do with communism sucking or not sucking. It doesn't matter how many rich people there are and how many poor ones. It's still not fair to try to screw over rich people just because they are in the minority.
And what is with those smileys, they make you look like Xtratabasco
So it's OK when rich minority (1%) rules the poor majority (99%)?
How do you think the French revolution started in 1789?
The rich rule???? WTF? When did this happen... and where was I when it did?
The French revolution did not occur because of a wide gap between the rich and poor you fucking cocksucker.
Are you sure? Maybe you overslept that class in your kindergarten.
Last edited by ignotus on Thu Dec 20, 2007 12:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
heavycola wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:Man, this thread was great. A whopping 230 pages with noone changing their viewpoint.
I actually converted around page 198. Unfortunately, I converted to satanism.
Dancing Mustard wrote:Surely rich people have less rights than the poor people, what with having more stuff taken away from them just because they weren't too lazy to get off of their behinds.
You don't understand Communism. That's a fact. Goal of the communism isn't just to rob rich and give to the poor. Communism was invented to give poor hope (false hope, it turns out ) that all the people in world can be equal in all. That's why medical care was almost free there (if you don't include bribes to speed thing up ).
But it takes hope away from rich people! How is that fair?
And how can you say I don't understand it? I read both sections of the textbook on it, and I stayed after class to ask questions.
Yeah Meggy, !!!
DM, which of this statements you find more true?
1) Most of the people in this world are rich! 2) Most of the people in this world are poor!
BTW You are wrong if you think that Communism didn't had it's own elites.
Neither of those statements has anything to do with communism sucking or not sucking. It doesn't matter how many rich people there are and how many poor ones. It's still not fair to try to screw over rich people just because they are in the minority.
And what is with those smileys, they make you look like Xtratabasco
It doesn't matter how many rich people there are and how many poor ones.
Quite a moronic statement to make in lieu of communism, the very subject of this thread.
It's strange, I want to laugh at your noobish attempts at trollery but your red text is so... charismatic and yet grave...
How do you make it red when you type? I feel my own posts could really do with that devilish brand of 'look at me!' gravitas.
Dancing Mustard wrote:Surely rich people have less rights than the poor people, what with having more stuff taken away from them just because they weren't too lazy to get off of their behinds.
You don't understand Communism. That's a fact. Goal of the communism isn't just to rob rich and give to the poor. Communism was invented to give poor hope (false hope, it turns out ) that all the people in world can be equal in all. That's why medical care was almost free there (if you don't include bribes to speed thing up ).
But it takes hope away from rich people! How is that fair?
And how can you say I don't understand it? I read both sections of the textbook on it, and I stayed after class to ask questions.
Yeah Meggy, !!!
DM, which of this statements you find more true?
1) Most of the people in this world are rich! 2) Most of the people in this world are poor!
BTW You are wrong if you think that Communism didn't had it's own elites.
Neither of those statements has anything to do with communism sucking or not sucking. It doesn't matter how many rich people there are and how many poor ones. It's still not fair to try to screw over rich people just because they are in the minority.
And what is with those smileys, they make you look like Xtratabasco
So it's OK when rich minority (1%) rules the poor majority (99%)?
How do you think the French revolution started in 1789?
The rich rule???? WTF? When did this happen... and where was I when it did?
The French revolution did not occur because of a wide gap between the rich and poor you fucking cocksucker.
Are you sure? Maybe you overslept that class in your kindergarten.
Much of royalty was beheaded, yet there were many who were wealthier than royalty to be sure. Why did they not suffer the same fate? The French Revolution was not a result of rich vs poor you moron. It was the average French citizen rising up against their leaders, royalty. You do know about Tianemen Square yes? How about the recent Russian revolution? I did not think so. None too bright are you?
Dancing Mustard wrote:Surely rich people have less rights than the poor people, what with having more stuff taken away from them just because they weren't too lazy to get off of their behinds.
You don't understand Communism. That's a fact. Goal of the communism isn't just to rob rich and give to the poor. Communism was invented to give poor hope (false hope, it turns out ) that all the people in world can be equal in all. That's why medical care was almost free there (if you don't include bribes to speed thing up ).
But it takes hope away from rich people! How is that fair?
And how can you say I don't understand it? I read both sections of the textbook on it, and I stayed after class to ask questions.
Yeah Meggy, !!!
DM, which of this statements you find more true?
1) Most of the people in this world are rich! 2) Most of the people in this world are poor!
BTW You are wrong if you think that Communism didn't had it's own elites.
Neither of those statements has anything to do with communism sucking or not sucking. It doesn't matter how many rich people there are and how many poor ones. It's still not fair to try to screw over rich people just because they are in the minority.
And what is with those smileys, they make you look like Xtratabasco
It doesn't matter how many rich people there are and how many poor ones.
Quite a moronic statement to make in lieu of communism, the very subject of this thread.
It's strange, I want to laugh at your noobish attempts at trollery but your red text is so... charismatic and yet grave...
How do you make it red when you type? I feel my own posts could really do with that devilish brand of 'look at me!' gravitas.
Ah yes, the green-eyed monster of jealousy has made its scandalous appearance at last!
Dancing Mustard wrote:Surely rich people have less rights than the poor people, what with having more stuff taken away from them just because they weren't too lazy to get off of their behinds.
You don't understand Communism. That's a fact. Goal of the communism isn't just to rob rich and give to the poor. Communism was invented to give poor hope (false hope, it turns out ) that all the people in world can be equal in all. That's why medical care was almost free there (if you don't include bribes to speed thing up ).
But it takes hope away from rich people! How is that fair?
And how can you say I don't understand it? I read both sections of the textbook on it, and I stayed after class to ask questions.
Yeah Meggy, !!!
DM, which of this statements you find more true?
1) Most of the people in this world are rich! 2) Most of the people in this world are poor!
BTW You are wrong if you think that Communism didn't had it's own elites.
Neither of those statements has anything to do with communism sucking or not sucking. It doesn't matter how many rich people there are and how many poor ones. It's still not fair to try to screw over rich people just because they are in the minority.
And what is with those smileys, they make you look like Xtratabasco
So it's OK when rich minority (1%) rules the poor majority (99%)?
How do you think the French revolution started in 1789?
The rich rule???? WTF? When did this happen... and where was I when it did?
The French revolution did not occur because of a wide gap between the rich and poor you fucking cocksucker.
Are you sure? Maybe you overslept that class in your kindergarten.
Much of royalty was beheaded, yet there were many who were wealthier than royalty to be sure. Why did they not suffer the same fate? The French Revolution was not a result of rich vs poor you moron. It was the average French citizen rising up against their leaders, royalty. You do know about Tianemen Square yes? How about the recent Russian revolution? I did not think so. None too bright are you?
Nice monologue... Just a few mistakes in it. I have a couple of questions:
1) But you didn't answer why did French revolution started?
2) So only aristocrats were beheaded during the French revolution (remember Robespierre and Girondins)?
3) Tianemen or Tiananmen square?
4) Now that you mention it: These "recent" uprisings (Russia, China), what's their direct link to French revolution?
heavycola wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:Man, this thread was great. A whopping 230 pages with noone changing their viewpoint.
I actually converted around page 198. Unfortunately, I converted to satanism.
Der Fuhrer wrote: Only morons and retards believe in communism, an ideology that needs to go the way of the dodo bird. Any and all communists should be destroyed.
Ironic. You hate communism, and say it should be extinct, yet your name is that of an authoritarian leader. You should be extinct, you hypocrit.
You don't know the difference between communism and fascism now do you?
My point was that authoritarian/fascist parties are equally deserving of being extinct.
W00T!!! I can't express my ideas with words so I make my point with colour!
Dancing Mustard wrote:Surely rich people have less rights than the poor people, what with having more stuff taken away from them just because they weren't too lazy to get off of their behinds.
You don't understand Communism. That's a fact. Goal of the communism isn't just to rob rich and give to the poor. Communism was invented to give poor hope (false hope, it turns out ) that all the people in world can be equal in all. That's why medical care was almost free there (if you don't include bribes to speed thing up ).
But it takes hope away from rich people! How is that fair?
And how can you say I don't understand it? I read both sections of the textbook on it, and I stayed after class to ask questions.
Yeah Meggy, !!!
DM, which of this statements you find more true?
1) Most of the people in this world are rich! 2) Most of the people in this world are poor!
BTW You are wrong if you think that Communism didn't had it's own elites.
Neither of those statements has anything to do with communism sucking or not sucking. It doesn't matter how many rich people there are and how many poor ones. It's still not fair to try to screw over rich people just because they are in the minority.
And what is with those smileys, they make you look like Xtratabasco
So it's OK when rich minority (1%) rules the poor majority (99%)?
How do you think the French revolution started in 1789?
The rich rule???? WTF? When did this happen... and where was I when it did?
The French revolution did not occur because of a wide gap between the rich and poor you fucking cocksucker.
Are you sure? Maybe you overslept that class in your kindergarten.
Much of royalty was beheaded, yet there were many who were wealthier than royalty to be sure. Why did they not suffer the same fate? The French Revolution was not a result of rich vs poor you moron. It was the average French citizen rising up against their leaders, royalty. You do know about Tianemen Square yes? How about the recent Russian revolution? I did not think so. None too bright are you?
Nice monologue... Just a few mistakes in it. I have a couple of questions: 1) But you didn't answer why did French revolution started? 2) So only aristocrats were beheaded during the French revolution (remember Robespierre and Girondins)? 3) Tianemen or Tiananmen square? 4) Now that you mention it: These "recent" uprisings (Russia, China), what's their direct link to French revolution?
No one can be this stupid. With this post, you prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are a commie-pinko commie libtard.
From the beginning of the 20th century until the 1970s, the French Revolution was most commonly described as the result of the growing economic and social importance of the bourgeoisie, or middle class. The bourgeoisie, it was believed, overthrew the Old Regime because that regime had given power and privilege to other classes—the nobility and the clergy—who prevented the bourgeoisie from advancing socially and politically. Recently this interpretation has been replaced by one that relies less on social and economic factors and more on political ones. Economic recession in the 1770s may have frustrated some bourgeois in their rise to power and wealth, and rising bread prices just before the Revolution certainly increased discontent among workers and peasants. Yet it is now commonly believed that the revolutionary process started with a crisis in the French state.
By 1789 many French people had become critical of the monarchy, even though it had been largely successful in militarily defending France and in quelling domestic religious and political violence. They resented the rising and unequal taxes, the persecution of religious minorities, and government interference in their private lives. These resentments, coupled with an inefficient government and an antiquated legal system, made the government seem increasingly illegitimate to the French people. The royal court at Versailles, which had been developed to impress the French people and Europe generally, came to symbolize the waste and corruption of the entire Old Regime.
I absolutely abhor fucking morons. The entire revolution was against the monarchy. It had nothing to do with a battle between the rich and poor. Now, shut the f*ck up.
browng-08 wrote:oops.. he almost forgot his red text... nice save 'fuhrer'
I pwn a fucker, yet all that concerns you would be my text colour? I did not forget my text colour. I forgot to bold the most-important components of my source information, that you moronic liberals may better understand my obviously superior knowledge.
jiminski wrote:I would love to get involved but Iggy seems to be more than adequately tying this buffoon up in knots in his 2nd language.
Yet I clearly destroyed his position with a cleverly posted quote. Let me guess, you suck his cock on a daily basis yes? I thought as much. The mere fact anyone would suggest the French Revolution was a battle between the rich and the poor is continued liberal revisionism at its best.
Why, my dear children, did one Napoleon Bonaparte, whom I might add is clearly a hero of mine, seek to overrun all of Europe? I should no doubt be surprised by the many idiotic answers I receive to this question.
Der Fuhrer wrote: I pwn a fucker, yet all that concerns you would be my text colour? I did not forget my text colour. I forgot to bold the most-important components of my source information, that you moronic liberals may better understand my obviously superior knowledge.
How did you 'pwn' me (pwn, really? go back to counter strike, dipshit), by not understanding my post?
Der Fuhrer wrote: I pwn a fucker, yet all that concerns you would be my text colour? I did not forget my text colour. I forgot to bold the most-important components of my source information, that you moronic liberals may better understand my obviously superior knowledge.
How did you 'pwn' me (pwn, really? go back to counter strike, dipshit), by not understanding my post?
Counter Strike? WTF? No matter. Nice backpedal by the way.
) that all the people in world can be equal in all. That's why medical care was almost free there (if you don't include bribes to speed thing up
).
!!!
