Moderator: Tournament Directors

Loving the stats Agentagentcom wrote:UPDATED STATS AND GRAPH:
Round 1 had 2507
Round 2 had 2057 players, which is 82.050% of the previous round
Round 3 had 1687 players, which is 82.013% of the previous round
Round 4 had 1398 players, which is 82.869% of the previous round
Round 5 had 1147 players, which is 82.046% of the previous round
Round 6 had 932 players, which is 81.255% of the previous round
Round 7 had 776 players, which is 83.262% of the previous round
Round 8 had 642 players, which is 82.732% of the previous round
Round 9 had 543 players, which is 84.579% of the previous round
Round 10 had 450 players, which is 82.873% of the previous round
Round 11 had 385 players, which is 85.556% of the previous round
Round 12 had 325 players, which is 84.416% of the previous round
Round 13 had 274 players, which is 84.308% of the previous round
Round 14 had 226 players, which is 82.482% of the previous round
Round 15 had 193 players, which is 85.398% of the previous round
Round 16 had 166 players, which is 86.010% of the previous round
Round 17 had 142 players, which is 85.542% of the previous round
My prediction is that we will have 123 players advancing to the next round.
28-21 and 2 pending. Expecting at least one victory from the 2 pending.dapp69er wrote:Nice record I am 35-16 threw round 17 on that note though all my wins r on different maps(except one)...is there anyone else going for most wins on different maps? If so what's ur record
yadayada wrote:Any chance for bonus games this round? Not looking to add any unnecessary overhead, but if there is a chance, then it adds to the interest
30-21. As far as I can tell its 30 wins on all different maps and different opponents. Im sure someone will have 40+?Tviorr wrote:28-21 and 2 pending. Expecting at least one victory from the 2 pending.dapp69er wrote:Nice record I am 35-16 threw round 17 on that note though all my wins r on different maps(except one)...is there anyone else going for most wins on different maps? If so what's ur record
All on different maps and against different players.
If we are doing picks again, I say 121agentcom wrote:UPDATED STATS AND GRAPH:
Round 1 had 2507
Round 2 had 2057 players, which is 82.050% of the previous round
Round 3 had 1687 players, which is 82.013% of the previous round
Round 4 had 1398 players, which is 82.869% of the previous round
Round 5 had 1147 players, which is 82.046% of the previous round
Round 6 had 932 players, which is 81.255% of the previous round
Round 7 had 776 players, which is 83.262% of the previous round
Round 8 had 642 players, which is 82.732% of the previous round
Round 9 had 543 players, which is 84.579% of the previous round
Round 10 had 450 players, which is 82.873% of the previous round
Round 11 had 385 players, which is 85.556% of the previous round
Round 12 had 325 players, which is 84.416% of the previous round
Round 13 had 274 players, which is 84.308% of the previous round
Round 14 had 226 players, which is 82.482% of the previous round
Round 15 had 193 players, which is 85.398% of the previous round
Round 16 had 166 players, which is 86.010% of the previous round
Round 17 had 142 players, which is 85.542% of the previous round
My prediction is that we will have 123 players advancing to the next round.
Damn, I just threw one away today. I guess I'll have to find something else to wager.Tviorr wrote:
If we are doing picks again, I say 121I have another dodgy bell pepper that I dont need
ender516 wrote:Either check the vegetable crisper in your fridge more often, or find a new greengrocer.
We call it the vegetable rotter in our house. All too often we find rotten vegetables in there, not crisp.ender516 wrote:Either check the vegetable crisper in your fridge more often, or find a new greengrocer.
Perhaps you're not checking it "all too often" enough.patrickaa317 wrote:We call it the vegetable rotter in our house. All too often we find rotten vegetables in there, not crisp.ender516 wrote:Either check the vegetable crisper in your fridge more often, or find a new greengrocer.
