Now this is a good idea!!MrBenn wrote: You could then amend the name of the circum-caribbean bonus on the legend of the North American portion of the map to "Indies", and give it a bonus of 3 or 4?
Moderator: Cartographers
Now this is a good idea!!MrBenn wrote: You could then amend the name of the circum-caribbean bonus on the legend of the North American portion of the map to "Indies", and give it a bonus of 3 or 4?

No, MrBenn was suggesting on adding a bonus with the territories already there.natty_dread wrote:Are you suggesting adding a territory? Because 128 won't work with 4 player games...

yeah, worth threeMarshalNey wrote:Elegant, thematic touch- I like it. Are you going to make the Indies a single bonus?
Well.. the term "First Nations" itself bespeaks of Aboriginal sovereign assertions under the Canadian settler state, a distinctly post-contact development. Your point is well taken, however, as Tisha has carefully deployed indigenous signifiers on both maps, a project I suspect directly relates to the title of the map itself. Curiously enough however, as the map does gesture towards a Pre-Columbian past (not entirely, though, since we have the Seminoles), it seem peculiar that the cartographer chose an image with a Native on a horse.laughingcavalier wrote:Looking good.
I think if the islands on the southern map sheet were the same colour as the northern islands, it wouldn't matter that they are on a different sheet, in fact it might help to make the two sheets look more together.
I'm also not sure you want to change the bonus name to "indies" - one of the strengths of this map is it draws on pre-colonial days & the more colonial language you put in the less it is "first nations."
And "Circum-Caribbean" works well with the region name "Carib" as part of that bonus.

That's a good point actually, I can't believe I missed that too. Yeah, Tisha, as far as I know horses were introduced by European settlers. Still... I liked the picture, sigh.ghirrindin wrote:Curiously enough however, as the map does gesture towards a Pre-Columbian past (not entirely, though, since we have the Seminoles), it seem peculiar that the cartographer chose an image with a Native on a horse.
reintroducedMarshalNey wrote:That's a good point actually, I can't believe I missed that too. Yeah, Tisha, as far as I know horses were introduced by European settlers. Still... I liked the picture, sigh.ghirrindin wrote:Curiously enough however, as the map does gesture towards a Pre-Columbian past (not entirely, though, since we have the Seminoles), it seem peculiar that the cartographer chose an image with a Native on a horse.
Marshal Ney
Yeah, but isn't that fine, since there are European style ships on the map as well? Ones named after European ships hat discovered the America's. It seems as if this map is of a 1500's time period. Like the first nations as they were discovered by the Europeans. Horses could have been introduced by this point.MarshalNey wrote:That's a good point actually, I can't believe I missed that too. Yeah, Tisha, as far as I know horses were introduced by European settlers. Still... I liked the picture, sigh.ghirrindin wrote:Curiously enough however, as the map does gesture towards a Pre-Columbian past (not entirely, though, since we have the Seminoles), it seem peculiar that the cartographer chose an image with a Native on a horse.
Marshal Ney

This is my sentiment exactly.natty_dread wrote:IMO, since you have the ships on the map, you can just as well have the horse and the gun.
well, I photoshopped the gun out. we can do with the horse?The Bison King wrote:This is my sentiment exactly.natty_dread wrote:IMO, since you have the ships on the map, you can just as well have the horse and the gun.