I'm also in.

Phobia wrote:

HighBorn wrote:its not a clan group anymore.. it is now a message board for very special long standing members...lol

im not that long standing...lol

By the way: No smiley? What is wrong?

The Tunisia-Libya-connection should have been made a LITTLE bit clearer in my opinion.
Took me by surprise the first time i had to realize it.

It's cool.
Especially in team-games, there are more possibilties and strategies.

Moreover, the names of the states are very interested. My favorite is "Not Mexico".

if this would be right and he/they tried to be funny, it would be kind of an illiterate-joke because according to him/them, it's not london but lonndon

38 (now)

i don't think they are multis:
just look at the games 44063, 42938, 36659.

no multis would fight and behave like that.

i also think your pieces of circumstancial evidences aren't strong enough even to mark their names with this accusation.

I think it's a good idea to make the status to a reachable one.

If we have "too many" generals, it's possible to introduce a new rank which can be reached by getting 4000 points.

This seems to be the most gripping way in my opinion.


"This is getting embarassing. If I had passed every test ...

Scarus wrote:I took many years of French and German in college, yet I could not express myself in those languages anywhere neary as well as you do in English....

Tatsächlich? Das ist aber schade.

*calculates again*
mmmh. yes you are right. i seem to have miscalculated .
sorry for that .

HighBorn wrote:Kill the guy thats not your color thats all i know

I am not sure, but i doubt that this tactic (strategy) will earn you the first place in the tournament: "player one would wish to play with in double- or tripple- games".

When you attack 3 dice vs 1 (i.e. when you have 4 or more troops attacking 1 single troop), you should expect to win 66% of the time (don't ask me how i got this lol). e.g. 100 wins and 30 loses. 100/30 = 3.33


don't call my a stupid know-it-all, but is the winning percentage not 72,6 ...

I am not completly sure about it, but i would say this is the 209321. thread about this item (although it is to commit that this is one of the most sensible and logical and least aggressive threads).

I don't think that you are alone with your suggestion neither that everybody is agreeing with ...

I am also new around here so please forgive me if the things i write are stupid but i think that the disadvantages of a missing turn at least match the advantages:
1. Let's say you miss a turn having 12 territories. In a normal case, you are loosing 1 of them or more in your enemies turn.
You then ...

Someone who has not even begin to take his turn.

Hi i am a newbie and have a question (which, i hope, is fitting in this part of the forum):
If a player has run out of time, the others have the possibility to "force the turn".
Is there a general agreement about when to force?
Should I first wait a couple of hours or send a message to the late ...