Good for you, some of us have lives that mean we cant always be at the computer when we need to be. The way it is at the moment is the fairest it can be tbh.

Concise description:

Make a minimum of points that can be taken from a losing player


Specifics:

Currently, if you have a high rank and beat someone with a rank of >500 toy get around 2-3 points. If you lose you would lose 100 points. Fair enough you should beat that person much more often ...

I've sick of playing 1v1s with <1000 . What's the point of even playing? I win I get 10-12 points, i lose I lose 4 times as much. Why can't I filter these out when I make a game?

Try being a colonel. We get about 5 points for beating a <1000 and lose 70 if we lose to them.

I lost 4 games to ...

Sequential for casual games and FS for speed.

Attitude, nobody likes a twat

BadMoonRising wrote:When do you find time to bathe and meet women?

Or isCC is your mistress?

Have you never gone into a bar and used the line

"Hey im a Brigadier and have 20 medals, want to suck my wiener?"

Works a treat!

and it looks nice under my name
cant believe you dropped over 1000 points just to get an assassin medal
1,500 points. and it was for assassin and speed. another 100 games or so and I get gold in both. that will give me 25 medals with only the silver/gold to go for quads but those games take ...

I disagree, just because 1 or 2 people abuse the system, that doesnt make it bad, or make something else better. Both systems have their merits.

Why does it matter if I have a premium account? Is it just so you know that premium people are going to play better (or quicker)? I'm sure there are plenty of folks that paid the 25 bucks and still aren't that active.
What's up? Why are we doing all this talking. Let's get on a game!

So you can ...

Hmm, not a bad suggestion IMO. I think possibly it would be better to have 2 ratings though, the current one, and a note of what you have left other people, something like

3.4/4.1 for example, with the former being average ratings recieved and the latter ratings given.

Change your password to something random and never tell anybody.

Or if you're never going to use it, just let them use it, not like its a big deal if you dont care anymore.

yeti_c wrote:Hold CTRL and then Click.

C.

Has nobody else seen this post, its the easiest solutuin by far.

If the 1st player is smart, he will always be able to keep going 1st, especially in 24hr games, and even in 5min games to an extent.

And I have never been told by someone with half my points that I am not that good...

Change it and it becomes a sequential game with the last to join the 1st to go. If you want it like that then just play sequential.

Accused:

&sdot;&nbsp; siutiapik
&sdot;&nbsp; jayko08
&sdot;&nbsp; jayko71


The accused are suspected of:

&sdot;&nbsp;Being Multis

Comments:
They are doubles partners (siutiapik and jayko08), both from canada and have played 5 singles games all of which were won by siutiapik. Not ...

Maybe start your own speed games...

Because you play people of a lower rank. If you beat me in a game you'd win about 40 points (and I'd lose 40).

To work out how many points you will win/lose do:

(losers score/winners score)x20

I'd love to see Greece make it 2 in a row.

I think maybe having a cap of 50 points lost in a game would be a good idea.

I've been voicing my opinion plenty in the suggestions forum, but I'll put this here as well:
In a freestyle game it doesn't matter in which order players take their turns. Players can even play simultaneously! After the last player takes his turn, a new round begins immediately. The player who ...

If this suggestion was implemented it would likely turn the game into a sequential game with whoever joined last going 1st, which isn't fair either.
It wouldn't turn the game into sequential because you can still take your turn at the same time as your opponent. Or if your opponent isn't around ...

Just leave a negative or something.

If this suggestion was implemented it would likely turn the game into a sequential game with whoever joined last going 1st, which isn't fair either. This would hold very true in casual games especially as the player who goes 1st can chose a tme when their opponants are offline to start and end their ...

I agree totally, I can't handle more than 1 speed game at a time (albeit freestyle) and when I am playing someone that has more than 1 going they usually get owned because they arent paying attention.

I'd say a limit of 5 speed games at a time is perfectly enough for anyone, especially if they are ...

I'll take you on, 1 vs 1 Feudal seq no cards unlim forts foggy. I'll set em up and PM the PW.