Dealing with suicide players
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
-
Iron Butterfly
- Posts: 2711
- Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 2:10 pm
- Location: New York City
So what most are saying is that if one has nothing to lose they can not attack?
If I have built up armies I have a right to attack as I see fit. With the logic folks have been puttting forth it seems that some beleive that one can only attack if they have a chance to win. If not one should sit on their arse and let the bigger boys play.
If I am beaten up by blue player all game and he becomes dominant, you can gaurantee that if by attacking him I can ruin his chances of winning I will do so.
Its part of the game. This notion that one must sit back and meekly roll over because of bad dice and politics is stupid.
In the end this is a game..and this is part of the RISK of the game.
If I have built up armies I have a right to attack as I see fit. With the logic folks have been puttting forth it seems that some beleive that one can only attack if they have a chance to win. If not one should sit on their arse and let the bigger boys play.
If I am beaten up by blue player all game and he becomes dominant, you can gaurantee that if by attacking him I can ruin his chances of winning I will do so.
Its part of the game. This notion that one must sit back and meekly roll over because of bad dice and politics is stupid.
In the end this is a game..and this is part of the RISK of the game.