Moderator: Community Team
Fruitcake wrote:Jeeze, in my Company, if a senior Manager screwed up big time and brought me to the edge (it could not happen, I am too much of a control freak for that), he could expect these words as a reference “If he has applied for a job with you guys, do yourselves a favour, bin that CV”
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
Dancing Mustard wrote:Fruitcake wrote:Jeeze, in my Company, if a senior Manager screwed up big time and brought me to the edge (it could not happen, I am too much of a control freak for that), he could expect these words as a reference “If he has applied for a job with you guys, do yourselves a favour, bin that CV”
He'd proably sue you for negligence and try to reap loss of future earnings from you...
Fucking liberty I know, but that's the joy of UK tort law for you.
Fruitcake wrote:LOL..I love your style DM, very nice.Dancing Mustard wrote:Fruitcake wrote:Jeeze, in my Company, if a senior Manager screwed up big time and brought me to the edge (it could not happen, I am too much of a control freak for that), he could expect these words as a reference “If he has applied for a job with you guys, do yourselves a favour, bin that CV”
He'd proably sue you for negligence and try to reap loss of future earnings from you...
Fucking liberty I know, but that's the joy of UK tort law for you.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
Dancing Mustard wrote:Fruitcake wrote:LOL..I love your style DM, very nice.Dancing Mustard wrote:Fruitcake wrote:Jeeze, in my Company, if a senior Manager screwed up big time and brought me to the edge (it could not happen, I am too much of a control freak for that), he could expect these words as a reference “If he has applied for a job with you guys, do yourselves a favour, bin that CV”
He'd proably sue you for negligence and try to reap loss of future earnings from you...
Fucking liberty I know, but that's the joy of UK tort law for you.
Heh, I only wish I was joking.
But seriously, that's a sustainable cause of action these days.
got tonkaed wrote:admittedly im a little too intoxicated to understand where im going to go with this but....
fruitcake....what kind of impact does the cheap buyout have on shareholders? Also one of the strategies i heard about earlier today was to allow some of the non-performing loans to stay on the books a little longer, though i understand how this can help, is it really a systemic type of change or just a stop gap measure?
greenoaks wrote:yes i know about Lehmann Brothers but Citigroup is the one we are hearing might be in trouble next.
Fruitcake wrote:Once again...any chance of a 'merger' between these two threads mods? It would cut costs, save time and resources and the shareholders would all be happy...just like they are in Bear Stearns
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:Fruitcake wrote:Once again...any chance of a 'merger' between these two threads mods? It would cut costs, save time and resources and the shareholders would all be happy...just like they are in Bear Stearns
A merger might not be in the best interest of the shareholders in this case, seeing how this thread is rather technical in nature and content, focusing on current developments in the realm of financial markets and their underlying mechanics. While the other thread deals with the political ramifications of the general situation on the secret rule of our reptilian overlords and the racism of some guy named Hal. While the topics might not be mutually exclusive, I feel that the chemistry is not going to work out to everyone's contentment, not even to the contentment of a sizeable minority.
Fruitcake wrote:MeDeFe wrote:Fruitcake wrote:Once again...any chance of a 'merger' between these two threads mods? It would cut costs, save time and resources and the shareholders would all be happy...just like they are in Bear Stearns
A merger might not be in the best interest of the shareholders in this case, seeing how this thread is rather technical in nature and content, focusing on current developments in the realm of financial markets and their underlying mechanics. While the other thread deals with the political ramifications of the general situation on the secret rule of our reptilian overlords and the racism of some guy named Hal. While the topics might not be mutually exclusive, I feel that the chemistry is not going to work out to everyone's contentment, not even to the contentment of a sizeable minority.
Actually I mean this thread and the thread titled 'Nightmare on Wall Street'
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
khazalid wrote:got a cracker for you guys:
In thee have they taken gifts to shed blood; thou hast taken interest and increase, and thou hast greedily gained of thy neighbours by oppression, and hast forgotten Me, saith the Lord GOD. (Ezekiel 22:12)
khazalid wrote:interesting post fc. the markets are beautiful things in a lot of ways but i'd never be able to wear it like you do. all great Neptune's ocean wash these hands &c. you never wake up with a sense of profound remorse?