[GP] Increase to 12 Players

Mr_Adams · Post by **Mr_Adams** » Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:02 pm

suggestion: 9 player option

Just so that I can be the one who started this thread...

Russianfire8371 · Post by **Russianfire8371** » Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:07 pm

no. nine's too much.

Mr_Adams · Post by **Mr_Adams** » Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:10 pm

well obviosly it'd be stupid for a free for all, but it would essentialy be the same a a 3 player game, with 3 minds playing each part. would be best for world 2.1 and the likes...

Russianfire8371 · Post by **Russianfire8371** » Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:15 pm

Mr_Adams wrote:well obviosly it'd be stupid for a free for all, but it would essentialy be the same a a 3 player game, with 3 minds playing each part. would be best for world 2.1 and the likes...

well ok let me restart.

Its a good idea, though we're just pushing the limit on number of people per game. People can then argue for quintuples or 5 double team games. I also don't think that the time it would take to play a game would be appealing. i started a sequential 8 player game 3 or 4 days ago and it wasn't until late yesterday when i was able to take my first turn.

Theory's good, but i don't think it'll be popular among the fanbase

soundout9 · Post by **soundout9** » Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:17 pm

um no dude we just got a update be happy with that. you want and want and want but what do you give? lol

Next you'll suggest 10 player games and 11 then 12 then 13 and so on.

Russianfire8371 · Post by **Russianfire8371** » Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:19 pm

soundout9 wrote:um no dude we just got a update be happy with that. you want and want and want but what do you give? lol

Next you'll suggest 10 player games and 11 then 12 then 13 and so on.

You could give some money and become a member

-thumbs up-

soundout9 · Post by **soundout9** » Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:21 pm

Russianfire8371 wrote:
soundout9 wrote:um no dude we just got a update be happy with that. you want and want and want but what do you give? lol

Next you'll suggest 10 player games and 11 then 12 then 13 and so on.

You could give some money and become a member -thumbs up-

I ment that post towards mr adams

Russianfire8371 · Post by **Russianfire8371** » Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:53 pm

soundout9 wrote:
Russianfire8371 wrote:
soundout9 wrote:um no dude we just got a update be happy with that. you want and want and want but what do you give? lol

Next you'll suggest 10 player games and 11 then 12 then 13 and so on.

You could give some money and become a member -thumbs up-
I ment that post towards mr adams

my reply was towards Mr. Adams :wink:

soundout9 · Post by **soundout9** » Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:56 pm

Russianfire8371 wrote:
soundout9 wrote:
Russianfire8371 wrote:
soundout9 wrote:um no dude we just got a update be happy with that. you want and want and want but what do you give? lol

Next you'll suggest 10 player games and 11 then 12 then 13 and so on.

You could give some money and become a member -thumbs up-
I ment that post towards mr adams

my reply was towards Mr. Adams

I know...and so was mine..

Mr_Adams · Post by **Mr_Adams** » Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:58 pm

hey, it was just a thought thrown out for discussion... I don't play teams OR games with more than 4 players (most the time, I do want to try a quad game though...) I don't want, it was just an idea.

I will no longer be using this thread, so you don't need to direct posts at me.

Rainman23 · Post by **Rainman23** » Fri Dec 21, 2007 8:36 pm

I like the idea of 3 vs 3 vs 3

hwhrhett · Post by **hwhrhett** » Fri Dec 21, 2007 9:37 pm

3 vs 3 vs 3 would be wicked, but...... i dont see that happening for some time.... we must appreciate the piece of pie we've been given, because if we eat the whole pie all at once, we wont have an opportunity to cherish every single god damn bite :-)

lackattack · Post by **lackattack** » Sat Dec 22, 2007 11:30 am

The problem with more players is that the colours get more confusing.

Joodoo · Post by **Joodoo** » Sun May 25, 2008 3:29 am

It has been sugested it would it take a bunch of coding to do.

Concise description:

add a couple more options to the max # of players allowed

Specifics:

I'd like to see 12 and it works with all the current game types, 12 singles, 6 doubles teams, 4 triples teams, 3 quad teams.
increments would be fine.
9
10
send me money
Here's 12 distinct colours with different letters for "add color codes"
red r
green g
blue b
yellow y
pink p
cyan c
orange o
silver s
maroon m
lime l
violet v
drab d

This will improve the following aspects of the site:

Thezzaruz · Post by **Thezzaruz** » Sun May 25, 2008 9:13 am

I think one of the new maps (New World) has 9 starting positions so 9 players might be good for that one. Can't see it working for the smaller maps though.

Joodoo · Post by **Joodoo** » Sun May 25, 2008 9:42 am

true, especially for doodle earth
but I guess for most maps it's still okay

max is gr8 · Post by **max is gr8** » Sun May 25, 2008 9:55 am

Doodle Earth with 9 players wouldbe 2 players each
Doodle Earth with 10 players 1 territory each and 8 nuetrals cool.
But you have got to keep in minf the age of might maps have 8 starting places.

jnd94 · Post by **jnd94** » Sun May 25, 2008 10:35 am

max is gr8 wrote:Doodle Earth with 9 players wouldbe 2 players each
Doodle Earth with 10 players 1 territory each and 8 nuetrals cool.
But you have got to keep in minf the age of might maps have 8 starting places.

6.......

westsidekilla6 · Post by **westsidekilla6** » Sun May 25, 2008 11:47 am

jnd94 wrote:
max is gr8 wrote:Doodle Earth with 9 players wouldbe 2 players each
Doodle Earth with 10 players 1 territory each and 8 nuetrals cool.
But you have got to keep in minf the age of might maps have 8 starting places.

6.......

AOR 3 has 7......

Simon Viavant · Post by **Simon Viavant** » Sun May 25, 2008 1:56 pm

I'd like 9 player games so you could have free triples.

Simon Viavant · Post by **Simon Viavant** » Sun May 25, 2008 1:57 pm

I'd like 9 player games so you could have three triples.

AndyDufresne · Post by **AndyDufresne** » Sun May 25, 2008 2:22 pm

Before you could even consider this, you'd have to find color codes that are unique and different enough from the current ones we have.

I'm also afraid that 9 and 10 player games...on maps, would be simply be down to the luck of who gets to go first.

--Andy

InkL0sed · Post by **InkL0sed** » Sun May 25, 2008 2:25 pm

I've often wondered why we didn't have 9 player games when we expanded to 7 and 8, to allow three triples teams...

I think 10 player games would be pushing it though.

jnd94 · Post by **jnd94** » Sun May 25, 2008 4:47 pm

westsidekilla6 wrote:
jnd94 wrote:
max is gr8 wrote:Doodle Earth with 9 players wouldbe 2 players each
Doodle Earth with 10 players 1 territory each and 8 nuetrals cool.
But you have got to keep in minf the age of might maps have 8 starting places.

6.......

AOR 3 has 7......

But he said age of might......

ParadiceCity9 · Post by **ParadiceCity9** » Sun May 25, 2008 7:39 pm

jnd94 wrote:
westsidekilla6 wrote:
jnd94 wrote:
max is gr8 wrote:Doodle Earth with 9 players wouldbe 2 players each
Doodle Earth with 10 players 1 territory each and 8 nuetrals cool.
But you have got to keep in minf the age of might maps have 8 starting places.

6.......

AOR 3 has 7......

But he said age of might......

.......

[GP] Increase to 12 Players

What should the final proposal be?

[GP] Increase to 12 Players

Increase to 12 players. [Poll added - JoshyBoy][Submitted]

Re: 9 and 10 player games

Re: 9 and 10 player games

Re: 9 and 10 player games

Re: 9 and 10 player games

Re: 9 and 10 player games

Re: 9 and 10 player games

Re: 9 and 10 player games

Re: 9 and 10 player games

Re: 9 and 10 player games

Re: 9 and 10 player games

Re: 9 and 10 player games