Moderator: Cartographers
Now that we have the news feed on the Home Page, we can post when Round 2 starts...to see if we get any stray votes.oaktown wrote:sure, but with all my multis 15 of those votes are mine, so technically we're still in the 80s.InkL0sed wrote:There are 100 votes cast.![]()
100 is pretty good for a foundry vote, but i wonder how many votes this would get if it was in GD? It'd be nice if the second round could reach a larger audience.

I think that WM has already done that?oaktown wrote:i did a bit of work to my map, and I'm not sure if I've overdone it or not - is it bad form to post an image and ask for feedback at this stage?

Agreed - post away.oaktown wrote:i did a bit of work to my map, and I'm not sure if I've overdone it or not - is it bad form to post an image and ask for feedback at this stage?

I don't vote for Rule violators.oaktown wrote:i did a bit of work to my map, and I'm not sure if I've overdone it or not - is it bad form to post an image and ask for feedback at this stage?




I kind of did also, but some heavy hitters didn't.Kaplowitz wrote:I love the old title RJ....

Tried.. But doesn't look good.edbeard wrote:rj, you could put the title on top of the flag perhaps?

You mean this issue?edbeard wrote:
G:
1. the colours of the continents make the impassable lines look strange and different depending on where they are located. eg: yellow vs grey or light blue vs red. maybe have an outer shadow or stroke to make it uniform



The small map will require a bit of work... I'm not worried about the army circles as I've got more space to work with than marv's original, but I may have to crank up the point size of the font a bit across the map to make everything readable in small. The hardest text to read are the atlas entries, which aren't important to gameplay anyway.yeti_c wrote:Much better Oak - bit worried about your small map.
