happy2seeyou wrote:The last one is not even over yet and no end in sight.
I'm waiting for everyone else to deadbeat
GL with that.... Instant General..
BTW I think battle royale games should have a special preset point total for the winner.... This battle royale is going to be worth 3000 points or so? I do not think any one game should be worth that many points. I am sure there is a way to trick the system into a preset point total. Hell if they can make flat rate vs escalating, they can do the same with points from these games. Cap them. Just a thought..
happy2seeyou wrote:The last one is not even over yet and no end in sight.
I'm waiting for everyone else to deadbeat
GL with that.... Instant General..
BTW I think battle royale games should have a special preset point total for the winner.... This battle royale is going to be worth 3000 points or so? I do not think any one game should be worth that many points. I am sure there is a way to trick the system into a preset point total. Hell if they can make flat rate vs escalating, they can do the same with points from these games. Cap them. Just a thought..
would you be saying this if you were one of the finalists? j/kj/k
I like the battle royal... granted ive never been in one >.< but i think the points are fine, you will likelly return to your normal point later
Natewolfman wrote:would you be saying this if you were one of the finalists? j/kj/k
I like the battle royal... granted ive never been in one >.< but i think the points are fine, you will likelly return to your normal point later
Yes I would be saying that. Say James Vasquez wins.. He is about 2600 add 3K makes him our new conquer, with one game...
Gillian Wins 1900 + 3K = 4900 puts him well into the top 10... Not saying either one of these guys do not deserve to be up there, but I think 3000 points for any game is a bit much. .. What if one of the current top 10 were to win. (I think they are all out at last check) but if one was to win and walk away with 2500 points (takes point score into account) that would put someone at close to 7K or above. I think you get the point...
The scoring system on this site is one of the reasons why Battle Royales are even possible. If someone gets to be Conqueror for a week, then good for them. They will eventually return to somewhere near their previous point total. And I agree with Nate: people will only criticize Battle Royales until they have a chance of winning the jackpot themselves. It's all a matter of perspective.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
[game]1000001[/game] turn off bob before entering.
147 *manimal 2586 1081 435 (40%) Colonel Colonel 4.1 United States United States ‹zsp› y is wicked not a mod? ‹blakebowling› because Twill is an egotistical asshole
john9blue wrote:The scoring system on this site is one of the reasons why Battle Royales are even possible. If someone gets to be Conqueror for a week, then good for them. They will eventually return to somewhere near their previous point total. And I agree with Nate: people will only criticize Battle Royales until they have a chance of winning the jackpot themselves. It's all a matter of perspective.
If it was down to the final 2 and I was won of them, I would say the exact same..
happy2seeyou wrote:The last one is not even over yet and no end in sight.
I'm waiting for everyone else to deadbeat
GL with that.... Instant General..
BTW I think battle royale games should have a special preset point total for the winner.... This battle royale is going to be worth 3000 points or so? I do not think any one game should be worth that many points. I am sure there is a way to trick the system into a preset point total. Hell if they can make flat rate vs escalating, they can do the same with points from these games. Cap them. Just a thought..
I suggested something like this quite some time ago, with no official response (tho my timing turned out to be lousy, as I posted it a day before the big forum upgrade):
OliverFA wrote:That would be easily solved if the game was Terminator
no, in battle royal everyone starts with what, 1 or 2 contries? so everyone will try and hit the high ranks as fast as they can for those cheap early points... the point of battle royal is to survive the longest to win, not get early cheap points