joecoolfrog wrote:Pedronicus wrote:there should of been an option for voting for: 'understanding irony'
There would have been but dear old Brooksie couldn't spell it
Alright, you're not exactly Bernard Pivot mate.
Moderator: Community Team
joecoolfrog wrote:Pedronicus wrote:there should of been an option for voting for: 'understanding irony'
There would have been but dear old Brooksie couldn't spell it
btownmeggy wrote:Manners.
Duh.
InkL0sed wrote:btownmeggy wrote:Manners.
Duh.
Hi meggy!
PLAYER57832 wrote:TheProwler wrote:Debating.
Has anyone here ever changed his opinion on any issue? It happens all too infrequently.
If you enter a debate without keeping an open mind and being willing to listen to the other side, the debate will suffer. As will you.
All of what you said is basically true, but the real question is can we change it. To that, we MUST say "yes, we can" ...even if it is only one person. To say otherwise is to say that change is impossible ...and that is just not acceptable.
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
TheProwler wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:TheProwler wrote:Debating.
Has anyone here ever changed his opinion on any issue? It happens all too infrequently.
If you enter a debate without keeping an open mind and being willing to listen to the other side, the debate will suffer. As will you.
All of what you said is basically true, but the real question is can we change it. To that, we MUST say "yes, we can" ...even if it is only one person. To say otherwise is to say that change is impossible ...and that is just not acceptable.
I'm not so sure we have the ability to affect anyone that way...
How do you get someone to examine themselves and realize that maybe they are not being mature or confident or humble or <whatever it is> enough to accept the fact that they might be wrong about something?
I'm not saying it is impossible....but it might be given the target audience.