Moderator: Cartographers
The finalists have two weeks to tweak the map. These issues of color saturation, border visibility and font legibility can all be addressed and looked at.the.killing.44 wrote:I like #3 but as many times said before it's just too much on the eyes IMO. It's hard to read the territory names, the territories themselves seem very squished and the texture is a lot to behold. I absolutely love the title, though.

I agree. There should be updates allowed. Then as the maps change, people can adjust their votes. Just 1 update per day per map. It would allow for feedback to really be used and to see which map makers can take the input and apply it quickly and properly.edbeard wrote:what you've just stated makes the case for everyone being able to make changes
"the changes made before the final round of voting made a significant difference in the outcome"
HEEELLLLOOOO!
/thoughts on this

I agree, too. With some editing my vote can easily change to #3.WidowMakers wrote:I agree. There should be updates allowed. Then as the maps change, people can adjust their votes. Just 1 update per day per map. It would allow for feedback to really be used and to see which map makers can take the input and apply it quickly and properly.edbeard wrote:what you've just stated makes the case for everyone being able to make changes
"the changes made before the final round of voting made a significant difference in the outcome"
HEEELLLLOOOO!
/thoughts on this
WM
December 18the.killing.44 wrote:0 votes for #1 … ouch.
Sorry if this has been posted already, but when does voting end?
Thanks.samuelc812 wrote:December 18the.killing.44 wrote:0 votes for #1 … ouch.
Sorry if this has been posted already, but when does voting end?
Interesting idea to allow updates mid-vote... why couldn't somebody have brought this up a few days ago?WidowMakers wrote:I agree. There should be updates allowed. Then as the maps change, people can adjust their votes. Just 1 update per day per map. It would allow for feedback to really be used and to see which map makers can take the input and apply it quickly and properly.
I disagree that mid-vote updates are a good idea. This is an awkward time of year (at least in the US and I would imagine much of Europe) to be giving potential advantage to a cartographer with few day-to-day commitments over people who have finals, holiday parties, and various other types of Shit Going On Around This Time Of Year.oaktown wrote:Interesting idea to allow updates mid-vote... why couldn't somebody have brought this up a few days ago?WidowMakers wrote:I agree. There should be updates allowed. Then as the maps change, people can adjust their votes. Just 1 update per day per map. It would allow for feedback to really be used and to see which map makers can take the input and apply it quickly and properly.

No idea … when I went to bed it was down by like 5 …wcaclimbing wrote:wow. where did all the #4 votes come from?
When I went to bed it was trailing way behind the others with only two votes.
Big jump...
Can the mods check sub-forums of people competing?ZeakCytho wrote:I didn't even know there were 69 regular foundry goers...and there's no announcement for this yet, so it's unlikely that random people not-foundry related voted.
