captain.crazy wrote:I think that you are mostly right. Maybe the best thing is just to be open with them and leave the decision to have sex up to them, it is their decision after all. But hopefully, with enough openness, they will include their parents in the decision so that they can get the best guidance. Its their life after all...
Well yeah that's the best to hope for. I know I could talk openly with my parents about sex and ask them everything, not that I ever had to but at least I wasn't scared to tell them I was having sex.
but I still don't think that the kids that are taught abstinence are the most likely to get pregnant. I think its the ones that fucked up their birth control either by not doing it correctly, or by neglecting it altogether. Just about everyone knows about birth control these days.
Well fucking up your birthcontrol is part of the abstinence-only problem. Kids know there is birth control, but because they were not taught how to use it properly they f*ck it up. When you teach abstinence-only kids will try to find out for themselves these things, which due to the age-old effect of warping gossip leads to kids not knowing anything about safe sex.
It's not the fact that they are taught abstinence, it's that they're taught nothing else. The ones who practice abstinence are ofcourse not the most likely to get pregnant, but the ones who don't practice it are.
It's a good thing that Obama plans to cut funding to Abstinence-only education in favor of comprehensive sex-ed with abstinence as an encouraged goal. Instead of telling kids not to have sex, they're gonna tell them that sex is no light thing and should not be just rushed in but if they are going to do it at least they'll know how to practice it safely.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1886558,00.html
http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/05/07/the-end-of-abstinence-only/
