Moderator: Community Team
With you it is easy to be consistent.HapSmo19 wrote:Well shit. I had you pulling that one out in the first three posts, as usual.
When you are you and you're the consistency of feces.mpjh wrote:With you it is easy to be consistent.
I agree. It should be an option if you wanted to.captainwalrus wrote:Whatabout working like 16 hour days with a one day weekend and burning yourself out and retiring by 40 or 35?
HapSmo19 wrote:When you are you and you're the consistency of feces.mpjh wrote:With you it is easy to be consistent.
It's great (I am such at 44 right now). Except you've got to survive the 20 years (finding a nice career field like I did definitely helps!). And while the retirement check is great, it's not that much unless you're an officer. So do it the officer route.OnlyAmbrose wrote:Giving some serious thought to 20 years in the military and retiring at 42
Air Force? Weather? Barksdale!?Woodruff wrote:I'm already retired from the military, so that check's a freebie (for what it's worth...not enough to actually retire, obviously).
However, of all the shifts I've ever worked, my preference by far was this:
12 hours per shift
3 on, 2 off, 2 on, 3 off (7 days per week)
Man, that was a great shift.
Naw...computer operations workcenter at Ramstein, Germany. Been to Barksdale, but only on short trips to train some folks there...never to stay long.Hologram wrote:Air Force? Weather? Barksdale!?Woodruff wrote:I'm already retired from the military, so that check's a freebie (for what it's worth...not enough to actually retire, obviously).
However, of all the shifts I've ever worked, my preference by far was this:
12 hours per shift
3 on, 2 off, 2 on, 3 off (7 days per week)
Man, that was a great shift.
If you don' t have kids, yes.Woodruff wrote:Naw...computer operations workcenter at Ramstein, Germany. Been to Barksdale, but only on short trips to train some folks there...never to stay long.Hologram wrote:Air Force? Weather? Barksdale!?Woodruff wrote:I'm already retired from the military, so that check's a freebie (for what it's worth...not enough to actually retire, obviously).
However, of all the shifts I've ever worked, my preference by far was this:
12 hours per shift
3 on, 2 off, 2 on, 3 off (7 days per week)
Man, that was a great shift.
I'm telling you though...you want happy people? Put them on that shift.
Why? You get lots of days off, and there's more than 12 hours in a day.PLAYER57832 wrote:If you don' t have kids, yes.Woodruff wrote:Naw...computer operations workcenter at Ramstein, Germany. Been to Barksdale, but only on short trips to train some folks there...never to stay long.Hologram wrote:Air Force? Weather? Barksdale!?Woodruff wrote:I'm already retired from the military, so that check's a freebie (for what it's worth...not enough to actually retire, obviously).
However, of all the shifts I've ever worked, my preference by far was this:
12 hours per shift
3 on, 2 off, 2 on, 3 off (7 days per week)
Man, that was a great shift.
I'm telling you though...you want happy people? Put them on that shift.
I had kids (at the time, one in high school and one in junior high). They LOVED the fact that I was free to go to school events roughly half of the week. Many types of shift-work don't allow that sort of flexibility. Not once did I have any of my troops complain that the shift didn't allow them time to do things with their kids...in fact, it was the opposite.PLAYER57832 wrote:If you don' t have kids, yes.Woodruff wrote:Naw...computer operations workcenter at Ramstein, Germany. Been to Barksdale, but only on short trips to train some folks there...never to stay long.Hologram wrote:Air Force? Weather? Barksdale!?Woodruff wrote:I'm already retired from the military, so that check's a freebie (for what it's worth...not enough to actually retire, obviously).
However, of all the shifts I've ever worked, my preference by far was this:
12 hours per shift
3 on, 2 off, 2 on, 3 off (7 days per week)
Man, that was a great shift.
I'm telling you though...you want happy people? Put them on that shift.
It takes a few years of actually working before one becomes a realist. I would venture to say that most high schoolers would expect their work years to involve working 9 to 5, having three weeks vacation, having weekends off, and making $300K a year while paying next to nothing in taxes. In fact, many college-age children (I use "children" because that's how the majority of them act) would probably assume the same thing. I have four words for them - Good luck with that.mpjh wrote:Ahhh, a realist. This crowd will have a hard time with that.
True... I was making a preemptive comment born from bitterness.mpjh wrote:If they are not lying, some of the posters here have pensions from the military. That means they are either wounded vets, or 20 lifers. So, the high school and college fog doesn't explain them.
But meetings, kids games, etc are not particularly flexible. Also, it means you basically don't see your kids for several days week and with school, etc. you won't necessarily see them more during the week.Hologram wrote:Why? You get lots of days off, and there's more than 12 hours in a day.PLAYER57832 wrote:If you don' t have kids, yes.Woodruff wrote:Naw...computer operations workcenter at Ramstein, Germany. Been to Barksdale, but only on short trips to train some folks there...never to stay long.Hologram wrote:Air Force? Weather? Barksdale!?Woodruff wrote:I'm already retired from the military, so that check's a freebie (for what it's worth...not enough to actually retire, obviously).
However, of all the shifts I've ever worked, my preference by far was this:
12 hours per shift
3 on, 2 off, 2 on, 3 off (7 days per week)
Man, that was a great shift.
I'm telling you though...you want happy people? Put them on that shift.