Moderator: Community Team
... Well, I've no problem with them listening to left-wingers, in fact I'd be upset if they didn't, but not to the exclusion of everybody else.Night Strike wrote:This is what makes you proud to be an American: http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articl ... 198/29043/. They aren't violent, they weren't called out by unions, there are even people walking around with canes. Senators and Representatives should start listening to them, not the White House or left wingers.
I looked it up on Google News, and as far as I could see, no one was covering it (I did see it on Neil Cavuto, though). The only people who seem to be covering it are the blogs.Nobunaga wrote:... Do you (anybody) think you'll see this on NBC tonight, the assault or the Union thugs slipping in the side door?
...
Ive been to protests that were denounced by the local media yeah, i went to college in a fairly conservative town. As to politicians i cannot say for certain, though I was protesting around the time when president bush made the famous "i dont listen to focus groups" comment. The point is, opposing politicians would be foolish to not denounce most protesting done on controversial issues from teh opposition. Few political issues are so slam dunk in nature that there isnt some type of contempt and especially on the hot button ones like national healthcare, taxation levels, war efforts, gay marriage and union issues, its pretty easy to see why people would denounce protestors for a variety of political aims.thegreekdog wrote:Yes, but have you been to a protest, where, afterwards, it's widely reported that the protestors are morons by not only certain media outlets, but also be politicians. I find it very fascinating that Congresspeople who have not actually read the healthcare bill will fire off on demonstrators as being uninformed or misinformed. Again, not picking sides, just saying...got tonkaed wrote:Having said that, I have never been to a protest where there werent people from the other side heckling you, flipping you off, slighting your intelligence and attacking your character for protesting. Politics, even when following the rules is a bit of a contact sport.
Actually I think it's 46% with as many approving and the rest undecided, at least from the most recent polls I've seen.Night Strike wrote:I believe that's the video where the union workers were actually let in a side, handicapped door rather than waiting in line with everybody else at the main doors. So now we have to stack the meetings with supporters even though 50% of the public disapproves of the current plans and those dissenters show up first in line? I'm glad all these protesters are going to these meetings to make sure their voices are heard. They aren't being represented by ACORN and SEIU........they're representing their own voices.Nobunaga wrote:... And here we have somebody allowing entry into the St. Louis Town Hall - but only Union members, denying entry to all the regular folks who wish to attend.
http://www.breitbart.tv/st-louis-town-h ... s-entered/
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
July 22:MeDeFe wrote:Actually I think it's 46% with as many approving and the rest undecided, at least from the most recent polls I've seen.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... are_reformThe health care reform legislation working its way through Congress has lost support over the past month. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that 44% of U.S. voters are at least somewhat in favor of the reform effort while 53% are at least somewhat opposed.
You wanna know how to get Obama? They pull a knife, you pull a gun. He sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue. That's the Chicago way! And that's how you get Obama.Night Strike wrote:It's not the conservatives who are the mobsters. During Thursday night's protests in St. Louis, a man who was selling items protesting the government was attacked by alleged SEIU or other union members who were supporting the health care proposals. Sounds like the liberals are the ones doing the mobbing.
http://patterico.com/2009/08/06/angry-m ... l-meeting/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqpfU_AC7Ls
I must be hallucinating. You can't have possibly, actually just made an attempt to incite physical violence towards the president of the USA.jsholty4690 wrote:You wanna know how to get Obama? They pull a knife, you pull a gun. He sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue. That's the Chicago way! And that's how you get Obama.
It was a joke, a bad joke at that. (I changed smile to lol to make sure no one else makes that mistake again).Timminz wrote:I must be hallucinating. You can't have possibly, actually just made an attempt to incite physical violence towards the president of the USA.jsholty4690 wrote:You wanna know how to get Obama? They pull a knife, you pull a gun. He sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue. That's the Chicago way! And that's how you get Obama.
Probably. When people get angry they become easy to manipulate. Some protesters actually have an idea of what the situation is, but a lot of them are just people generally angry.jsholty4690 wrote:I bet you if you had asked most of the anti-war protesters the same question (except rephrase about Iraq), they would have done the same, spout some nonsense that bloggers and the media had told them. They would have no solutions, just like these people. Heck, I'm against the Health Care Bill (for many reasons, one of which is transparency) and I don't know exactly what we should do.
Probably because Liberals have not done much protesting since the 70's. Though, to be honest, I object to any faction that uses these tactics.thegreekdog wrote:Why is it that when liberals protest, it's okay, but when conservatives protest it's fascist?
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id ... _article=1
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/ ... tikas.html
Talk about repression of free speech... jeez. God forbid anyone gets into a debate on this issue.
Try reading the Bill, for starters. Then contact your Congresspeople with some real alternatives or just what you would like to have happen.jsholty4690 wrote:I bet you if you had asked most of the anti-war protesters the same question (except rephrase about Iraq), they would have done the same, spout some nonsense that bloggers and the media had told them. They would have no solutions, just like these people. Heck, I'm against the Health Care Bill (for many reasons, one of which is transparency) and I don't know exactly what we should do.
Absolutely, not as a participant, but observed ---thegreekdog wrote:Yes, but have you been to a protest, where, afterwards, it's widely reported that the protestors are morons by not only certain media outlets, but also be politicians. I find it very fascinating that Congresspeople who have not actually read the healthcare bill will fire off on demonstrators as being uninformed or misinformed. Again, not picking sides, just saying...got tonkaed wrote:Having said that, I have never been to a protest where there werent people from the other side heckling you, flipping you off, slighting your intelligence and attacking your character for protesting. Politics, even when following the rules is a bit of a contact sport.
One of un-answered questions is... who are these protestors? Is this dissent actually coming from concerned grassroots groups or is it a well funded and organized campaign sponsored by HMOs, insurance corporations and drug companies?PLAYER57832 wrote:In THIS case, (health care), there are plenty of idiots on both sides. But, yes, the extreme right IS the group that has begun putting forward all sorts of idiocy ranging from claims that this bill will do away with or limit medicare, that it advocate euthenizing seniors, is putting forward socialized medicine, etc. AND they are shouting down any attempts to even talk about the bill itself, to present real information. ANYONE should ask why they lie, why they refuse debates, why they use those tactics instead of simply and truly presenting their side?
oVo wrote:One of un-answered questions is... who are these protestors? Is this dissent actually coming from concerned grassroots groups or is it a well funded and organized campaign sponsored by HMOs, insurance corporations and drug companies?PLAYER57832 wrote:In THIS case, (health care), there are plenty of idiots on both sides. But, yes, the extreme right IS the group that has begun putting forward all sorts of idiocy ranging from claims that this bill will do away with or limit medicare, that it advocate euthenizing seniors, is putting forward socialized medicine, etc. AND they are shouting down any attempts to even talk about the bill itself, to present real information. ANYONE should ask why they lie, why they refuse debates, why they use those tactics instead of simply and truly presenting their side?
SAVE THE VEGETABLE PRODUCE!!!!! IF THE CARROTS DIE, THE SQUASH WILL BE NEXT!!!!!PLAYER57832 wrote:Absolutely, not as a participant, but observed ---thegreekdog wrote:Yes, but have you been to a protest, where, afterwards, it's widely reported that the protestors are morons by not only certain media outlets, but also be politicians. I find it very fascinating that Congresspeople who have not actually read the healthcare bill will fire off on demonstrators as being uninformed or misinformed. Again, not picking sides, just saying...got tonkaed wrote:Having said that, I have never been to a protest where there werent people from the other side heckling you, flipping you off, slighting your intelligence and attacking your character for protesting. Politics, even when following the rules is a bit of a contact sport.
I have seen "prostestors" objecting to logging on the Allegheny Forest who dressed up in Carrot suits.
Old folks do like their carrots!PLAYER57832 wrote: The AARP, (American Association for Retired people, in favor of the bill) among others is now actively trying to get its people out to respond.
I think we have the beginnings of a new movement, far more important than the rest:Woodruff wrote:SAVE THE VEGETABLE PRODUCE!!!!! IF THE CARROTS DIE, THE SQUASH WILL BE NEXT!!!!!PLAYER57832 wrote:Absolutely, not as a participant, but observed ---thegreekdog wrote:Yes, but have you been to a protest, where, afterwards, it's widely reported that the protestors are morons by not only certain media outlets, but also be politicians. I find it very fascinating that Congresspeople who have not actually read the healthcare bill will fire off on demonstrators as being uninformed or misinformed. Again, not picking sides, just saying...got tonkaed wrote:Having said that, I have never been to a protest where there werent people from the other side heckling you, flipping you off, slighting your intelligence and attacking your character for protesting. Politics, even when following the rules is a bit of a contact sport.
I have seen "prostestors" objecting to logging on the Allegheny Forest who dressed up in Carrot suits.
(Though I do agree entirely with your post.)
Old folks do like their carrots!PLAYER57832 wrote: The AARP, (American Association for Retired people, in favor of the bill) among others is now actively trying to get its people out to respond.
It's not that the senators, representatives, and president and their respective supporters are arguing for their own side. It's the casual way in which they dismiss the opposition, the lack of respectful media coverage of the opposition, and the scare tactics used. And I would say that if this was an anti-war protest during the Bush administration.got tonkaed wrote:Ive been to protests that were denounced by the local media yeah, i went to college in a fairly conservative town. As to politicians i cannot say for certain, though I was protesting around the time when president bush made the famous "i dont listen to focus groups" comment. The point is, opposing politicians would be foolish to not denounce most protesting done on controversial issues from teh opposition. Few political issues are so slam dunk in nature that there isnt some type of contempt and especially on the hot button ones like national healthcare, taxation levels, war efforts, gay marriage and union issues, its pretty easy to see why people would denounce protestors for a variety of political aims.
I would like to reiteriate, anyone using physical violence should absolutly be prosecuted, theres no place for that garbage considering the right to assemble should be granted in a very widespread fashion.
I am not sure what media you are listening to, but I have been hearing plenty on BOTH sides.. maybe you need to listen to NPR.thegreekdog wrote:It's not that the senators, representatives, and president and their respective supporters are arguing for their own side. It's the casual way in which they dismiss the opposition, the lack of respectful media coverage of the opposition, and the scare tactics used. And I would say that if this was an anti-war protest during the Bush administration.got tonkaed wrote:Ive been to protests that were denounced by the local media yeah, i went to college in a fairly conservative town. As to politicians i cannot say for certain, though I was protesting around the time when president bush made the famous "i dont listen to focus groups" comment. The point is, opposing politicians would be foolish to not denounce most protesting done on controversial issues from teh opposition. Few political issues are so slam dunk in nature that there isnt some type of contempt and especially on the hot button ones like national healthcare, taxation levels, war efforts, gay marriage and union issues, its pretty easy to see why people would denounce protestors for a variety of political aims.
I would like to reiteriate, anyone using physical violence should absolutly be prosecuted, theres no place for that garbage considering the right to assemble should be granted in a very widespread fashion.