Hell: What's the Point?

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
KristenAmazon
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:52 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Hell: What's the Point?

Post by KristenAmazon »

(I realize this is long, and alot of people won't read it but since we were asking for an affirmative answer I thought I'd type up my opinion. I can't abbreviate this anymore than I have and so if it's read, fine, if not fine. Try not to ask for it to be shortened lol) If you are interested, read it, if not, don't.
Frigidus wrote:What purpose does hell serve, exactly? It is supposedly a form of cosmic punishment, but the punishment lacks context. What do we hope to correct with the existence of hell?

Let me use a more familiar parallel: prison. We do not place people in prison because they commit a crime, although that is how we often tend to characterize it. We place people in prison to insure that they do not repeat the crime again. In most cases there is a certain amount of time spent in prison before the criminal's eventual release. In that case it is hoped that the punishment will ensure that they will refrain from law-breaking in the future, and they are given a second chance. Repeat offenders usually get longer sentences because this reformation is becoming increasingly less likely. Punishment that only serves as a means of getting revenge is unjust. Hammurabi's Code and other systems of law like it are no longer in use, mainly because they were based on vengeance rather than crime prevention.

So, bringing this back to hell, what purpose does hell serve other than revenge dealt out by an angry god? Eternal torment not only won't reform "sinners", it wouldn't matter if it did. Separation from the non-"sinners" is achieved through the existence of hell, but is there not a more humane way to do it? What's the point?

Hell is often mis-interpreted to mean a very litteral "red pepper up the ass" burning inferno that you feel time and again. This often comes from the explanation of it as "the lake of fire". The truth is, Jesus refers to hell in many of his parables but the characteristics are altering. Yes there is torment and pain, but not necessarily "direct torture".

And I say unto you, That many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven. But the children of the kingdom shall be cast out into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth (Matthew 8:11-12).

The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity; And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth (Matthew 13:41-42).

So shall it be at the end of the world: the angels shall come forth, and sever the wicked from among the just, And shall cast them into the furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth (Matthew 13:49-50).


And he saith unto him, Friend, how camest thou in hither not having a wedding garment? And he was speechless. Then said the king to the servants, Bind him hand and foot, and take him away, and cast him into outer darkness; there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth (Matthew 22:12-13).

The lord of that servant shall come in a day when he looketh not for him, and in an hour that he is not aware of, And shall cut him asunder, and appoint him his portion with the hypocrites: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth (Matthew 24:50-51).

For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance: but from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath. And cast ye the unprofitable servant into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth (Matthew 25:29-30).


But he shall say, I tell you, I know you not whence ye are; depart from me, all ye workers of iniquity. There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth, when ye shall see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all the prophets, in the kingdom of God, and you yourselves thrust out (Luke 13:27-28).

***The irony found in the last verse resounds in the fact that people who referred to the prophets as loonies, fools or treacherous to the current day politics or social status will also claim the right to heaven when standing before the gates, and the resounding "weeping and gnashing of teeth" is not only due to their pain of being seperated from God, but the pain of realizing that they were told by those they mocked before hand.***

As for the others, you can see in some cases where the lake of fire is referred to as a furnace. But in most other cases, the parables deal with people that either refused an invitation or gift, someone who felt that because their master was away, they could be slack and pass off their duties with no master present to judge him, or those who have been given a gift by god and decide not to use it for his kingdom. There are those that "don't hate God" even though they choose no to follow him or devote their lives to him like they should to God.

I believe that we as a human race were created in God's image and for the purpose of spending eternity with him. If that was the purpose for our creation, then the devil's greatest victory is not to fight God physically (as he was removed from heaven when he tried) but to convince us, God's people that we don't need to accept his gift of salvation. What better way to try to rob God than to go to those God loves and created and convince them to do the 1 and only thing we could do to suffer?

God doesn't want us to suffer, he didn't create us to suffer, he created us to live abundantly in him. Consider Adam and Eve. The 1 tree that they eat from was 1 out of probably thousands of trees. Why did they have to eat out of that 1 tree? They could have eaten from a different tree every day of their life and never had to touch that tree but that is the 1 tree that Satan convinced them to eat from.

God does not stack the odds against us. God has done everything possible for us to be with him, just as God gave Adam and Eve thousands of trees to eat from. It wasn't like God gave them 2 trees and said "never eat from 1... you'll just have to wait for the other to re-grow so manage it properly!" God gave them every chance and ability to choose not to eat from that 1 tree, he did everything possible to make that tree unnecessary and pointless to them... but the devil convinced them that they could be like God if they eat from that 1 tree.

You can take a horse to water but you can't make him drink it. It's free will. God gave Adam and Eve every luxury to avoid that 1 tree and make it easy to obey him. The devil corrupted that and twisted it to make it look like God was keeping something from Adam and Eve. To this day God sent his son to die, Jesus died so that we would not have to go to hell, but still, the devil looks for that 1 way to hurt God, that 1 way to rob God and it is by convincing us that we don't need to accept what God has worked so hard to give us.

In all these cases where there is cold, bitterness, weeping and gnashing of teeth, the concept is that those who accepted are warm, entertained, looked after, cared for and enjoying the rewards of the king/Lord/Host.

As we were created in God's image, I believe that for our souls to have rejected God for eternity, to spend that eternity without him, when we were specifically created to live with him would result in our souls "naturally" being tormented for being incapable of doing that which we were created for. I believe that is the punishment of hell that is serviced. Our souls don't evaporate after we die. We were created in the image of an all-powerful creator and God. We will live forever whether it be forever with God as he intended for us... or forever without him, as we would choose to live.

To be created in the image of the all powerful creator means that our free will will affect our eternity. We can choose not to accept God. It is our right, it is our power to not live a life according to what our God desires. To live in eternity with God as we were created for. To rule and live with the heavenly hosts. To marvel and understand all the questions that today we can't answer. What a time that would be.

Or... we could live forever without the God who created us. That is the result of the line being drawn in the sand. When we choose to go against God, we choose not to live with him forever, we tell him thanks but no thanks and we prefer to go it alone. Maybe we don't hate him, maybe we don't resent him, maybe we just don't understand him or see the point, but in the end, for whatever reason, we choose not to listen to the prophets and accept him. We are not any less in his image than those who do. Whether or not I accept Jesus, I am still created in his image and will live forever. Hell is merely the absensce of God. The torment of finally understanding how short 80 years really is. The torment of understanding how vast the world really is and that first feeling of barren emptiness. Not everyone who refuses God does so on an occultic basis of hatred, they are tempted by worldly posessions, worldly entertainment, worldly activities... none of which will have any meaning in Hell or eternity. When that's all gone... All our souls have is what we were created for. To spend that eternity with God... and if we've rejected that, our souls have nothing but a burning pain, an aweful torment of emptiness, bitterness and gnashing of teeth because the 1 thing we are created for, the 1 thing that will matter in eternity, we've turned our back on.

Hell will be anywhere but God's presence. Hell's "purpose" is our free will. You don't have to believe in God. You don't have to accept him. Because others have opposed God and used their free will to choose to reject God, they have the right to live in eternity without him. So do you. Hell is that right. There is no person poking you with pichforks in hell. There is no slave-master or awe-inspiring being laughing maniacly at you in hell... Satan will be in as much pain and torment in Hell as I would be. Hell is simply a result for you, a creation in God's image, using your God-given right, power and choice to reject him and live forever without him. The pain is when we realize what it's like without him.
User avatar
got tonkaed
Posts: 5034
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:01 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: Hell: What's the Point?

Post by got tonkaed »

Ive always thought of looking at hell as not so much of a fire and brimstone and more of a great sense of loss and disconnect because of a separation from God as a rather interesting proposition. Verses aside momentarily, theres a lot to discuss in what you wrote, given that you wrote a lot.

Anytime I hear the argument that humanities purpose is to reconnect with the creator God, I am reminded of the book "Childhood's End" a quite enjoyable science fiction novel. To boil the plot down too much, humanity transcendes its current form to merge with a greater entity than itself assisted by as it were, a race of satanic looking figures. Despite the imagery, I always thought this was a much more reasonable proposition than the one offered in the reconnection stance. Granted Ive never been God, but its always seemed to make more sense if you were creating a purpose for your creation to have them continue to progress as a species until they reach the transcendent point rather than having a grace oriented hypothesis. Of course there are justifications for this a plenty theologically, but its always seemed kind of backwards as a starting point.

Still for any of this to make sense it requires this free will concept, though sense is a far trickier word than it appears. Without it, there is no reason for us to live as you suggest God wanted us to, in its abundance. Right or wrong the omnipotent God just waves the its ok card and all ends up forgiven because without free will, if we mess up our end of the bargin it isnt even really our fault to begin with. Interestingly this image situation is kind of awkward in terms of free will. We are created in the image of God, who gives us free will. Presumably God has this free will as well, because God can do anything God wants. Yet instead of choosing to accept us without condition, God imposes a condition upon us to prove something using God's free will. Of course there are justifications for this as well, but it starts to get into that whole we cant understand God territory, which I am cool with going with, but it doesnt really do a whole lot.

From your own response we could presuppose that maybe it doesnt matter to God which way we choose, after all that would probably be more in line with the idea that we are created in God's image, and God choose for us to choose using his free will. Take or leave it so to speak, I showed you the way. Yet this doesnt seem to jive in any way with this idea that God perpetually sacrifices so that humanity can accept this request. Presumably God did all of these things, and ive heard this message a few times, because God simply loves us in a way that is beyond just giving us the take it or leave it choice. So it sets up a scenario where God loves us too much to let us choose for choice's sake because we have to make a specific choice out of two options, yet once we choose wrong God is incapable of forgiving us for doing something that was ingrained in us from our very creation. Awkward.
User avatar
Frigidus
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:15 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: Hell: What's the Point?

Post by Frigidus »

KristenAmazon wrote:Hell will be anywhere but God's presence. Hell's "purpose" is our free will. You don't have to believe in God. You don't have to accept him. Because others have opposed God and used their free will to choose to reject God, they have the right to live in eternity without him. So do you. Hell is that right. There is no person poking you with pichforks in hell. There is no slave-master or awe-inspiring being laughing maniacly at you in hell... Satan will be in as much pain and torment in Hell as I would be. Hell is simply a result for you, a creation in God's image, using your God-given right, power and choice to reject him and live forever without him. The pain is when we realize what it's like without him.
Interesting. Given your definition I would have much less of an issue with the concept of hell. How do other believers feel about this?
User avatar
got tonkaed
Posts: 5034
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:01 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: Hell: What's the Point?

Post by got tonkaed »

Frigidus wrote:
KristenAmazon wrote:Hell will be anywhere but God's presence. Hell's "purpose" is our free will. You don't have to believe in God. You don't have to accept him. Because others have opposed God and used their free will to choose to reject God, they have the right to live in eternity without him. So do you. Hell is that right. There is no person poking you with pichforks in hell. There is no slave-master or awe-inspiring being laughing maniacly at you in hell... Satan will be in as much pain and torment in Hell as I would be. Hell is simply a result for you, a creation in God's image, using your God-given right, power and choice to reject him and live forever without him. The pain is when we realize what it's like without him.
Interesting. Given your definition I would have much less of an issue with the concept of hell. How do other believers feel about this?
I believe thats more of a mainline American Christian standpoint than the whole lake of fire stance.

even though shes canadian.
User avatar
Symmetry
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: Hell: What's the Point?

Post by Symmetry »

got tonkaed wrote:
Frigidus wrote:
KristenAmazon wrote:Hell will be anywhere but God's presence. Hell's "purpose" is our free will. You don't have to believe in God. You don't have to accept him. Because others have opposed God and used their free will to choose to reject God, they have the right to live in eternity without him. So do you. Hell is that right. There is no person poking you with pichforks in hell. There is no slave-master or awe-inspiring being laughing maniacly at you in hell... Satan will be in as much pain and torment in Hell as I would be. Hell is simply a result for you, a creation in God's image, using your God-given right, power and choice to reject him and live forever without him. The pain is when we realize what it's like without him.
Interesting. Given your definition I would have much less of an issue with the concept of hell. How do other believers feel about this?
I believe thats more of a mainline American Christian standpoint than the whole lake of fire stance.

even though shes canadian.
Not really- her stance is much more traditional than you think. Basically thel idea of Hell is that you will be out of God's presence. The traditional allegory is fire: Heaven is light without heat. Hell is heat without light.
User avatar
anonymus
Posts: 1579
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 10:09 am
Location: Former DDR

Re: Hell: What's the Point?

Post by anonymus »

thegreekdog wrote:As I've said, the point of every religion thread I've seen on this site is to argue one of two things:

(1) God does/does not exist.
(2) If God does exist why does he suck? (which goes to proving #1).

I think some other greek once said;

If god is omnipotent and all loving/forgiving he would be willing and able
but there is suffering so is he able but not willing making him not all loving/forgiving
or he is willing but not able = not all powerful
therefore no god..

also in my favourite childhood book it says; "if god is the kind of guy who likes to put bricks in hats, you know he is goinmg to get you somewhere somehow.." about the garden of eden and the forbidden fruit..

anon out
User avatar
anonymus
Posts: 1579
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 10:09 am
Location: Former DDR

Re: Hell: What's the Point?

Post by anonymus »

Symmetry wrote:
got tonkaed wrote:
Frigidus wrote:
KristenAmazon wrote:Hell will be anywhere but God's presence. Hell's "purpose" is our free will. You don't have to believe in God. You don't have to accept him. Because others have opposed God and used their free will to choose to reject God, they have the right to live in eternity without him. So do you. Hell is that right. There is no person poking you with pichforks in hell. There is no slave-master or awe-inspiring being laughing maniacly at you in hell... Satan will be in as much pain and torment in Hell as I would be. Hell is simply a result for you, a creation in God's image, using your God-given right, power and choice to reject him and live forever without him. The pain is when we realize what it's like without him.
Interesting. Given your definition I would have much less of an issue with the concept of hell. How do other believers feel about this?
I believe thats more of a mainline American Christian standpoint than the whole lake of fire stance.

even though shes canadian.
Not really- her stance is much more traditional than you think. Basically thel idea of Hell is that you will be out of God's presence. The traditional allegory is fire: Heaven is light without heat. Hell is heat without light.
i just came in here to see who i could hook, but actually ended up reading christian argument that seems kind of plausable and not at all jesus-freaky-you-are-wrong-i-have-god-y KristenAmazon actually impressed me there..
User avatar
got tonkaed
Posts: 5034
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:01 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: Hell: What's the Point?

Post by got tonkaed »

Symmetry wrote:
got tonkaed wrote:
Frigidus wrote:
KristenAmazon wrote:Hell will be anywhere but God's presence. Hell's "purpose" is our free will. You don't have to believe in God. You don't have to accept him. Because others have opposed God and used their free will to choose to reject God, they have the right to live in eternity without him. So do you. Hell is that right. There is no person poking you with pichforks in hell. There is no slave-master or awe-inspiring being laughing maniacly at you in hell... Satan will be in as much pain and torment in Hell as I would be. Hell is simply a result for you, a creation in God's image, using your God-given right, power and choice to reject him and live forever without him. The pain is when we realize what it's like without him.
Interesting. Given your definition I would have much less of an issue with the concept of hell. How do other believers feel about this?
I believe thats more of a mainline American Christian standpoint than the whole lake of fire stance.

even though shes canadian.


Not really- her stance is much more traditional than you think. Basically thel idea of Hell is that you will be out of God's presence. The traditional allegory is fire: Heaven is light without heat. Hell is heat without light.
I dont think the two positions more traditional and mainline are mutually exclusive. At least not without seeing where on the spectrum you are placing mainline vs traditional on American Christianity.
User avatar
thegreekdog
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Gender: Male
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Hell: What's the Point?

Post by thegreekdog »

anonymus wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:As I've said, the point of every religion thread I've seen on this site is to argue one of two things:

(1) God does/does not exist.
(2) If God does exist why does he suck? (which goes to proving #1).

I think some other greek once said;

If god is omnipotent and all loving/forgiving he would be willing and able
but there is suffering so is he able but not willing making him not all loving/forgiving
or he is willing but not able = not all powerful
therefore no god..

also in my favourite childhood book it says; "if god is the kind of guy who likes to put bricks in hats, you know he is goinmg to get you somewhere somehow.." about the garden of eden and the forbidden fruit..

anon out
Yeah that's the one. Mental masturbation. Look at how smart I am. You religous are fools. Etc.
Image
User avatar
Snorri1234
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.
Contact:

Re: Hell: What's the Point?

Post by Snorri1234 »

anonymus wrote:
also in my favourite childhood book it says; "if god is the kind of guy who likes to put bricks in hats, you know he is goinmg to get you somewhere somehow.." about the garden of eden and the forbidden fruit..

anon out

I think the correct quote is:
"Because if you're dealing with somebody who has the sort of mentality which likes leaving hats on the pavement with bricks under them you know perfectly well they won't give up. They'll get you in the end."

Preceded ofcourse by:
"Your God person puts an apple tree in the middle of a garden and says, do what you like guys, oh, but don't eat the apple. Suprise suprise, they eat it and he leaps out from behind a bush shouting 'Gotcha.' It wouldn't have made any difference if they hadn't eaten it."
"Why not?"
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
Symmetry
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: Hell: What's the Point?

Post by Symmetry »

I like William Blake's argument a lot better. Basically he asks what part of us can really be called a soul? What part of us can be considered to be a part of the infinite? He says that it's our imagination. The only part of us that we can really recognise as having no limits.

Hell is a place where nobody imagines anymore. Nothing new is created.

For Blake, the traditional image of God was ridiculous. Just a guy who gives out laws and occasionally smites some poor sod. The devil, on the other hand, is a figure of pure imagination and freedom. The churches impose laws, so they chose one model as a God, and called the other evil.

"Prisons are built out of bricks of law, brothels out of bricks of religion"

If anything resembles a fallen world, far from God, it's a world where religion demands that we halt our imaginations and conform.

Seems a better model for belief than most of the others I've seen.
User avatar
KristenAmazon
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:52 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Hell: What's the Point?

Post by KristenAmazon »

Don't get me wrong in the sense that hell is still painful. When we are created for something, to live for eternity doing something, dwelling in something and enjoying something (in this case fellowship with God) it's very appealing concept is that we will do it forever. It is our eternal gift to live and dwell with the creator.

Likewise, eternity in hell is the understanding that we will never get to see God again. The understanding that you now miss out on all that you were created for because in the light of eternity, that new car, your house, your job, your carreer, your hobbies, everything that consumed your time to keep and maintain and rejoice in kept you from realizing what God had for you. In Hell none of that matters, and as a result, you will feel so empty and barren. The likes of those who are left out in the cold due to not accepting to be part of the party.

One thing I always wondered about was family a. For me one of my greatest thoughts (outside of potentially ending up in hell myself) was how I would feel if I made it into heaven, but those I loved, my family and friends didn't. The very joy that I would feel in heaven, I would have a full understanding that my friends and family were going to miss out on it. Spending forever without those that mean so much to me when they have as much of a right to heaven as I do would bring tears to my eyes. And God even moreso.

In revelations 21:4 it is said:

And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.

I partly wonder if God will with our new bodies in heaven, remove our memories of all those who rejected him. To live forever rejoicing and ruling with God is his plan. But for me, I always wonder how I would feel regretting the loss of friends and family suffering in hell. I wonder if God will not remove from our minds the memories and worries of those who go to hell because of their rejecting of him.

In the bible, a rich man who would feed his dogs scraps before a poor beggar died at the same time as the poor beggar. When the poor beggar was being brought to heaven by angels and the Rich man was not, he was begging Abraham (whom he could see far in the distance) to quench his thirst with but a drop of water.

Abraham responded, essentially telling the rich man that he and Lazarus were reaping the just rewards of their earthly lives. He then followed saying, “Besides all this, a great chasm has been fixed, so that those who might want to pass from here to you cannot do so, and no one can cross from there to us.”

After realizing that he was destined to remain in Hades, the rich man asked Abraham to send Lazarus to warn his brothers, hoping they might avoid a similar fate.

Abraham then retorted, “They have Moses and the prophets; they should listen to them.”

Undeterred, the rich man beseeched, “If someone goes to them from the dead, they will repent.”

Abraham then steadfastly proclaims, “If they do not listen to Moses and the prophets, neither will they be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.”

I don't mean to imply that hell is not a horrible place. It is as horrible of a place as the existence of a soul created to live with God being incapable of doing so. On this earth we have to make our decision, and it applies for all of eternity. We could never earn salvation ourselves. So Jesus taking the toll of sin upon himself is the greatest injustice of all time - in our favour. Once in heaven, not on the basis of your work but rather accepting of Jesus sacrifice to counter the sin that made us unworthy God's people can't accidentally leave him or be distracted by the horrid nature of absense from him. Once in Hell, you cannot say: "Now I know better, let me take the test again."

I would be distracted by sorrow if I knew hundreds of friends that were going through such a pain in hell. God's word says we should "love one another" and we should "bless those that curse us". This is a kind of love that God calls us to that is so powerful that we need not re-demand love in exchange, we are to give it unconditionally. To love as Christ loves. And for that reason, I could not see how anyone who loves as christ loves could evade sorrow of understanding the pain of those in hell. God hates the sin, not the sinner, but the sinner rejects God. Maybe in Heaven, our souls and new bodies understand that hell is inhabited by those that rejected God. Maybe the minds of our bodies in heaven are completely wiped clean of the past evils and torments of the world as we rejoice with our creator.

I don't know all the answers now but I pray to God that I do make it into heaven and that I learn to develop a relationship with him while on this earth that results in him saying: "Well done good and faithful servant" as opposed to: "Go away,for I do not know you."

From your own response we could presuppose that maybe it doesnt matter to God which way we choose, after all that would probably be more in line with the idea that we are created in God's image, and God choose for us to choose using his free will. Take or leave it so to speak, I showed you the way. Yet this doesnt seem to jive in any way with this idea that God perpetually sacrifices so that humanity can accept this request. Presumably God did all of these things, and ive heard this message a few times, because God simply loves us in a way that is beyond just giving us the take it or leave it choice.


God has done so much to make it possible for us to choose to spend eternity with him. In Eden he only put 1 tree directly in the center and clearly pointed out what tree to avoid. Is that not more than fair?

Similarly, God gives us free will and while he can do everything in his power to make it possible for us to join him, he cannot and will not make the decision for us. You may ask: Does that make God less powerful? and the answer is no. God's power is not in forcing us to go to heaven. God's power is not in roping us all up and plucking us out of the earth to be with him. God's power was in conquering sin and making it possible for us to go to heaven if we chose. The fact that we have a part to play does not remove from God's power. "Take it or leave it" is very basically dumbed down but because of our creation in his image, that is very often what we find ourselves with. We can choose not to accept God and God will honour our choice no matter how much it hurts him. He knows it will hurt us more which is why he tries so hard to help us make the right choices, but he cannot choose for us.
User avatar
anonymus
Posts: 1579
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 10:09 am
Location: Former DDR

Re: Hell: What's the Point?

Post by anonymus »

Snorri1234 wrote:
anonymus wrote:
also in my favourite childhood book it says; "if god is the kind of guy who likes to put bricks in hats, you know he is goinmg to get you somewhere somehow.." about the garden of eden and the forbidden fruit..

anon out

I think the correct quote is:
"Because if you're dealing with somebody who has the sort of mentality which likes leaving hats on the pavement with bricks under them you know perfectly well they won't give up. They'll get you in the end."

Preceded ofcourse by:
"Your God person puts an apple tree in the middle of a garden and says, do what you like guys, oh, but don't eat the apple. Suprise suprise, they eat it and he leaps out from behind a bush shouting 'Gotcha.' It wouldn't have made any difference if they hadn't eaten it."
"Why not?"
yeah my quotes where kind of wrong, but you got the message so im happy! ;)
User avatar
got tonkaed
Posts: 5034
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:01 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: Hell: What's the Point?

Post by got tonkaed »

I think the point of the feeling of loss and suffering from it is easy to understand from the perspective. If we assume that this is the purpose of creation and the consequences are as you described, it would certainly be an incomprable letdown upon the fulfillment of all of the pieces. It still puts forward interesting questions or areas of a lack of clarity. Presumably the majority if not all of people who did not choose correctly as it were did not feel this presence of God in their lives to begin with. Of course this assumes a type of rationality that is probably frowned upon from this perspective, but it does not seem to be a huge stretch to say if humans show rational thought and behavior (at times) that if we were created in the image of a God, that this was not accidental. Therefore, to assume that what must consitute a vast majority of individuals who choose an alternative path away from God, must be God-hating or willfully avoiding the correct choice seems to be quite off.

Of course at times this is explained away by making these people antagonists pitting them as the them in the proverbial "us vs them". Given that we are all supposedly apart of the same creation and assuming one does not believe in a form of predestination (which would be somewhat interesting to say the least) it seems quite strange to create such a false dialetic. Everyone would be on the same team, all as equals going forward toward this eternity with this one great choice of consequence. Yet if this is the case, the explanation for why some people choose what must assuredly be irrational if the proposed is true, is left wanting. There must be more to it than what is proposed as to why people dont make the choice. Though thats beyond the scope of what your presenting, its not entirely unrelated.

The next few paragraphs are admittedly from my perspective a little disheartening because they show a very human reaction to a very tricky theological problem. So you attain salvation, thus fulfilling your greatest responsibility in live. What to do about job 1b) ie, making sure no one else screws it up. In all likelyhood, you cant win them all, and in all probability some of those people are going to be close to you. Surely given the stakes that would seem to be at play, there would still be a tremendous sense of loss when realizing those most important to us have suffered the opposite outcome of the truly great experience we are having.

What is a benevolent God to do? In the popular series Left Behind, he does something akin to revelations, which strikes me as inhumane (though most of that series strikes me as inhumane). Instead of giving us a mechanism to deal with it as mature adults who are one with their creator God, we are just whitewashed of ever knowing these people. Putting aside for one moment that this seems like an awful thing to do, even with benevolent intentions, what does this say about God? We are created for this one purpose of spending eternity with God, yet God is presumably always in some sort of grief because the creation God has loved so much has in part not accepted the relationship God has offered. Instead of sharing incredibly human (and presumably Godly from that image point) emotion/experience with those people who did choose correctly, God chooses to go it alone and wipe our minds clean instead? Yikes.

Putting aside the vast swaths of human history which did not have the Christian message revealed to them in time to make this choice (though there are theological justifications for that -though not all of them fit in this context) this still seems like an awfully short amount of material for such an important case. Now dont get me wrong, the bible is by no means a short book, and there is the whole living testimony business not to mention all the writings in between, but this still seems a little lacking if God really wants us to choose the right way. Its difficult to make this point without avoiding the fact that i have to make light of the fundamental issue of your faith and I apologize for this, but even the great act of sacrifice which was supposed to take care of all doubt happened 2 millenia ago (if it did). Using the somewhat non-religious, religious approach of rational choice theory, theres a lot of sellers in the market with more updated products that give the consumer some cause to pause. Again this doesnt mesh with the situation we are presented with here. I understand the weight that is applied to sending one's only son down to earth to die for humanities sins, but from a nonbelievers perspective, seeing as how the end times have been a little late in coming, it seems a little early in the day to have played that card.

In response to your response:

Truly God has done alot if Christianity is the message (notwithstanding my objection above -which again I apologize for making in the form i did, as i realize it is likely to offend) but to be fair, apparently everyone else has been doing a lot as well. I dont really feel fair enough or more than fair is really that meaningful here. Given the enormity of the situation here, what does fair really mean anyway? Why is fairness more important than the relationship we were supposedly destined to fulfill. Ive yet to see fairness extolled that high above all other virtues.

I dont really think ive been arguing from a perspective of God's power here, ive more been talking from a perspective of the failure of this image perspective to truly show what must be going on here. If God is really setting the conditions as thus, it seems incredibly inhumane. Of course it is easy to argue that God is not human and we are merely an image, but then we arent much of an image then and the image loses its value as a starting point. Without the image point of reference the whole framework for this perspective seems to lose a little balance.

Also God's power is conquering sin must be incredibly redundant. Sin at a basic level is separation from God. If we were created for the purpose of having a relationship with God, there should not really be such an empahsis placed on defeating something that was already defeated from square one. And if this goes back to the original fall, then it is a God so opposite of long-suffering that it is rather useless to postulate as such, and if God is not long-suffering it again presents problems for this perspective regarding the choice.
User avatar
jonesthecurl
Posts: 4625
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:42 am
Gender: Male
Location: disused action figure warehouse
Contact:

Re: Hell: What's the Point?

Post by jonesthecurl »

Ok, we've redefined hell.

Point 1:Now, I say again: we are supposed to choose the right god through faith. What makes those who choose differently (forget us atheists for the moment) wrong? They have faith.

Point 2:Faith, but it's wrong?
Then how does one know one's own faith is right? Faith? - see point 1.
instagram.com/garethjohnjoneswrites
User avatar
xelabale
Posts: 452
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 8:12 am

Re: Hell: What's the Point?

Post by xelabale »

Would you prefer Hell or High Water?
hahaha3hahaha
Posts: 715
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:30 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Hell: What's the Point?

Post by hahaha3hahaha »

-deleted-
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”