Moderator: Cartographers

drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
I'll work on these and see. The backgrounds on the bonuses some of them if I get to light you won't see them, or they get washed out, like the Canadian flag for instance. Any more and it gets washed out. It is good where it is. A few of the others could be brought down a smidge.porkenbeans wrote:The background images of the bonus areas, needs more opacity.
The black shadow on the edges, needs less opacity.
The water could be a lighter shade to help some of the text to be more clear, and bring some needed contrast to the map.
Yes it is kinda bland, but for clarity sakes I think it will stay, unless anyone has any other font ideas.jefjef wrote:New font is kinda bland.....& Industrial H.. Libertarian is the new confederacy.
Thank you!Industrial Helix wrote:Nice improvements since I've last checked. I'd like to petition for the Libertarians to be called the New Confederacy though... seems to make more sense.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
No No, just the opposite. I think they need to be more visible, -not less.isaiah40 wrote:I'll work on these and see. The backgrounds on the bonuses some of them if I get to light you won't see them, or they get washed out, like the Canadian flag for instance. Any more and it gets washed out. It is good where it is. A few of the others could be brought down a smidge.porkenbeans wrote:The background images of the bonus areas, needs more opacity.
The black shadow on the edges, needs less opacity.
The water could be a lighter shade to help some of the text to be more clear, and bring some needed contrast to the map.
Yes it is kinda bland, but for clarity sakes I think it will stay, unless anyone has any other font ideas.jefjef wrote:New font is kinda bland.....& Industrial H.. Libertarian is the new confederacy.
Thank you!Industrial Helix wrote:Nice improvements since I've last checked. I'd like to petition for the Libertarians to be called the New Confederacy though... seems to make more sense.Taken and noted! Any others like this idea? Let me know!
I'll get the next version posted as soon as I can, RL stuff you know.

Well, I did post when I was tired so yes!porkenbeans wrote: No No, just the opposite. I think they need to be more visible, -not less.
I think that would make the map too messy looking... Worth a try though.porkenbeans wrote: No No, just the opposite. I think they need to be more visible, -not less.
You might be right, but I think that those images should somehow be more clear to the viewer, as some may not even see them, or know exactly what they are supposed to be.soundman wrote:I think that would make the map too messy looking... Worth a try though.porkenbeans wrote: No No, just the opposite. I think they need to be more visible, -not less.

drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
Oooops, forgot to show it!jefjef wrote:No can see Libertarian symbol.


Or Deseret. All of them are very hard to distinguish. You know what they are, but the average viewer dose not.jefjef wrote:No can see Libertarian symbol.

Isaiah forgot to put it on. That's what he's saying, not that it's too light.porkenbeans wrote:Or Deseret. All of them are very hard to distinguish. You know what they are, but the average viewer dose not.jefjef wrote:No can see Libertarian symbol.
these are good changes that add clarity.isaiah40 wrote:moved the NM border to the left and took out the panhandle of Neuvo Arizona. I alos moved the left border of Amarillo to the left as well so the text would fit better, as well as moved the Baja California/Neuvo Arizona border down a little to get rid of the four way corner.
that was excellent, to avoid amexica becoming a wasteland that is ignored in favour of the smaller bonuses. in fact, please go further by merging zacatecas into durango (both of them rather insignificant places) to reduce amexica to 11 regions and adding either la or san fran to ecovania, next to bakersfield (la looks more likely, since there's space in the western part of san diego). at 6 regions, ecovania, along with democrats, will become one of only 2 medium-sized bonus zones on the map.isaiah40 wrote:I moved San Diego from Amexica to Ecovnia. Amexica already has 13 territories so 1 less won't change the bonus.
sounds good! ecoville can start normally if ecovania has 6 regions. this means there will be 87 regions on the map, of which 7 capitals start with 3 neutrals, leaving 80 regions to be shared out randomly (a nice number for all sizes of game, whereas 79 isn't great for 8-player).isaiah40 wrote:we would have Montana, Havana, Quebec, Winnipeg, Illinois, SLC, Iowa, and I think adding in Ecoville as capitals that start with 3 neutrals.
Um, no so I redid all the Metis borders. Enlarged Winnipeg so that the text wasn't crammed in, and connected Grassland to Minnesota.iancanton wrote:is there a need for grand forks to be such a strange shape? it seems natural for grassland to be able to fort to an adjacent minnesota.
Yes it is because of the inner glow.iancanton wrote:the presence of long island makes the east coast of the usa look like the east coast, even though it seems strangely darker than new jersey.
Done, and moved Ecoville to where Bakersfield was and added Redding. Connected Los Angeles with Oasis, Baja California and Neuvo Arizona to avoid the stair-step effect.iancanton wrote:that was excellent, to avoid amexica becoming a wasteland that is ignored in favour of the smaller bonuses. in fact, please go further by merging zacatecas into durango (both of them rather insignificant places) to reduce amexica to 11 regions and adding either la or san fran to ecovania, next to bakersfield (la looks more likely, since there's space in the western part of san diego). at 6 regions, ecovania, along with democrats, will become one of only 2 medium-sized bonus zones on the map.isaiah40 wrote:I moved San Diego from Amexica to Ecovnia. Amexica already has 13 territories so 1 less won't change the bonus.
Wait, why were you in here before you joined?Alaskan Viking wrote:I joined Conquer Club after I saw this map, it looks freaking awesome! The only thing missing is Alaska.(I understand there are space issues, but still.)
First of all welcome to CC!!Alaskan Viking wrote:I joined Conquer Club after I saw this map, it looks freaking awesome! The only thing missing is Alaska.(I understand there are space issues, but still.)
The only thing I would suggest, is to break Canada in two, IMHO it is too big and drawn out. I would make Washington state, (major businesses have headquarters in Washington, Boeing, Microsoft, etc.) Alberta,(Alberta is like a Canadian Texas; very conservative, large oil sector.) British Columbia and Vancouver be an extreme Anarcho-Capitalist faction. Maybe name it "Oil Barons" or "The Corporation".
Also; I'd really like to see the South Rise again. I love the Libertarian Party, but, the map already has a libertarian faction in the form of the Gadsden flag wielding Freemens. I think the map would have even more character if the Libertarian south was changed to the Confederacy--if no one is offended, of course.
I was browsing the board-game-geek forums, and saw a thread about Conquer Club, I was intrigued so I checked out the CC forums and found this thread.captainwalrus wrote:Wait, why were you in here before you joined?Alaskan Viking wrote:I joined Conquer Club after I saw this map, it looks freaking awesome! The only thing missing is Alaska.(I understand there are space issues, but still.)
That being said, I completely agree with splitting up Canada, they aren't really any more unified than us.
It pretty much is, unless someone comes up with a really GOOD idea. I had an Extremist Islamic Faction in the earlier maps, but someone complained that (I also had a Democratic Socialist Party Faction) I was being too right wing and bigoted so this thread was locked down for about 5 days. I then changed some of the names to be more 'PC' for some people so I could move this map along. So an Islamic Faction will not be on this map. The Outfit capital is Chicago (Illinois), and that is staying.Alaskan Viking wrote:I was browsing the board-game-geek forums, and saw a thread about Conquer Club, I was intrigued so I checked out the CC forums and found this thread.captainwalrus wrote:Wait, why were you in here before you joined?Alaskan Viking wrote:I joined Conquer Club after I saw this map, it looks freaking awesome! The only thing missing is Alaska.(I understand there are space issues, but still.)
That being said, I completely agree with splitting up Canada, they aren't really any more unified than us.
Back on topic; Is the mafia faction set in stone? I think the area makes more sense as an Islamic faction than the west coast did. Dearborn Michigan could be the capital. lol
have u considered expanding winnipeg to meet the river, so that grassland becomes an internal region? lengthen the st croix river too, so that minnesota no longer borders wisconsin, to give to the metis zone a bit more protection. possibly lose the iowa-missouri arrow to let the missouri river be more of a barrier and put an extra mountain between colorado and amarillo to make it clear that these regions are not adjacent.isaiah40 wrote:Need to do:
- Get this Gp'd!