Moderator: Community Team

You're kidding right? Please tell me you are not serious. What is the difference between black and white, hot and cold, fast or slow, fat or skinny, and I could go on and on and on....pmchugh wrote:If you have eternal happyness then your mood never goes up or down. Without sadness how can you know what happyness is? Without bad there is no good is frequently said by religious people to say why bad things happen. So how is eternal happyness any better than eternal pain?
Yup but if you feel it for an infinite amount of time it is "bland".keyborn wrote:You're kidding right? Please tell me you are not serious. What is the difference between black and white, hot and cold, fast or slow, fat or skinny, and I could go on and on and on....pmchugh wrote:If you have eternal happyness then your mood never goes up or down. Without sadness how can you know what happyness is? Without bad there is no good is frequently said by religious people to say why bad things happen. So how is eternal happyness any better than eternal pain?
Pain is what you feel when you burn your hand on a hot stove...happiness is when you eat the awesome food cooked on that hot stove.
Need anymore examples?...sheesh....
I think if there is a god he loves his people. I do not think that god would create a place such a hell.pmchugh wrote:Yup but if you feel it for an infinite amount of time it is "bland".keyborn wrote:You're kidding right? Please tell me you are not serious. What is the difference between black and white, hot and cold, fast or slow, fat or skinny, and I could go on and on and on....pmchugh wrote:If you have eternal happyness then your mood never goes up or down. Without sadness how can you know what happyness is? Without bad there is no good is frequently said by religious people to say why bad things happen. So how is eternal happyness any better than eternal pain?
Pain is what you feel when you burn your hand on a hot stove...happiness is when you eat the awesome food cooked on that hot stove.
Need anymore examples?...sheesh....
If you have always had your hand on the stove how would you know that it feels bad to have your hand on it?
Army of GOD wrote:I joined this game because it's so similar to Call of Duty.
My my, that's a very lovely straw man you have there. First of all it’s happiness (a state of well-being characterized by relative permanence, by dominantly agreeable emotion ranging in value from mere contentment to deep and intense joy in living, and by a natural desire for its continuation). Second of all, all attempts to describe heaven or hell result in a straw man definition, since neither you nor I have been there.pmchugh wrote:If you have eternal happyness then your mood never goes up or down. Without sadness how can you know what happyness is? Without bad there is no good is frequently said by religious people to say why bad things happen. So how is eternal happyness any better than eternal pain?

I guess some people actually see it as that, according to this thread.2dimes wrote:Is this trolling or do people really believe the difference between a back rub and sunburn is simply perspective?
Despite what some others say, I think this is a valid question. It points out the ridiculousness of the traditional cartoon image of Heaven: sitting around on clouds with harps. Sounds awful boring to me.pmchugh wrote:If you have eternal happyness then your mood never goes up or down. Without sadness how can you know what happyness is? Without bad there is no good is frequently said by religious people to say why bad things happen. So how is eternal happyness any better than eternal pain?
I like this. Never heard it before. A good story.tzor wrote:
There is an old joke about heaven and hell. In hell everyone is seated at a table with bowls of rice in front of them, but their chopsticks are so long they can’t stretch out their arms long enough to grab the rice from their bowls, never mind bringing the rice to their lips. In heaven, everyone is seated at a table with bowls of rice in front of them and the same chopsticks but they are all happy because they all feed each other.
There is an irony in that a lot of my thoughts on heaven are based on Star Trek. Unfortunately, they never managed to combine the threads in the series itself; a pity.daddy1gringo wrote:Despite what some others say, I think this is a valid question. It points out the ridiculousness of the traditional cartoon image of Heaven: sitting around on clouds with harps. Sounds awful boring to me.

One of the times I heard it there was an addendum.PLAYER57832 wrote:I like this. Never heard it before. A good story.tzor wrote:
There is an old joke about heaven and hell. In hell everyone is seated at a table with bowls of rice in front of them, but their chopsticks are so long they can’t stretch out their arms long enough to grab the rice from their bowls, never mind bringing the rice to their lips. In heaven, everyone is seated at a table with bowls of rice in front of them and the same chopsticks but they are all happy because they all feed each other.
I don't troll. It's a serious question. Think about the difference between rich and poor people, you would expect rich people to be happier as they have a better quality of life (more back rubs anyway). However this is largely not true, because perspective does matter.2dimes wrote:Is this trolling or do people really believe the difference between a back rub and sunburn is simply perspective?
If you live for an infinite amount of time you will live out every possible event an infinite amount of times, no matter if you go linearly or jump around.tzor wrote:There is an irony in that a lot of my thoughts on heaven are based on Star Trek. Unfortunately, they never managed to combine the threads in the series itself; a pity.
Before I go there, however, I just want to make an observation. We can get confused with the scientific understanding of people thousands of years ago when we say that God is in the “heavens.” They thought the universe at the time was a sphere or dome surrounded by water. God was outside His creation, as it were. If we view the universe today as a space time continuum, then God is outside space time. There is an implication of this in terms of time itself, because what we call time is simply a dimension within our own universe. What is outside our universe is truly unknown.
There are two models of the immortal in Star Trek. The “Q” were the perfect example of the linear infinity immortality that has been our traditional vision of heaven and hell. In the end they went crazy over infinite boredom and ended their own immortality.
A model that is closer to the traditional description of God (one who just simply is) was found in the wormhole immortals. Unlike the Q who lived their own timeline (even though they traveled in time) one second at a time, the wormhole immortals fluttered back and forth in time, in an almost quantum mechanical and definitely non linear manner. Concentrating on a linear train of thought was somewhat distressing for them. They lived in the infinite random combinations of space time and were, for practical purposes, content.
Clearly the solution for the Q was not to die, but to become like the wormhole creatures; to cease linear being and simply be. Could this be like the eternity of heaven and hell? Who knows? And that’s the whole problem, isn’t it?
Does marriage count? How about dealing with the parents of student-athletes (to use the term loosely)?CreepersWiener wrote: So, the lesson here is that you must first go through HELL to ultimately get to your Heaven.
Let me clarify... For the wormhole aliens, there was no such thing as time. It did not exist for them. You look at a piece of paper. You, immediately, all at once, see everything on that piece of paper. The wormhole aliens looked at time the same way. And to go through it linearly would be to go through that piece of paper, row by row, taking each individual point as it's on and building a sense of perspective from that, like we do with time, as opposed to taking it as a whole, like the wormhole aliens did with time. So to us, yes the wormhole aliens did live for an infinite amount of time, but for them, no they didn't because time was something so different, it's hard to call it time.pmchugh wrote:If you live for an infinite amount of time you will live out every possible event an infinite amount of times, no matter if you go linearly or jump around.tzor wrote:There is an irony in that a lot of my thoughts on heaven are based on Star Trek. Unfortunately, they never managed to combine the threads in the series itself; a pity.
Before I go there, however, I just want to make an observation. We can get confused with the scientific understanding of people thousands of years ago when we say that God is in the “heavens.” They thought the universe at the time was a sphere or dome surrounded by water. God was outside His creation, as it were. If we view the universe today as a space time continuum, then God is outside space time. There is an implication of this in terms of time itself, because what we call time is simply a dimension within our own universe. What is outside our universe is truly unknown.
There are two models of the immortal in Star Trek. The “Q” were the perfect example of the linear infinity immortality that has been our traditional vision of heaven and hell. In the end they went crazy over infinite boredom and ended their own immortality.
A model that is closer to the traditional description of God (one who just simply is) was found in the wormhole immortals. Unlike the Q who lived their own timeline (even though they traveled in time) one second at a time, the wormhole immortals fluttered back and forth in time, in an almost quantum mechanical and definitely non linear manner. Concentrating on a linear train of thought was somewhat distressing for them. They lived in the infinite random combinations of space time and were, for practical purposes, content.
Clearly the solution for the Q was not to die, but to become like the wormhole creatures; to cease linear being and simply be. Could this be like the eternity of heaven and hell? Who knows? And that’s the whole problem, isn’t it?

Marriage could be heaven...but Hell and Heaven all have to deal with emotions ultimately. Hell is the perception of zero love...while heaven is the perception of all love.Woodruff wrote:Does marriage count? How about dealing with the parents of student-athletes (to use the term loosely)?CreepersWiener wrote: So, the lesson here is that you must first go through HELL to ultimately get to your Heaven.
Army of GOD wrote:I joined this game because it's so similar to Call of Duty.
Sounds like my first marriageCreepersWiener wrote:Marriage could be heaven...but Hell and Heaven all have to deal with emotions ultimately. Hell is the perception of zero love...while heaven is the perception of all love.Woodruff wrote:Does marriage count? How about dealing with the parents of student-athletes (to use the term loosely)?CreepersWiener wrote: So, the lesson here is that you must first go through HELL to ultimately get to your Heaven.
Well, that's certainly a highly-educated and infinitely well-supported response.pmchugh wrote:shut it ya cunt i am rght
Drunken fool...Woodruff wrote:Well, that's certainly a highly-educated and infinitely well-supported response.pmchugh wrote:shut it ya cunt i am rght
keyborn wrote:You're kidding right? Please tell me you are not serious. What is the difference between black and white, hot and cold, fast or slow, fat or skinny, and I could go on and on and on....pmchugh wrote:If you have eternal happyness then your mood never goes up or down. Without sadness how can you know what happyness is? Without bad there is no good is frequently said by religious people to say why bad things happen. So how is eternal happyness any better than eternal pain?
Pain is what you feel when you burn your hand on a hot stove...happiness is when you eat the awesome food cooked on that hot stove.
Need anymore examples?...sheesh....
That's not true for me. If I'm having a good day, eating some nice food being with family I just enjoy the moment. I don't think, "This is good because I had a tooth ache once and now I can understand this day.?Falkomagno wrote:keyborn wrote:You're kidding right? Please tell me you are not serious. What is the difference between black and white, hot and cold, fast or slow, fat or skinny, and I could go on and on and on....pmchugh wrote:If you have eternal happyness then your mood never goes up or down. Without sadness how can you know what happyness is? Without bad there is no good is frequently said by religious people to say why bad things happen. So how is eternal happyness any better than eternal pain?
Pain is what you feel when you burn your hand on a hot stove...happiness is when you eat the awesome food cooked on that hot stove.
Need anymore examples?...sheesh....
Actually you really miss the point. What is cold, if the only thing that exist is hot?. Without mountains there is no concept of valley. Without sadness, happiness doesn't make any sense. Jeez. Some people are just so simple.
Actually there is no such thing as cold. That is only a discription given so we can express a lack of heat.What is cold, if the only thing that exist is hot?.