Was it the dark side of the moon that got you in trouble?nippersean wrote:I got arrested for mooning once. Locked up and a fine. The moon does have a lot to answer for.
Moderator: Community Team
Was it the dark side of the moon that got you in trouble?nippersean wrote:I got arrested for mooning once. Locked up and a fine. The moon does have a lot to answer for.
b.k. barunt wrote:Then you must be a pseudoatheist. If you were a real atheist Dan Brown would make your nipples hard.
First, good luck with the impending birth!donkeymile wrote:You aren't even making sense ... what am I missing?
Is there some inside joke I'm not privy to?
what you say. listen to yourselfdonkeymile wrote: .... take your childish, boorish nonsense elsewhere ....
You clearly don't understand the definition of the word "complain".donkeymile wrote:I understand all that .. its just insane how almost everyone I play agrees that they are tired of all the lopsided bullshit games .... tonight I played 2 games .... both games my oppponent (same player) had nearly perfect dice EVERY turn while I had average to bad dice. He says to me (as he is kicking my ass twice) how he is so sick of the lopsided bullshit too ... because the games just aren't fun to play when its like that. When this happens ALL THE TIME, Iwould say there is something wrong.
I'm not complaining here
Honestly, I hate the "dice suck" threads... but I have seen this, too. When the roll lags... seriously 95% of the time it seems like it goes against me. It is probably more like 85%, but still...Lord Apophis wrote:What i have seen is that When you roll the dice... and its loading the roll, the longer the wait... the better the chances of the roll being Against you... i dont know if this is something... but id watch it and see if you see what i see...
You are absolutely right! That's exactly what I have noticed too.Lord Apophis wrote:What i have seen is that When you roll the dice... and its loading the roll, the longer the wait... the better the chances of the roll being Against you... i dont know if this is something... but id watch it and see if you see what i see...


Been around for too long...said things that shouldn't have been said...but all that has changedMr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
You have the gall to whine about the interface here and then bring up Landgrab? Landgrab is light-years behind this site as far as interface, structure and game capabilities go.War Eagle wrote:I came back to this site, and have to say that it hasn't improved for 2 years... the dice are still fucky, the interface sucks balls ~ and there are noobs and cheaters galore. I honestly don't understand why people still play this crap... I mean LANDGRAB isn't perfect, but it's 10x better than this!
You don't actually understand statistics, do you? Or perhaps, you don't understand exactly how many dice rolls happen on this site each and every day?War Eagle wrote:I mean, come on! The randomizer they use here is bullshit! The chances of that happening are practically 1:7000.
Hahaha, well...have fun with your useless site where the person who starts a game always goes first.War Eagle wrote:Hahahaha, well.... have fun with your girly little ratings and renamed cards "spoils"
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Landgrab has tons of options and a very beautiful new layout ~ CC is acutally quite limited!You have the gall to whine about the interface here and then bring up Landgrab? Landgrab is light-years behind this site as far as interface, structure and game capabilities go.
No moron, I was talking about the streakyness involved. Sure they even out after 1000 rolls, but that doesn't matter in the first crucial turns.You don't actually understand statistics, do you? Or perhaps, you don't understand exactly how many dice rolls happen on this site each and every day?
Is that right? well don't bother coming over either... we don't need any more high-minded Spocktards "clogging up bandwidth".Hahaha, well...have fun with your useless site where the person who starts a game always goes first.
ConquerClub is in no danger of losing very many customers to Landgrab any time soon, that much is certain. But keep trying to convince yourself...maybe it will help the pain of reality.War Eagle wrote: LANDGRAB
1. games with well over 8 players
2. leaders/fortresses/capitals
3. excellent statistics that records all aspect of player skills
4. playback history (all the recorded rolls + you actually know who attacked you!)
5. clean looking maps with roving space. I am actually quite fond of the skull map, I'm playing on it right now - it's a masterpiece!![]()
CONQUERCLUB
1. Win 3.1 era buttons and interface
2. half of all games are a team full of high ranked big-wigs waiting for the other team to fill up with noobs - after all, points are all that matters here!
3. ugly, confusing, grainy, random-themed maps - that are designed like a narrow tunneled ant-hill.
4. same dull colours based on when so-and-so joined the game + streaky dice
5. interesting rating system, that reminds one of old judgemental gossiping crones, talking behind each-others backs --- or of tattling little high-school girls, messing with peoples' minds.
Well, I'm off --- to my Land of Grab... have fun listening to this guy complain aboot the dice over and over --- maybe by the time he reaches 100 posts he'll come over to where the big boys play..!