Moderator: Cartographers
That's good advice for the naming. AFAIK, Prussia was not an independent country at 1883, it was part of the German empire... Also territories had to be combined, due to the scale of the map. There's only so much you can fit into 840x800 pixels.slomo wrote:You combined many territories, which makes it hard to find the right names.
I'd recommend changing Bremen into Hannover (there was a kingdom called Hannover, it was conquered by Prussia in the 19th century)
There is a Problem with Saxony, because it combines Prussian territories and territories that weren't Prussion (like Saxony!).
I would prefer Brandenburg instead of Mecklenburg, because Brandenburg is more important (and I think Mecklenburg was independent from Prussia, so Berlin cannot be a city in Meckl.)
Benelux -> Low countries. Sounds good.Industrial Helix wrote:Looking at this again I think Benelux ought to be named the Low countries... the term Benelux is a post-WWII term.
You ever thought of giving this map an industrial revolution graphical feel? I don't think the sandy texture really conveys trains and steam power, ect.


I'd say use the side stations to receive the passenger bonus. I think that would be appropriate for this map.natty_dread wrote: orient express stations will be having an autodeploy, +1 each. Side stations will have no bonus, but can be used for the passenger bonus.
How do you mean exactly?isaiah40 wrote:I'd say use the side stations to receive the passenger bonus. I think that would be appropriate for this map.natty_dread wrote: orient express stations will be having an autodeploy, +1 each. Side stations will have no bonus, but can be used for the passenger bonus.

Well like you mentioned, hold them for passengers, and get extra passengers as a result.natty_dread wrote:How do you mean exactly?isaiah40 wrote:I'd say use the side stations to receive the passenger bonus. I think that would be appropriate for this map.natty_dread wrote: orient express stations will be having an autodeploy, +1 each. Side stations will have no bonus, but can be used for the passenger bonus.




This is a strong idea, I think. Granted, it would just be words in the instructions but portraying the struggle on the map as a struggle of monopoly and pre-1914 capitalism I think that you could have an even stronger theme and concept.natty_dread wrote:Yes, but then again... all of the territories have "passengers", in a way.
So one could think of the countries as the "passenger resources", so when you hold a whole country you have a monopoly to the passenger resources of that country, thus you get a bonus. When you hold a country and all train stations in it, you have a stronger monopoly: passengers and transportation. Thus you get a bigger bonus. It'd make sense to me.

Really? I used this as my inspiration:TaCktiX wrote:One gripe before you post out the next version: I hate both titles. They look like something I'd see on an advertisement for Oxyclean or ShamWOW. Perhaps something a little more railroad-y?





They can.I feel like France and Italy should be able to attack each other
