sad Days for america

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
thegreekdog
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Gender: Male
Location: Philadelphia

Re: sad Days for america

Post by thegreekdog »

Is Cinco de Mayo Mexican independence day? Or is it "We are illegal immigrants who have come to leech off of the government day?" Seems to me that wearing US colors on Mexican Independence Day shouldn't incite anything since Mexican independence has virtually nothing to do with the United States.

Oh, by the way - knock off the flaming guys. If you're going to talk about the issue, talk about the issue.
Image
User avatar
Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA
Contact:

Re: sad Days for america

Post by Qwert »

hmm,im not understand what its school policy in US, but if school have flag of US on building,why these kid had t-shirt of US Flag? If he have right to have these t-shirt in scholl,then everybody can have t-shirt of hes country in school, but these can cause trouble,because can you imagine school class where some wear Iran,US,Korea,Libia,Mexico,and other t-shirt with flags.
In every country scholl building have flag ,so i dont understand why he need to wear t-shirt of US? what he want to show? If you are Patriot,then you have many other ways to show that.
Like some previous write-did Girl with US Colors bikini prepare to be pictured for Playboy show that she are patriot,or she doing that for money?
In mine vilage, in distance of 100 meters,you have 4 building with Country flag, and nobody wear t-shirt with flag colours. Maybe for sport competition these hepend,but in school no.
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 78&start=0
Borderdawg
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 6:31 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Oklahoma

Re: sad Days for america

Post by Borderdawg »

thegreekdog wrote:Is Cinco de Mayo Mexican independence day? Or is it "We are illegal immigrants who have come to leech off of the government day?" Seems to me that wearing US colors on Mexican Independence Day shouldn't incite anything since Mexican independence has virtually nothing to do with the United States.

Oh, by the way - knock off the flaming guys. If you're going to talk about the issue, talk about the issue.

Nah, Sept. 16 is Mexican independence. The 5th of May was a battle between the Mexican Militia and a numerically superior French force at Puebla. All because Mexico defaulted on loan payments!!
User avatar
thegreekdog
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Gender: Male
Location: Philadelphia

Re: sad Days for america

Post by thegreekdog »

Borderdawg wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:Is Cinco de Mayo Mexican independence day? Or is it "We are illegal immigrants who have come to leech off of the government day?" Seems to me that wearing US colors on Mexican Independence Day shouldn't incite anything since Mexican independence has virtually nothing to do with the United States.

Oh, by the way - knock off the flaming guys. If you're going to talk about the issue, talk about the issue.

Nah, Sept. 16 is Mexican independence. The 5th of May was a battle between the Mexican Militia and a numerically superior French force at Puebla. All because Mexico defaulted on loan payments!!
Okay. My point still stands (and is further illustrated by the fact that I don't know what Cinco De Mayo is celebrated for). Basically, Mexicans living in the United States should not be offended by someone wearing a US flag on Cinco de Mayo.
Image
User avatar
targetman377
Posts: 2223
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 9:52 pm
Gender: Male

Re: sad Days for america

Post by targetman377 »

cinco de Mayo is NOT celabrated in MEXICO just an FYI

ok woodruff you never answered my question? about if it was the 4th of july and they showed up to school wereing mexican flags? and they got sent home. would you agree with that dicsicion too? woodruff your whole argument rest on how you intrupet free speech. if it incite someone to violence then yes we should not say it the problem with that argument is woodruff When do we stop. if i say in a joking matter Woodruff i am going to kick your Ass. and i start laughing after words. are you going to beat me up first? when you start to say that speech is the reason for violence you walk a slippery slope

constitutional kids do not have the Right to Free Speech the Seprem court has up heid lots of disticts up for actions that block kids right to speech.for example kids saying "pong hits 4 jeses" they did not see the disrict at fault for sespending the kids.

saying that do you honestly feel that the kids who wore american flags where in intemet danger from there classmates?
VOTE AUTO/TARGET in 12
User avatar
jonesthecurl
Posts: 4625
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:42 am
Gender: Male
Location: disused action figure warehouse
Contact:

Re: sad Days for america

Post by jonesthecurl »

Wow lots of opinions.
Seems a lot of fuss to me.
Here's a thought though: maybe wearing the US flag as a deliberate ploy to cause trouble (if indeed that's what the kids were doing) could itself be seen as disrespectful to the flag. Doesn't it annoy you to think that maybe these kids were using your sacred flag just to get up someone's nose?
As an analogy, I wouldn't see a bunch of people who wrapped themselves in St George's crosses at a St Patrick's day celebration to be merely announcing they were proud to be English.
And yes, if a bunch of kids turned out on 4th July being deliberately provocative in some way I would expect the same treatment.
instagram.com/garethjohnjoneswrites
User avatar
beezer
Posts: 285
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 4:41 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

Re: sad Days for america

Post by beezer »

bradleybadly wrote:Image
This shows the true nature and mentality of many of the illegal immigrants. Arizona took the correct action to protect themselves.
Image
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: sad Days for america

Post by Woodruff »

beezer wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
targetman377 wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/video/sanfrancisc ... e-19586193

this is just sad. this is pathetic the lack of patriotism in this country where you could get sent home from school because you were red white and blue.
It annoys the hell out of me personally that those high school boys are wearing U.S. flag T-shirts anyway. Pisses me off when depictions of the flag are worn as clothing...it's not respectful in any way. But that's a different issue...

However, that being as it may...the boys were frankly TRYING to instigate trouble. Say what you want, but why else would they be wearing the t-shirts and bandanas on THIS PARTICULAR DAY when, per stated reports by other students, they didn't typically wear those shirts and bandanas? In my view, attempting to incite violence at school is worthy of being sent home.

Now, if it could be shown that these boys did typically wear these shirts and bandanas (by say...wearing them maybe a couple of times per month or so), then no they shouldn't be sent home because the situation is then a significantly different one.
Ah! Quite nice of you to finally expose your true colors there, Woodruff. The kids wearing the American flag on their clothes as a symbol are instigating trouble? You've got to be out of your mind. While most teenagers are out getting into real trouble, you're worried about these guys!!!

I can only say how overjoyed I am that someone as despicable as yourself is not allowed to influence my two kids. I only wish that I knew which school district you were teaching at so I could alert the parents to kick your butt out of a taxpayer funded position. I can't believe we as taxpayers have to put up with people like yourself denigrating patriotic expression.

Oh and beware, Woodruff!! Americans sometimes say the Pledge of Allegiance, sing the National Anthem, or celebrate the 4th of July. We can't allow these people to trick us into believing they're expressing themselves via the rights guaranteed by the Constitution! After all, they're doing nothing but inciting violence and instigating trouble.

Go back to your commune.
Wow, talk about a thoroughly irrational post. Did you even read what I said? Do you have any ability to rationally put those words together in a meaningful way? Because it really appears to me that you aren't capable of it, based on your response here. Please...try to read what I've said, idiot.

You can save your flag-waving and jingoism for someone who hasn't put their life on the line for your freedoms, thanks.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
john9blue
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Gender: Male
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: sad Days for america

Post by john9blue »

jonesthecurl wrote:Wow lots of opinions.
Seems a lot of fuss to me.
Here's a thought though: maybe wearing the US flag as a deliberate ploy to cause trouble (if indeed that's what the kids were doing) could itself be seen as disrespectful to the flag. Doesn't it annoy you to think that maybe these kids were using your sacred flag just to get up someone's nose?
As an analogy, I wouldn't see a bunch of people who wrapped themselves in St George's crosses at a St Patrick's day celebration to be merely announcing they were proud to be English.
And yes, if a bunch of kids turned out on 4th July being deliberately provocative in some way I would expect the same treatment.
Give me a break, this has nothing to do with anyone's "sacred love" of the Stars and Stripes. I would be saying the same thing if this situation occurred in any other country. US just happens to be the only one that punishes its citizens for patriotism...
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: sad Days for america

Post by Woodruff »

john9blue wrote:
john9blue wrote:Well then I hope you don't find it illogical that I object to people making up ex post facto rules on the spot. In fact I think it's horribly unjust.
Maybe they did prevent a fight, who knows. Whether the decision was a "good one" isn't really the issue here. The fact that a few administrators can decide what is and isn't appropriate on the spot is very worrying. It is hardly different from a dictatorship.
You don't think that school officials should make judgement calls in the day-to-day business of their schools?
john9blue wrote:If there was a rule that said they had the power to make the judgment call... then why did the district rebuke their actions?
Do you understand what a judgement call is? That means that someone in authority over the people may disagree with it. That's why it's not...a rule.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: sad Days for america

Post by Woodruff »

jay_a2j wrote:Just saw this on FOX NEWS and the beautiful Megan Kelly was right on target. Your Constitutional rights do not end when you walk into a school. You can not pre-emptively send students home because of what you might perceive as instigation. Woody would have hated her taring apart his argument. :lol:
And as for it being disrespectful. Give me a break, you wanna-be patriot! I have a flag on the right shoulder of my uniform. Even though I am saddened that people of this great nation had to die to give you the right to spew your garbage.
Which Constitutional right is being abrogated here?
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
john9blue
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Gender: Male
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: sad Days for america

Post by john9blue »

Woodruff wrote:Do you understand what a judgement call is? That means that someone in authority over the people may disagree with it. That's why it's not...a rule.
What good is authority in the first place if employees can ignore both their superiors and the rules already in place?
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: sad Days for america

Post by Woodruff »

jay_a2j wrote: And as for it being disrespectful. Give me a break, you wanna-be patriot! I have a flag on the right shoulder of my uniform. Even though I am saddened that people of this great nation had to die to give you the right to spew your garbage.
Your ignorance is frightening.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: sad Days for america

Post by Woodruff »

targetman377 wrote:cinco de Mayo is NOT celabrated in MEXICO just an FYI

ok woodruff you never answered my question? about if it was the 4th of july and they showed up to school wereing mexican flags? and they got sent home. would you agree with that dicsicion too?
I did answer it already, but I will again.

If the school administration felt that the action could put the students into a dangerous situation, then yes I would support that as well. You see, I'm not so silly as to believe that I understand the atmosphere in that particular school...though plenty here seem to be.
targetman377 wrote:woodruff your whole argument rest on how you intrupet free speech.
No, my whole argument rests on the idea that someone in charge made a judgement call to take a certain action.
targetman377 wrote:if i say in a joking matter Woodruff i am going to kick your Ass. and i start laughing after words. are you going to beat me up first? when you start to say that speech is the reason for violence you walk a slippery slope
That's quite true, and yet "free speech" does come with inherent consequences...it doesn't mean that it's a free-for-all of saying anything that you want to without repercussion.
targetman377 wrote:saying that do you honestly feel that the kids who wore american flags where in intemet danger from there classmates?
I don't know...I'm not at that school. That's why I support the administration's position in this case. Their job is to make that call.
Last edited by Woodruff on Fri May 07, 2010 12:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: sad Days for america

Post by Woodruff »

john9blue wrote:
jonesthecurl wrote:Wow lots of opinions.
Seems a lot of fuss to me.
Here's a thought though: maybe wearing the US flag as a deliberate ploy to cause trouble (if indeed that's what the kids were doing) could itself be seen as disrespectful to the flag. Doesn't it annoy you to think that maybe these kids were using your sacred flag just to get up someone's nose?
As an analogy, I wouldn't see a bunch of people who wrapped themselves in St George's crosses at a St Patrick's day celebration to be merely announcing they were proud to be English.
And yes, if a bunch of kids turned out on 4th July being deliberately provocative in some way I would expect the same treatment.
Give me a break, this has nothing to do with anyone's "sacred love" of the Stars and Stripes. I would be saying the same thing if this situation occurred in any other country. US just happens to be the only one that punishes its citizens for patriotism...
Is it really patriotism to wear a United States flag t-shirt ONLY on Cinco de Mayo? Do you really see that as patriotic? I certainly don't.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: sad Days for america

Post by Woodruff »

john9blue wrote:
Woodruff wrote:Do you understand what a judgement call is? That means that someone in authority over the people may disagree with it. That's why it's not...a rule.
What good is authority in the first place if employees can ignore both their superiors and the rules already in place?
So you're saying that you DON'T understand what a judgement call is, then? Even in the military, we supervisors had a wide ranging ability to make judgement calls about all sorts of things.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
72o
Posts: 1014
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:04 am
Gender: Male

Re: sad Days for america

Post by 72o »

I agree with greekdog. It shouldn't matter what day it is, the kids should be able to wear whatever flag they want on whatever day. As long as it's not pornography or revealing, and it's not otherwise against the dress code, I don't see how the school saw it as a problem.

Sure, the kids did it on purpose. That's what kids do. They're gonna do whatever they can to get attention and cause a ruckus. Big fuckin deal. The school should have ignored it.

I don't see why it would offend Messicans to see the American flag on their holiday. If I went to Cabo on the 4th of July I wouldn't be offended to see a bunch of Messicans wearing their flag.

For that matter, what about Iranian kids, or Pakistani, Afghani, etc. etc. If they wear their flag, or traditional clothing from their parents' countries on the 4th of July, will the school send them home?

And woodruff, I could care less which side of this issue you're on, that's less and less the point of this thread. It has now become all about you personally attacking everybody's intelligence because you feel you are so much better than them. If you were actually intelligent, you'd realize that insulting someone else's intelligence is beneath you and unnecessary. More likely is that you're just a troll.
Image
User avatar
beezer
Posts: 285
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 4:41 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

Re: sad Days for america

Post by beezer »

Woodruff wrote:Wow, talk about a thoroughly irrational post.
Wow, talk about an utterly predictable response! Woodruff uses the word irrational once again to describe any dissent with his posts.
Woodruff wrote:Did you even read what I said?
Yeah, made we want to puke
Woodruff wrote:Do you have any ability to rationally put those words together in a meaningful way?
Apparently well enough to instigate a response from you. Maybe you'll be incited to violence!! :o
Woodruff wrote:Because it really appears to me that you aren't capable of it, based on your response here. Please...try to read what I've said, idiot.
Hehe, the taxpayers who live in your school district are sadly underserved. Let's hear another "you lack reading comprehension" line, Woody. Oh yeah, and complaining about BK Barunt bullying you was pathetic. We all get challenged by BK from time to time.
Woodruff wrote:You can save your flag-waving and jingoism for someone who hasn't put their life on the line for your freedoms, thanks.
Since I know it irks you so much...........

Image

And you can save us all your "I'm a veteran" routine. When it comes to this issue, I give you about as much credit for being a veteran as Marty Weithaupt or Benedict Arnold.
Image
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: sad Days for america

Post by Woodruff »

72o wrote: And woodruff, I could care less which side of this issue you're on, that's less and less the point of this thread. It has now become all about you personally attacking everybody's intelligence because you feel you are so much better than them. If you were actually intelligent, you'd realize that insulting someone else's intelligence is beneath you and unnecessary. More likely is that you're just a troll.
What you need to do is read the thread a bit more closely. For those who have responded with rational arguments, I've said nothing at all about their intelligence.

However, when individuals feel the need to flame me with flag-waving, jingoistic rhetoric, all I'm doing is stating the obvious. Many of the flames I've recieved have been simply because of very basic statements I've made that had no intelligence-smattering to them at all.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: sad Days for america

Post by Woodruff »

beezer wrote:
Woodruff wrote:Wow, talk about a thoroughly irrational post.
Wow, talk about an utterly predictable response! Woodruff uses the word irrational once again to describe any dissent with his posts.
Your post wasn't about dissent...it was about fragging me.
beezer wrote:
Woodruff wrote:Did you even read what I said?
Yeah, made we want to puke
Because you only think that freedom of speech should pertain to those who agree with you.
beezer wrote:
Woodruff wrote:Because it really appears to me that you aren't capable of it, based on your response here. Please...try to read what I've said, idiot.
Hehe, the taxpayers who live in your school district are sadly underserved.
So you also believe that you can base my job performance on a few posts in an internet forum? That's absolutely the sort of thing that SHOULD cause someone to question your intelligence.
beezer wrote:
Woodruff wrote:You can save your flag-waving and jingoism for someone who hasn't put their life on the line for your freedoms, thanks.
Since I know it irks you so much...........
Yes, fake patriotism bothers me a great deal. I much prefer the real thing. Do you have any of that?
beezer wrote:And you can save us all your "I'm a veteran" routine. When it comes to this issue, I give you about as much credit for being a veteran as Marty Weithaupt or Benedict Arnold.
Because I don't agree with you...well, that's certainly a great point for not questioning your intelligence, right?
Last edited by Woodruff on Fri May 07, 2010 5:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Army of GOD
Posts: 7192
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm
Gender: Male

Re: sad Days for america

Post by Army of GOD »

Woodruff wrote:
targetman377 wrote:And you can save us all your "I'm a veteran" routine. When it comes to this issue, I give you about as much credit for being a veteran as Marty Weithaupt or Benedict Arnold.
Because I don't agree with you...well, that's certainly a great point for not questioning your intelligence, right?
Did you manually change the author of that quote to targetman?
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
BigBallinStalin
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham
Contact:

Re: sad Days for america

Post by BigBallinStalin »

thegreekdog wrote:
Baron Von PWN wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:Image


Excuse me sir, but could you please turn your t-shirt inside out?

LAWSUIT!!!
I love those shirts the irony is delicious.
I have a t-shirt with that face and the caption "This Shirt Brought to You by Capitalism." It used to be my avatar.
So this is me at a party. I really wasn't in the mood, but I showed up anyway.

Image
User avatar
beezer
Posts: 285
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 4:41 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

Re: sad Days for america

Post by beezer »

The Bullied Vulcan wrote:Your post wasn't about dissent...it was about fragging me.
Perhaps I should apologize for bullying you. And now you try to play the role of martyr. :roll: It was you who fragged those kids in your opening post.

Somehow, you have the omniscient attribute of being able to determine the motivations behind these kids in wearing their clothes. It couldn't be that they simply wanted to wear them to express any patriotic feelings. It has to be their motivation to incite violence.
The Bullied Vulcan wrote:Because you only think that freedom of speech should pertain to those who agree with you.
Nah, it happens plenty here. The difference is when a self-righteous person like yourself equates disagreement as lack of intelligence. Then this tactic is repeated over and over again as if its self perpetuation makes the user (yourself) correct by merely claiming it.
The Bullied Vulcan wrote:So you also believe that you can base my job performance on a few posts in an internet forum?
Pretty much, but it wouldn't just be a few. It would be more like your entire attitude whenever challenged.
The Bullied Vulcan wrote:Yes, fake patriotism bothers me a great deal. I much prefer the real thing. Do you have any of that?
No, I just participate for the BBQs and fireworks. Occasionally, I like to incite violence by listening to God Bless America or The Stars And Stripes Forever.
The Bullied Vulcan wrote:Because I don't agree with you...well, that's certainly a great point for not questioning your intelligence, right?
Because you try to shield yourself by invoking your veteran status. You probably thought that would give you cover.
Image
User avatar
jay_a2j
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Re: sad Days for america

Post by jay_a2j »

Woodruff wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:Just saw this on FOX NEWS and the beautiful Megan Kelly was right on target. Your Constitutional rights do not end when you walk into a school. You can not pre-emptively send students home because of what you might perceive as instigation. Woody would have hated her taring apart his argument. :lol:
And as for it being disrespectful. Give me a break, you wanna-be patriot! I have a flag on the right shoulder of my uniform. Even though I am saddened that people of this great nation had to die to give you the right to spew your garbage.
Which Constitutional right is being abrogated here?

Freedom of expression. Any further questions should be directed to Megan Kelly.... the lawyer.... the beauty queen.
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
jay_a2j
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Re: sad Days for america

Post by jay_a2j »

beezer wrote:
bradleybadly wrote:Image

Wonder who had the guts to steal that sign out of PLAYERS garage? :-k
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
JESUS SAVES!!!
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”